针对胚胎遗传学检测的全新国产测序平台的临床应用
Clinical Application for Embryo Genetic Testing Based on a New Domestic Sequencing Platform
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1541080, PDF,   
作者: 尹奕琪*, 周 平#:安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科,安徽 合肥
关键词: PGT阻滞胚胎染色体异常Preimplantation Genetic Testing Arrested Embryo Chromosomal Abnormalities
摘要: 目的:评估全新国产测序平台——GenoLab M DX基因测序仪在临床检测中的应用价值。方法:收集2021~2023年于我中心行辅助生殖技术助孕的患者的3位亚显微染色体拷贝数异常患者的4个染色体异常胚胎和数个IVF周期的132枚早期发育阻滞的胚胎、20个外周血样本及1个流产样本投入国产测序平台GenoLab M DX进行染色体测序,验证此平台对于CNV的有效测定。结果:4个废弃胚胎均基本上检测到预期的2~3 M的小CNV;早期发育阻滞的胚胎中成功检测127枚,染色体异常率为74.8% (95/127),32枚胚胎染色体正常;部分外周血样本中也检测出了染色体核型异常存在。结论:GenoLab M DX基因测序仪对样本进行染色体非整倍体检测,展现出超高的准确性和时效性,实现低成本前提下的高临床应用价值。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the application value of the novel domestic sequencing platform, the GenoLab M DX gene sequencer, in clinical testing. Methods: From 2021 to 2023, a total of 4 chromosomally abnormal embryos (with submicroscopic copy number variations [CNVs]) from 3 patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) at our center, 132 early development-arrested embryos from several IVF cycles, 20 peripheral blood samples, and 1 miscarriage sample were subjected to chromosomal sequencing using the domestic GenoLab M DX sequencing platform. The platform’s effectiveness in detecting CNVs was validated. Results: All four discarded embryos were essentially detected with the expected small CNVs (2~3 Mb). Among the 132 early development-arrested embryos, 127 were successfully sequenced, with a chromosomal abnormality rate of 74.8% (95/127). Thirty-two embryos were found to be chromosomally normal. Chromosomal karyotype abnormalities were also detected in some peripheral blood samples. Conclusion: The GenoLab M DX gene sequencer demonstrated ultra-high accuracy and timeliness in detecting chromosomal aneuploidy in samples, achieving high clinical application value at a low cost.
文章引用:尹奕琪, 周平. 针对胚胎遗传学检测的全新国产测序平台的临床应用[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(4): 1466-1472. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1541080

参考文献

[1] Viotti, M. (2020) Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements. Genes, 11, Article 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] De Rycke, M. and Berckmoes, V. (2020) Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders. Genes, 11, Article 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Ozturk, S. (2023) Genetic Variants Underlying Developmental Arrests in Human Preimplantation Embryos. Molecular Human Reproduction, 29, gaad024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Sfakianoudis, K., Maziotis, E., Karantzali, E., Kokkini, G., Grigoriadis, S., Pantou, A., et al. (2021) Molecular Drivers of Developmental Arrest in the Human Preimplantation Embryo: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis Leading to Mapping Future Research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22, Article 8353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Sahin, G.N., Yildirim, R.M. and Seli, E. (2023) Embryonic Arrest: Causes and Implications. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 35, 184-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Gajecka, M. (2015) Unrevealed Mosaicism in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 291, 513-530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Taylor, T.H., Gitlin, S.A., Patrick, J.L., Crain, J.L., Wilson, J.M. and Griffin, D.K. (2014) The Origin, Mechanisms, Incidence and Clinical Consequences of Chromosomal Mosaicism in Humans. Human Reproduction Update, 20, 571-581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Maxwell, S.M., Colls, P., Hodes-Wertz, B., McCulloh, D.H., McCaffrey, C., Wells, D., et al. (2016) Why Do Euploid Embryos Miscarry? A Case-Control Study Comparing the Rate of Aneuploidy within Presumed Euploid Embryos That Resulted in Miscarriage or Live Birth Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Fertility and Sterility, 106, 1414-1419.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Girirajan, S., Rosenfeld, J.A., Coe, B.P., Parikh, S., Friedman, N., Goldstein, A., et al. (2012) Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Genomic Disorders and Rare Copy-Number Variants. New England Journal of Medicine, 367, 1321-1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Iturriaga, A., Mounts, E., Picchetta, L., Vega, C., Mulas, F., Ottolini, C.S., et al. (2024) Confirmation and Pathogenicity of Small Copy Number Variations Incidentally Detected via a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Platform. Fertility and Sterility, 122, 789-798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Rotshenker-Olshinka, K., Srebnik Moshe, N., Weiss, O., Shaviv, S., Freireich, O., Segel, R., et al. (2021) Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) for Copy Number Variants of Uncertain Significance (CNV-VUS) in the Genomic Era: To Do or Not to Do? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 38, 719-725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Caroselli, S., Figliuzzi, M., Picchetta, L., Cogo, F., Zambon, P., Pergher, I., et al. (2023) Improved Clinical Utility of Preimplantation Genetic Testing through the Integration of Ploidy and Common Pathogenic Microdeletions Analyses. Human Reproduction, 38, 762-775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]