面向价值共创的数字服务平台与互补企业两阶段动态激励机制研究
Research on Two-Stage Dynamic Incentive Mechanism of Digital Service Platform and Complementary Enterprises Oriented to Value Co-Creation
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1441008, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 孙嘉薇, 彭永涛:江苏大学管理学院,江苏 镇江;景徐荣:山秀科技有限公司,江苏 无锡
关键词: 数字服务平台价值共创动态激励委托代理Digital Service Platform Value Co-Creation Dynamic Excitation Agency by Agreement
摘要: 针对信息不对称情形下数字服务平台与互补企业价值共创的动态激励问题,构建两阶段的动态激励模型,综合运用委托代理理论和贝叶斯统计法对模型的最优均衡解进行求解和分析,并通过数值仿真来验证模型的最优解。研究结果表明:经过第一阶段的合作,双方的信任程度增加,数字服务平台第二阶段的产出始终高于第一阶段,且两个阶段产出的差距不断缩小;数字服务平台越关注整体的利益,向互补企业提供的契约激励系数越大,激励效果越明显,互补企业会主动增加对创新型努力的投入,减少投机行为;数字服务平台只有在关注整体利益时加大监管力度,才能有效激励互补企业投入更多生产性努力,减少投机行为,实现共赢。研究结论可为数字服务平台设计动态激励机制提供参考。
Abstract: Aiming at the dynamic incentive problem of value co-creation between digital service platform and complementary enterprises under asymmetric information, a two-stage dynamic incentive model is constructed, and the optimal equilibrium solution of the model is solved and analyzed by using the principal-agent theory and Bayesian statistics method, and the optimal solution of the model is verified by numerical simulation. The results show that after the first stage of cooperation, the trust between the two parties has increased, and the output of the second stage of digital service platform has always been higher than that of the first stage, and the gap between the outputs of the two stages has been narrowing; the more the digital service platform pays attention to the overall interests, the greater the contract incentive coefficient provided to complementary enterprises, and the more obvious the incentive effect. Complementary enterprises will actively increase their investment in innovative efforts and reduce speculation. Only by strengthening supervision when paying attention to the overall interests can the digital service platform effectively encourage complementary enterprises to invest more productive efforts, reduce speculation and achieve a win-win situation. The research conclusion can provide reference for the design of dynamic incentive mechanism of digital service platform.
文章引用:孙嘉薇, 彭永涛, 景徐荣. 面向价值共创的数字服务平台与互补企业两阶段动态激励机制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(4): 1261-1274. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1441008

参考文献

[1] Kolagar, M., Parida, V. and Sjödin, D. (2022) Ecosystem Transformation for Digital Servitization: A Systematic Review, Integrative Framework, and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Business Research, 146, 176-200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Chirumalla, K., Leoni, L. and Oghazi, P. (2023) Moving from Servitization to Digital Servitization: Identifying the Required Dynamic Capabilities and Related Microfoundations to Facilitate the Transition. Journal of Business Research, 158, Article ID: 113668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Ardolino, M., Rapaccini, M., Saccani, N., Gaiardelli, P., Crespi, G. and Ruggeri, C. (2017) The Role of Digital Technologies for the Service Transformation of Industrial Companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 2116-2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 曹仰锋. 世界三大“产业互联网平台”的战略与功能[J]. 清华管理评论, 2019(4): 44-51.
[5] 喻冬冬. 基于横向公平偏好的供应链知识共享激励与监督[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(1): 51-58, 102.
[6] 冯楠, 程志文, 冯海洋, 等. 供给方准入限制下的工业互联网平台数据共享激励策略优化设计研究[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(7): 24-42.
[7] 温双阁, 赵爽. 平台企业数据共享社会责任构造[J/OL]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 1-16.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1329.C.20250123.1924.002.html, 2025-03-13.
[8] 王倩倩, 陈强, 汪万, 等. 创新型平台治理和用户行为影响下互补者创新策略选择[J/OL]. 系统管理学报, 1-21.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1977.N.20241224.1610.002.html, 2025-03-13.
[9] 唐方成, 裴利娟, 董彩婷, 等. 数字平台的二元治理模式——价值共创视角下的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(5): 276-288.
[10] 孙海涛, 周奇锜. 平台数据垄断的监管困境与共享机制探析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2023(3): 131-139, 243.
[11] 何娜, 蒋忠中, 王健, 等. 考虑设备回收的服务型制造供应链契约选择与设计优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(11): 2927-2940.
[12] 王虹. 网络平台市场的质量信息披露策略与激励机制分析[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(3): 89-94.
[13] Han, H., Shen, J., Liu, B. and Han, H. (2022) Dynamic Incentive Mechanism for Large-Scale Projects Based on the Reputation Effects. Sage Open, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 徐碧霄, 刘迅, 刘德馨. 基于信号博弈的工程总承包联盟声誉激励研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2023, 37(4): 19-24.
[15] 金亮. 线下到线上O2O供应链线上推荐策略及激励机制设计[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(5): 242-253.
[16] 张旭梅, 王波, 刘益, 等. 基于第三方共享制造平台的供应链质量信息披露与激励机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(12): 278-287.
[17] Wan, X. and Qie, X. (2020) Poverty Alleviation Ecosystem Evolutionary Game on Smart Supply Chain Platform under the Government Financial Platform Incentive Mechanism. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 372, Article 112595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王勇, 张玮艺, 伍凌智. 论平台企业“开放中立”的治理原则[J]. 改革, 2022(4): 55-67.
[19] 赖雪梅, 聂佳佳. 风险规避对制造商电商平台销售模式选择的影响[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(4): 240-248.
[20] 陈雪, 李波, 吴爽. 需求信息不对称下考虑风险规避制造商的供应链决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(6): 234-249.
[21] 许明辉, 袁睢秋, 秦颖, 等. 基于委托代理理论的逆向供应链激励机制设计与回收模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(3): 297-313.
[22] 蔡建湖, 蒋乐, 杨梦园, 等. 信息不对称下考虑风险规避的绿色供应链博弈模型[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1-23.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2267.N.20231211.1158.016.html, 2024-10-12.
[23] 冯楠, 程志文, 冯海洋, 等. 供给方准入限制下的工业互联网平台数据共享激励策略优化设计研究[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(7): 24-42.
[24] 陈艳, 谢亚雯, 杜西津, 等. 基于声誉模型的多周期闭环供应链激励机制研究[J]. 系统科学学报, 2020, 28(2): 129-135.
[25] 任雪杰, 梁艺馨, 赵林度. “共享+”模式下平台生态价值共创策略与激励机制[J]. 管理工程学报, 2025, 39(2): 248-261.