生育信息浏览对大学生生育意愿的影响——育儿胜任感的中介作用
The Impact of Fertility Information Browsing on College Students’ Fertility Intentions—The Mediating Role of Parenting Sense of Competence
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.144325, PDF,   
作者: 程 成*, 袁治桃*, 贾挚豪, 黄 鹏#：空军军医大学军事医学心理学系，军事心理学教研室，陕西 西安
关键词: 生育信息；生育意愿；育儿胜任感；大学生；互联网；Fertility Information； Fertility Intention； Parenting Sense of Competence； University Students； Internet
摘要: 目的：研究旨在探讨互联网上的生育信息对生育意愿的影响。方法采用相关问卷对340名在校大学生进行调查，有效问卷314份。结果分析表明在互联网上浏览积极和消极生育信息对生育意愿的预测作用显著(β = 0.058, p < 0.001; β = −0.749, p < 0.001)。育儿胜任感对生育意愿的预测作用也显著(β = 0.019, p < 0.001)。结论：(1) 在互联网中浏览生育信息会对个人的生育意愿产生影响。浏览积极的生育信息会提高人们的生育意愿，浏览消极的生育信息会降低人们的生育意愿。其中，浏览消极生育信息的比浏览积极生育信息的更大。(2) 此外，育儿胜任感在浏览积极生育信息和生育意愿中起到中介作用，即在互联网上浏览积极的生育信息通过增强育儿胜任感进而增强生育意愿。
Abstract: Objective: The number of newborns in China is steadily decreasing, and people’s fertility intentions are generally low. Improving the fertility rate has become an urgent issue. Therefore, this study aims to explore the impact of online fertility information on fertility intentions and examine the mediating role of parenting self-efficacy. Methods A survey was conducted with 340 university students using questionnaires on fertility intentions, fertility information, and parenting self-efficacy. A total of 314 valid questionnaires were collected, with an average age of 21.24 years. Results browsing positive and negative fertility information on the internet has a significant predictive effect on fertility intentions (β = 0.058, p < 0.001; β = −0.749, p < 0.001). The predictive effect of parenting self-efficacy on fertility intentions is also significant (β = 0.019, p < 0.001). Conclusion: (1) Browsing fertility-related information on the internet affects individuals’ fertility intentions. Browsing negative fertility information decreases fertility intentions. The impact of negative fertility information is greater than that of positive fertility information. (2) Moreover, parenting self-efficacy plays a mediating role between browsing positive fertility information and fertility intentions, meaning that browsing positive fertility information enhances parenting self-efficacy, which in turn increases fertility intentions.
文章引用：程成, 袁治桃, 贾挚豪, 黄鹏. 生育信息浏览对大学生生育意愿的影响——育儿胜任感的中介作用[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(4): 577-587. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.144325

