重复经颅磁刺激联合齐拉西酮对精神分裂症患者康复效果的影响
Effect of Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Ziprasidone on Rehabilitation of Patients with Schizophrenia
摘要: 目的:选取枣庄市精神卫生中心120例精神分裂症患者,随机数字表法分两组,各60例。对照组口服盐酸齐拉西酮胶囊,研究组在此基础上联合重复经颅磁刺激,对比精神症状[简明精神病量表(BPRS)]、心率变异性[24 h内全部相邻正常心动周期差值均方根(RMSSD)、24 h内每5 min节段平均窦性R-R间期标准差(SDANN)、24 h内全部窦性心搏R-R间期的标准差(SDNN)、24 h内相邻R-R间期差值大于50 ms心搏占正常心搏总数百分比(PNN50)]、攻击行为[外显攻击行为量表(MOAS)]、睡眠质量[匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)]。结果:干预前,两组各项评分与指标对比(P > 0.05);干预后,研究组BPRS评分中,焦虑抑郁为16.98 ± 3.75分,缺乏活力为12.47 ± 2.34分,思维障碍为14.38 ± 2.52分,激活性为8.29 ± 2.78分,敌对猜疑为7.96 ± 1.63分,对照组BPRS评分中,焦虑抑郁为19.82 ± 3.32分,缺乏活力为18.83 ± 2.67分,思维障碍为18.62 ± 2.29分,激活性为11.37 ± 2.35分,敌对猜疑为11.25 ± 1.92分,研究组症状严重程度低于对照组(t: 4.392, 13.876, 9.645, 6.554, 10.118, P < 0.05),干预后,研究组心率变异性中,RMSSD为45.28 ± 3.76 ms,SDANN为112.38 ± 6.23 ms,SDNN为105.25 ± 2.52 ms,PNN50为15.49% ± 3.84%,对照组心率变异性中,RMSSD为35.62 ± 3.63 ms,SDANN为92.76 ± 5.68 ms,SDNN为98.37 ± 3.72 ms,PNN50为11.83% ± 4.85%,干预后,对照组心率变异性各项指标显著降低,研究组未见明显变化,且研究组心率变异性优于对照组(P < 0.05),研究组攻击行为低于对照组(P < 0.05),研究组PSQI评分中,睡眠效率为1.46 ± 0.34分,睡眠质量为1.37 ± 0.26分,入睡时间为1.52 ± 0.25分,催眠药物为1.12 ± 0.31分,睡眠时间为1.31 ± 0.27分,睡眠障碍为1.19 ± 0.43分,日间功能障碍为1.46 ± 0.63分,对照组PSQI评分中,睡眠效率为1.83 ± 0.27分,睡眠质量为1.79 ± 0.18分,入睡时间为1.96 ± 0.37分,催眠药物为1.75 ± 0.42分,睡眠时间为1.86 ± 0.34分,睡眠障碍为1.82 ± 0.16分,日间功能障碍为1.93 ± 0.37分,研究组PSQI评分较低(P < 0.05)。结论:重复经颅磁刺激联合齐拉西酮对精神分裂症患者能够改善精神症状,对患者心率影响较小,降低患者攻击行为,提高睡眠质量。
Abstract: Objective: To select 120 patients with schizophrenia from Zaozhuang Mental Health Center and divide them into two groups with 60 cases each by random number table method. The control group took ziprasidone hydrochloride capsule orally, and the study group combined repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on this basis. Psychiatric symptoms [Brief Psychiatric Scale (BPRS)], heart rate variability [root mean square difference of all adjacent normal cardiac cycles within 24 hours (RMSSD), mean sinus R-R interval standard deviation per 5 min segment within 24 hours (SDANN), standard deviation of all sinus beats R-R interval within 24 hours (SDNN), and adjacent R- within 24 hours R-interval difference greater than 50 ms percentage of total normal heart beats (PNN50), aggressive behavior [Explicit Aggressive Behavior Scale (MOAS)], and sleep quality [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)]. Results: Before intervention, the scores and indexes of the two groups were compared (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the BPRS score of the study group was 16.98 ± 3.75 points for anxiety and depression, 12.47 ± 2.34 points for lack of vitality, 14.38 ± 2.52 points for thinking disorder, 8.29 ± 2.78 points for activation, 7.96 ± 1.63 points for hostile suspicion. Anxiety and depression were 19.82 ± 3.32 scores, inactivity 18.83 ± 2.67 scores, thinking disorder 18.62 ± 2.29 scores, activation 11.37 ± 2.35 scores, hostile suspicion 11.25 ± 1.92 scores, the severity of symptoms in the study group was lower than that in the control group (t: 4.392, 13.876, 9.645, 