家庭累积风险与中学生学习投入的关系:自我效能感的中介作用
Relationship between Cumulative Family Risk and Student Engagement among Middle School Students: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.154211, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 胡 晓*:南宁师范大学师园学院教育系,广西 南宁;农柳珍:靖西市外国语学校初中部,广西 靖西
关键词: 累积风险家庭青少年自我效能感学习投入Cumulative Risk Family Adolescent Self-Efficacy Student Engagement
摘要: 聚焦自我效能感在家庭累积风险与中学生学习投入关系中的作用机制,采用家庭累积风险问卷、一般自我效能感量表和学习投入问卷对554名中学生进行调查。结果发现:(1) 家庭累积风险与自我效能感、学习投入均显著负相关,自我效能感与学习投入呈显著正相关;(2) 家庭累积风险显著负向预测中学生学习投入;(3) 自我效能感在家庭累积风险与学习投入的关系中起部分中介作用。研究结果启示教育工作者关注青少年家庭风险,帮助其培养积极的心理品质,提升青少年自我效能感水平以提高其学习投入。
Abstract: Focusing on the role of self-efficacy in the relationship of cumulative family risk and student engagement of middle school students, 554 middle school students were investigated using the Cumulative Family Risk Questionnaire, the General Self-Efficacy Scale and the Student Engagement Questionnaire. The results showed that: (1) There was a significant negative correlation between cumulative family risk and self-efficacy and student engagement, and a significant positive correlation between self-efficacy and student engagement; (2) The cumulative family risk significantly negatively predicted the student engagement of middle school students; (3) Self-efficacy played a mediating role in the relationship between cumulative family risk and student engagement. The results of the current study suggest that educators should pay more attention to the cumulative family risk factors of adolescents, help them cultivate positive psychological qualities, improve their self-efficacy and improve their student engagement.
文章引用:胡晓, 农柳珍 (2025). 家庭累积风险与中学生学习投入的关系:自我效能感的中介作用. 心理学进展, 15(4), 306-314. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.154211

参考文献

[1] 陈建文, 刘艳, 谭千保(2022). 累积生态风险与高职生学习倦怠: 消极自我图式和网络成瘾的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 38(4), 576-583.
[2] 楚啸原, 理原, 王兴超, 王鹏程, 雷雳(2019). 家庭社会经济地位与青少年自我效能感的关系: 家庭支持的中介作用与性别因素的调节作用. 心理科学, 42(4), 891-897.
[3] 方来坛, 时勘, 张风华(2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620.
[4] 费立鹏, 沈其杰, 郑延平, 赵靖平, 蒋少艾, 王立伟, 汪向东(1991). “家庭亲密度和适应性量表”和“家庭环境量表”的初步评价——正常家庭与精神分裂症家庭成员对照研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 5(5), 198-202.
[5] 贾晓珊, 朱海东, 孙桂芹(2022). 主观社会地位与青少年消极冒险行为的关系: 自我控制的中介作用和性别的调节作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 30(2), 232-237.
[6] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园(2022). 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 38(3), 348-357.
[7] 李董平, 周月月, 赵力燕, 王艳辉, 孙文强(2016). 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾: 心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用. 心理学报, 48(12), 1519-1537.
[8] 石雷山, 陈英敏, 侯秀, 高峰强(2013). 家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系: 学业自我效能的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 71-78.
[9] 谭千保, 易艺宇, 黄勇(2022). 累积生态风险对农村初中生学业适应的影响及其规避. 教育发展研究, 42(6), 47-55.
[10] 王才康, 胡中锋, 刘勇(2001). 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学, 7(1), 37-40.
[11] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[12] 熊俊梅, 海曼, 黄飞, 辛亮, 徐颖(2020). 家庭累积风险与青少年心理健康的关系——心理资本的补偿效应和调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 36(1), 94-102.
[13] 岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦(2022). 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入: 状态焦虑与性别的作用. 心理与行为研究, 20(2), 226-232.