参考文献

[1] 中国人口普查年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2023.
[2] 第七次人口普查数据[EB/OL].
https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/d7c/, 2021-11-26.
[3] 第53次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》发布[J]. 传媒论坛, 2024, 7(6): 120.
[4] Wajcman, J. (2014). Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. University of Chicago Press.[CrossRef] 
[5] 姚从容, 吴帆, 李建民. 我国城乡居民生育意愿调查研究综述: 2000-2008 [J]. 人口学刊, 2010(2): 17-22.
[6] 侯佳伟, 黄四林, 辛自强, 等. 中国人口生育意愿变迁: 1980-2011 [J]. 中国社会科学, 2014(4): 78-97+206.
[7] Bulatao, R.A. (1982) The Transition in the Value of Children and the Fertility Transition. In: Höhn, C. and Mackensen, R., Eds., Determinants of Fertility Trends: The Theories Re-Examined, Ordina Éditions, 95-112.
[8] Becker, G.S. and Barro, R.J. (1988) A Reformulation of the Economic Theory of Fertility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 顾宝昌. 生育意愿、生育行为和生育水平[J]. 人口研究, 2011, 35(2): 43-59.
[10] 张霞, 夏巧娟. 生育意愿与生育率研究进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2018(12): 108-120.
[11] 张亮. 城市居民的二胎生育意愿及影响因素[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2011(5): 92-96.
[12] 张良驯, 赵丹丹, 范策. 基于自我决定理论的青年生育意愿缺失研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(9): 36-43.
[13] 茅倬彦, 罗昊. 符合二胎政策妇女的生育意愿和生育行为差异——基于计划行为理论的实证研究[J]. 人口研究, 2013, 37(1): 84-93.
[14] Chee, R.M., Capper, T.S. and Muurlink, O.T. (2023) The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Pregnancy, Birth, and Early Parenting Experiences: A Systematic Review. Midwifery, 120, Article ID: 103623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Francesco, C.B., Osea, G. and Luca, S. (2019) Does Broadband Internet Affect fertility? Population Studies, 73, 297-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Guldi, M. and Herbst, C.M. (2016) Offline Effects of Online Connecting: The Impact of Broadband Diffusion on Teen Fertility Decisions. Journal of Population Economics, 30, 69-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Cleland, J. and Wilson, C. (1987) Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View. Population Studies, 41, 5-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 李飚, 赖德胜, 高曼. 互联网使用对生育率的影响研究[J]. 南方人口, 2021, 36(2): 65-80.
[19] 王小洁, 聂文洁, 刘鹏程. 互联网使用与个体生育意愿——基于信息成本和家庭代际视角的分析[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(10): 110-124.
[20] 梁丽霞, 黄燕. 互联网使用对婚姻稳定性和生育意愿的影响——基于CGSS2021数据的实证分析[J]. 人口与社会, 1-15.
[21] 张洪, 刘晓丹, 王芹华, 等. 国内外父母育儿胜任感的研究进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2016(16): 3.
[22] Zitzmann, J., Rombold-George, L., Renneberg, B. et al. (2024) Emotion Regulation, Parenting, and Psychopathology: A Systematic Review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 27, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Suwansujarid, T., Vatanasomboon, P., Gaylord, N., et al. (2013) Validation of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale in Fathers: Thai Version. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 44, 916-926.
[24] Ngai, F., Chan, S. and Holroyd, E. (2007) Translation and Validation of a Chinese Version of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale in Chinese Mothers. Nursing Research, 56, 348-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 钟尧. 中国居民生育意愿的时空演化、影响因素及对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2023.
[26] 黄君洁, 邱婷. 社交网络中的亲子信息对生育意愿的影响研究[J]. 人口与社会, 2022, 38(6): 79-93.
[27] Yang, H. (2020) Do SNSs Really Make Us Happy? The Effects of Writing and Reading via SNSs on Subjective Well-being. Telematics and Informatics, 50, Article ID: 101384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] 杨晓, 高玲玲, 张振香等. 中文版育儿胜任感量表在产妇中应用的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(7): 881-885.
[29] 宁艳超, 高学海, 吴桂芬. 国外育儿胜任感影响因素的研究现状[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2016, 22(4): 590-592.
[30] 金汝佳. 基于Kruskal-Wallis检验对我国各地区农村财产性收入差异的研究[J]. 企业导报, 2015(14): 16-17.
[31] 肖庆业. 农村教师培训需求意愿及其影响因素实证研究——基于有序多分类Logistic回归模型[J]. 基础教育, 2020, 17(6): 21-32.
[32] 高虒源. 网络舆情中的生育态度及其影响因素研究——基于2012-2021年新浪微博、网易新闻、知乎平台的大数据分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2022.
[33] 方力维, 李祚山, 向琦祺, 等. “全面两孩”政策下“80后”父母的再生育动机及其影响因素调查[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2017, 25(10): 658-661.
[34] 朱洪翠, 刘冰. 新时代大学生生育观研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2020, 38(4): 33-39.
[35] 王子仪, 林治, 彭琛琛, 邱璐薇, 叶梦瑶. “三孩”政策下当代大学生生育意愿的现状与思考——基于764份线上调查问卷的分析[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)社会科学, 2022(12): 52-55.
[36] 郑真真. 生育意愿研究及其现实意义——兼以江苏调查为例[J]. 学海, 2011(2): 10-18.
[37] Lee, J.Y., Lee, S.J., Chang, O.D. et al. (2024) Low-Income Fathers Are Emotionally Resilient: A Qualitative Exploration of Paternal Emotions across Early Parenting. Infant Mental Health Journal, 45, 645-669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] 穆光宗, 陈俊杰. 中国农民生育需求的层次结构[J]. 人口研究, 1996(2): 25-33.
[39] Shin, Y.S. and Niv, Y. (2021) Biased Evaluations Emerge from Inferring Hidden Causes. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1180-1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] 臧少敏, 绳宇. 初产妇产后育儿效能影响因素的研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2010, 18(7): 801.

为你推荐