6.554, 10.118, P < 0.05). After intervention, the RMSSD, SDANN and SDNN were 45.28 ± 3.76 ms, 112.38 ± 6.23 ms and 105.25 ± 2.52 ms respectively. PNN50 was 15.49% ± 3.84%, RMSSD was 35.62 ± 3.63 ms, SDANN was 92.76 ± 5.68 ms, SDNN was 98.37 ± 3.72 ms, and PNN50 was 11.83% ± 4.85% in the control group. All indexes of heart rate variability in the control group were significantly decreased, while no significant changes were observed in the study group. The heart rate variability in the study group was better than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the aggressive behavior in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The PSQI score of the study group was 1.46 ± 0.34 points, and the sleep quality was 1.37 ± 0.26 points. Sleep time was 1.52 ± 0.25 points, hypnotic drugs 1.12 ± 0.31 points, sleep time 1.31 ± 0.27 points, sleep disorders 1.19 ± 0.43 points, daytime dysfunction 1.46 ± 0.63 points. In the PSQI score of the control group, sleep efficiency was 1.83 ± 0.27 points. Sleep quality was 1.79 ± 0.18 points, sleep time was 1.96 ± 0.37 points, hypnotic drugs were 1.75 ± 0.42 points, sleep time was 1.86 ± 0.34 points, sleep disorders were 1.82 ± 0.16 points, daytime dysfunction was 1.93 ± 0.37 points, PSQI score was lower in the study group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with ziprasidone can improve mental symptoms, have little effect on heart rate, reduce aggressive behavior and improve sleep quality in patients with schizophrenia.
文章引用:师洋洋, 孔伶俐. 重复经颅磁刺激联合齐拉西酮对精神分裂症患者康复效果的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(4): 1728-1734. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1541114

参考文献

[1] 史翠路, 孙继北, 张春友. 托吡酯联合喹硫平治疗精神分裂症的疗效及对患者血清FBG、HbA1c、LDL-C、HDL-C水平及脑电波的影响[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2024, 16(9): 1639-1642, 1647.
[2] 刘旭东. 经颅磁刺激联合药物干预在难治性精神分裂症患者中的治疗效果及对事件相关电位和认知功能的影响研究[J]. 系统医学, 2024, 9(15): 25-28, 51.
[3] 李丹丹, 乔云云, 罗红霞. 鲁拉西酮联合低剂量奥氮平治疗女性精神分裂症的疗效及对患者催乳素水平的影响[J]. 海南医学, 2024, 35(22): 3241-3244.
[4] 王春莲, 张平, 辛宝泉, 等. 棕榈酸帕利哌酮注射液和奥氮平对精神分裂症患者的疗效、安全性以及社会功能的影响[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 70-73.
[5] 严微红, 吴东, 熊静. 帕利哌酮、哌罗匹隆治疗对男性精神分裂症患者的临床疗效及对血清泌乳素水平的影响[J]. 药品评价, 2024, 21(5): 578-581.
[6] 杜全军, 杜茜茜, 王宁. 脑电刺激联合奥氮平对精神分裂症患者的临床疗效、精神状态、神经功能、认知功能的影响[J]. 四川生理科学杂志, 2024, 46(6): 1215-1217, 1225.
[7] 黄晓东, 王元杰, 董晓琳. 阿立哌唑联合帕利哌酮治疗青年女性难治性精神分裂症的疗效及对认知功能影响[J]. 现代养生, 2023, 23(12): 891-894.
[8] 黄小慧, 潘小平, 班一峰. 阿立哌唑与喹硫平治疗老年精神分裂症患者的临床疗效及安全性比较研究[J]. 世界复合医学, 2023, 9(1): 190-193, 198.
[9] 张生, 周刚柱, 李新峰, 等. 喹硫平联合舍曲林治疗精神分裂症抑郁症状患者的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 四川生理科学杂志, 2023, 45(11): 2202-2204.
[10] 杨松, 张丽丽, 张云淑, 等. MTHFR基因多态性与非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症患者疗效的关系研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2023, 39(5): 625-629.
[11] 钟伦淳, 赖忠红, 吴杰, 等. 低频重复经颅磁刺激联合电针治疗精神分裂症幻听患者的疗效及对其社会功能的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2023, 30(24): 70-72, 76.
[12] 汤锦磊, 吴联, 徐凡凡, 等. 针刺八脉交会穴联合喹硫平治疗精神分裂症疗效观察及对氧化应激因子、血脂代谢的影响[J]. 新中医, 2024, 56(5): 158-163.