AI赋能《信息技术导论》教学重构:基于DeepSeek的实践
AI Empowers the Teaching Reconstruction of “Introduction to Information Technology”: Practice Based on DeepSeek
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.144316, PDF,   
作者: 仇莫然*, 肖凯文, 郑莉萍:四川大学锦江学院计算机学院,四川 眉山;王一凡:甘肃科技馆,甘肃 兰州;杨 溯:科大讯飞股份有限公司,四川 成都
关键词: 智能教育虚实融合DeepSeek教学重构Intelligent Education Virtual-Real Integration DeepSeek Teaching Reconstruction
摘要: 针对《信息技术导论》课程内容滞后于技术发展、实训脱离真实场景、评价缺乏过程支持等痛点,本文构建了基于DeepSeek平台的“动态知识更新–虚实融合实践–个性成长追踪”教学模式。通过实时整合GitHub、arXiv等开源社区数据,设计知识动态更新机制,实现教学内容与行业实践的同步周期从3.2年缩短至2.1天;开发虚实融合实训平台,在普通浏览器中实现200 ms低延迟数字孪生映射,使设备调试成功率提升37%;构建多模态循证评价体系,通过多维学习画像实现精准学情诊断,教师识别学习困难的效率提升4倍。跨区域准实验表明,实验组在前沿技术认知准确率、长期职业竞争力等维度显著优于对照组。
Abstract: In response to the pain points of the course content of “Introduction to Information Technology” lagging behind technological development, practical training being out of touch with real scenarios, and lack of process support for evaluation, this paper constructs a teaching model of “dynamic knowledge update-virtual-real integration practice-personality growth tracking” based on the DeepSeek platform. By integrating open source community data such as GitHub and arXiv in real time, a knowledge dynamic update mechanism is designed to shorten the synchronization cycle between teaching content and industry practice from 3.2 years to 2.1 days; a virtual-real integration training platform is developed to achieve 200 ms low-latency digital twin mapping in ordinary browsers, which increases the success rate of equipment debugging by 37%; a multimodal evidence-based evaluation system is constructed to achieve accurate learning diagnosis through multi-dimensional learning portraits, and the efficiency of teachers identifying learning difficulties is increased by 4 times. Cross-regional quasi-experiments show that the experimental group is significantly better than the control group in terms of accuracy in frontier technology cognition and long-term professional competitiveness.
文章引用:仇莫然, 王一凡, 肖凯文, 郑莉萍, 杨溯. AI赋能《信息技术导论》教学重构:基于DeepSeek的实践[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(4): 502-511. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.144316

参考文献

[1] 何克抗. 信息技术与课程深层次整合理论[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2017.
[2] 祝智庭. 智慧教育新发展: 从翻转课堂到智慧课堂及智慧学习空间[J]. 开放教育研究, 2016, 22(1): 18-26.
[3] Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T. and Perfetti, C. (2012) The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 243-267.
[4] Baker, R.S. (2016) Stupid Tutoring Systems, Intelligent Humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 600-614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 黄荣怀, 林凉. 构建WebCL平台上的e-Tutor[C]//全球华人计算机教育应用大会. 第六届全球华人计算机教育应用大会论文集. 北京: 中央广播电视大学出版社, 2002: 309-315.
[6] Brennan, K. and Resnick, M. (2012) New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of Computational Thinking. Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, Raleigh, 29 February-3 March 2012, 56-63.
[7] 冉利龙, 李青. 基于模块化微型化教学资源的远程教育课程设计与开发——以“计算机应用基础”课程为例[J]. 高教研究(西南科技大学), 2022, 38(1): 65-69.
[8] Stevens, R. (2020) Digital Badges for STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis. Assessment in Education, 27, 328-345.
[9] Van Lehn, K. (2011) The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, 46, 197-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T.S. and Mayer, R.E. (2019) Adding Immersive Virtual Reality to a Science Lab Simulation Causes More Presence but Less Learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Siemens, G. (2013) Learning Analytics. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1380-1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Mollick, E.R. (2023) ChatGPT Is a Tipping Point for AI. Harvard Business Review, 101, 34-45.
[13] 何克抗. 2000年以来教学设计的新发展——对美国《教育传播与技术研究手册(第四版)》的学习与思考之一[J]. 开放教育研究, 2016, 22(6): 21-30.