[14] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[15] Aber, L., Morris, P., & Raver, C. (2012). Children, Families and Poverty: Definitions, Trends, Emerging Science and Implications for Policy and Commentaries. Social Policy Report, 26, 1-29.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.[CrossRef
[17] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
[18] Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development (pp. 793-828). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
[19] Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An Interactionist Perspective on the Socioeconomic Context of Human Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175-199.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Currie, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of Socioeconomic Status for Adolescents: The WHO Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Survey. Health Education Research, 12, 385-397.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Cutrona, C. E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Russell, D. W. (1994). Perceived Parental Social Support and Academic Achievement: An Attachment Theory Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 369-378.[CrossRef
[22] Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From Expectancy-Value Theory to Situated Expectancy-Value Theory: A Developmental, Social Cognitive, and Sociocultural Perspective on Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101859.[CrossRef
[23] Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk. Human Nature, 20, 204-268.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Evans, G. W., Li, D., & Whipple, S. S. (2013). Cumulative Risk and Child Development. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1342-1396.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Wang, M., & Brauer, S. (2019). Profiles of School Disengagement. In Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions (pp. 31-43). Elsevier.[CrossRef
[26] Henry, K. L., Knight, K. E., & Thornberry, T. P. (2012). School Disengagement as a Predictor of Dropout, Delinquency, and Problem Substance Use during Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 156-166.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Kurtz, L., & Derevensky, J. L. (1993). The Effects of Divorce on Perceived Self-Efficacy and Behavioral Control in Elementary School Children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 20, 75-94.[CrossRef
[28] Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S., & Valois, R. F. (2011). Life Satisfaction and Student Engagement in Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 249-262.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of School Engagement during Adolescence: Implications for Grades, Depression, Delinquency, and Substance Use. Developmental Psychology, 47, 233-247.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Long, N., Forehand, R., Fauber, R., & Brody, G. H. (1987). Self-Perceived and Independently Observed Competence of Young Adolescents as a Function of Parental Marital Conflict and Recent Divorce. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 15-27.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Moos, R. H. (1994). Family Environment Scale Manual: Development, Applications, Research. Consulting Psychologists Press.
[32] Moroni, S., Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., & Baeriswyl, F. (2015). The Need to Distinguish between Quantity and Quality in Research on Parental Involvement: The Example of Parental Help with Homework. The Journal of Educational Research, 108, 417-431.[CrossRef
[33] Morton, M. H., & Montgomery, P. (2013). Youth Empowerment Programs for Improving Adolescents’ Self-Efficacy and Self-esteem. Research on Social Work Practice, 23, 22-33.[CrossRef
[34] Morton, M., & Montgomery, P. (2011). Youth Empowerment Programs for Improving Self‐Efficacy and Self‐Esteem of Adolescents. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7, 1-80.[CrossRef
[35] Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and Engagement in University Students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464-481.[CrossRef
[36] Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and Social Cognitive Theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832.[CrossRef
[37] Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2022). Self-Efficacy and Engaged Learners. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 155-170). Springer International Publishing.[CrossRef
[38] Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The Assessment of Optimistic Self‐Beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese Versions of the General Self‐Efficacy Scale. Applied Psychology, 46, 69-88.[CrossRef
[39] Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer.[CrossRef
[40] Thorne, B. (1993). Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. Rutgers University Press.
[41] Thorne, B., & Luria, Z. (2001). Sexuality and Gender in Children’s Daily Worlds. In Down to Earth Sociology: Introductory Readings (pp. 156-167). Free Press.
[42] Usher, E. L., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Social Cognitive Theoretical Perspective of Self-regulation. In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 19-35). Routledge.[CrossRef
[43] Weiser, D. A., & Riggio, H. R. (2010). Family Background and Academic Achievement: Does Self-Efficacy Mediate Outcomes? Social Psychology of Education, 13, 367-383.[CrossRef
[44] Wong, Z. Y., Liem, G. A. D., Chan, M., & Datu, J. A. D. (2024). Student Engagement and Its Association with Academic Achievement and Subjective Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116, 48-75.[CrossRef
[45] Wright, M. O., Masten, A. S., & Narayan, A. J. (2013). Resilience Processes in Development: Four Waves of Research on Positive Adaptation in the Context of Adversity. In Handbook of Resilience in Children (pp. 15-37). Springer.[CrossRef