汽车PEPS系统的蓝牙定位识别算法设计
Design of Bluetooth Positioning and Identification Algorithm for Automotive PEPS System
摘要: 本文提出了一种基于差分加权K近邻算法的蓝牙PEPS车内外高精度识别系统。通过Dempster-Shafer (DS)融合方法,将双终端算法与传统单终端算法的结果融合,显著提高了车内外识别的准确率。研究构建了蓝牙信标RSSI指纹数据库,并设计了信念Hellinger距离作为新的证据融合方法。实验使用了NRF52832蓝牙开发板,并结合加权K近邻、朴素贝叶斯和分类回归树等方法对RSSI信号进行识别。经过验证测试,DS融合算法的识别准确率超过97%,溢出距离测试准确率接近100%。研究结果表明,改进的DS证据理论能够有效提升多源数据信息融合的性能,为车内外识别系统提供了可靠的解决方案。
Abstract: This paper presents a high-precision identification system for in-vehicle and out-of-vehicle scenarios based on a differential weighted K-nearest neighbors algorithm for Bluetooth PEPS (Passive Entry Passive Start). By employing the Dempster-Shafer (DS) fusion method, the results of the dual-terminal algorithm are integrated with those of the traditional single-terminal algorithm, significantly improving the accuracy of in-vehicle and out-of-vehicle recognition. The study constructs a Bluetooth beacon RSSI fingerprint database and designs the Hellinger distance as a new evidence fusion method. Experiments were conducted using the NRF52832 Bluetooth development board, combined with weighted K-nearest neighbors, Naive Bayes, and classification and regression trees to recognize RSSI signals. Validation tests showed that the recognition accuracy of the DS fusion algorithm exceeded 97%, with an overflow distance test accuracy approaching 100%. The results indicate that the improved DS evidence theory can effectively enhance the performance of multi-source data information fusion, providing a reliable solution for the in-vehicle and out-of-vehicle identification system.
文章引用:周磊祥. 汽车PEPS系统的蓝牙定位识别算法设计[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(4): 359-368. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.144293

参考文献

[1] Chang, R., Lin, T. and Lin, J. (2024) A Vehicle Passive Entry Passive Start System with the Intelligent Internet of Things. Electronics, 13, Article 2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Milano, F., da Rocha, H., Laracca, M., Ferrigno, L., Espírito Santo, A., Salvado, J., et al. (2024) Ble-based Indoor Localization: Analysis of Some Solutions for Performance Improvement. Sensors, 24, Article 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Chen, B., Ma, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., Fan, J. and Lan, H. (2024) Research Progress of Wireless Positioning Methods Based on RSSI. Electronics, 13, Article 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Sadowski, S., Spachos, P. and Plataniotis, K.N. (2020) Memoryless Techniques and Wireless Technologies for Indoor Localization with the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7, 10996-11005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Cortesi, S., Vogt, C. and Magno, M. (2023) Comparison between an RSSI-and an MCPD-Based BLE Indoor Localization System. Computers, 12, Article 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Li, X., Dai, Z. and He, L. (2022) A K-Nearest Neighbor Indoor Fingerprint Location Method Based on Coarse Positioning Circular Domain and the Highest Similarity Threshold. Measurement Science and Technology, 34, Article 015108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Su, H., Ren, J. and Wen, Z. (2018) An Approach Using Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory to Fuse Multi-Source Observations for Dam Safety Estimation. Soft Computing, 23, 5633-5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Ding, Y., Yao, X., Wang, S. and Zhao, X. (2019) Structural Damage Assessment Using Improved Dempster-Shafer Data Fusion Algorithm. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18, 395-408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Deng, Y. (2016) Deng Entropy. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 91, 549-553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef