大量输血对创伤患者炎症标志物、血清电解质、凝血功能及免疫功能的影响
The Impact of Massive Blood Transfusion on Inflammatory Markers, Serum Electrolytes, Coagulation Function, and Immune Function in Trauma Patients
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1541222, PDF,   
作者: 李文娟:青岛大学基础医学院免疫学系,山东 青岛;成武县人民医院输血科,山东 菏泽;刘 帅, 马金平:菏泽市立医院输血科,山东 菏泽
关键词: 大量输血创伤炎症电解质凝血免疫功能Massive Transfusion Trauma Inflammation Electrolytes Coagulation Immune Function
摘要: 目的:本研究探讨大量输血(massive transfusion, MT)对创伤患者炎症标志物、血清电解质、凝血及免疫功能的影响。方法:研究纳入我院急诊科收治的136例创伤患者,分为MT组(41例)和一般输血组(对照组95例)。比较两组患者输血前后各指标变化情况,包括炎症标志物:白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、白细胞介素-8 (IL-8)、粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1 (MCP-1)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR);电解质:K+、Na+、Cl、Ca2+和TCO2;凝血指标:PT、APTT、TT、FIB和PLT;免疫指标:CD3+ T、CD4+ T和CD4+/CD8+。结果:输血后,MT组IL-6、IL-8和MCP-1显著高于对照组(P < 0.001),NLR、PLR和G-CSF无显著变化(P > 0.05)。电解质方面,MT组K+、Ca2+和TCO2浓度明显降低(P < 0.001),Na+数值两组均升高且MT组更显著(P < 0.05),Cl水平无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。凝血功能上,MT组PLT、FIB数值降低,PT、APTT、TT时间延长(P < 0.001)。免疫功能方面,MT组CD3+ T、CD4+ T和CD4+/CD8+显著降低(P < 0.05)。结论:MT可能加重创伤患者炎症反应、电解质紊乱、凝血功能障碍及免疫功能抑制,需加强监测与干预。
Abstract: Objective: This study investigates the impact of massive transfusion (MT) on inflammatory markers, serum electrolytes, coagulation, and immune function in trauma patients. Methods: A total of 136 trauma patients admitted to the emergency department of our hospital were enrolled and divided into the MT group (41 cases) and the general transfusion group (control group, 95 cases). The changes in various indicators before and after transfusion were compared between the two groups, including inflammatory markers: interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR); electrolytes: K+, Na+, Cl, Ca2+, and TCO2; coagulation parameters: PT, APTT, TT, FIB, and PLT; and immune parameters: CD3+ T, CD4+ T, and CD4+/CD8+. Results: After transfusion, the MT group showed significantly higher levels of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 compared to the control group (P < 0.001), while NLR, PLR, and G-CSF showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). In terms of electrolytes, the MT group exhibited significantly lower concentrations of K+, Ca2+, and TCO2 (P < 0.001), while Na+ levels increased in both groups, with a more pronounced increase in the MT group (P < 0.05). Cl levels showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Regarding coagulation function, the MT group had reduced PLT and FIB levels, and prolonged PT, APTT, and TT times (P < 0.001). In terms of immune function, the MT group showed significant reductions in CD3+ T, CD4+ T, and CD4+/CD8+ ratios (P < 0.05). Conclusion: MT may exacerbate inflammatory responses, electrolyte imbalances, coagulation dysfunction, and immune suppression in trauma patients, necessitating enhanced monitoring and intervention.
文章引用:李文娟, 刘帅, 马金平. 大量输血对创伤患者炎症标志物、血清电解质、凝血功能及免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(4): 2632-2638. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1541222

参考文献

[1] Vos, T., Lim, S.S., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K.M., Abbasi, M., Abbasifard, M., et al. (2020) Global Burden of 369 Diseases and Injuries in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 396, 1204-1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Cannon, J.W. (2018) Hemorrhagic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine, 378, 370-379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Butwick, A., Lyell, D. and Goodnough, L. (2020) How Do I Manage Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage? Transfusion, 60, 897-907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Hashish, K., Hoki, M., Hipbone, M., et al. (2022) Association between Transfusion Volume and Survival Outcome Following Trauma: Insight into the Limit of Transfusion from an Analysis of Nationwide Trauma Data. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 93, 572-578.
[5] 卢尧, 李阳, 张雷英, 等. 严重创伤患者紧急救治血液保障模式与输血策略中国专家共识(2024版) [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2024, 40(10): 865-881.
[6] 高明, 周虎, 郭瑁, 等. 《欧洲创伤性严重出血和凝血病管理指南(第6版)》解读 [J]. 中国输血杂志, 2024, 37(3): 357-368.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 临床输血技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[8] 王天兵, 胡畔. 创伤数据库的历史及我国创伤数据库的建设[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2024(12): 1013-1018.
[9] 中国人民解放军急救医学专业委员会, 中国医师协会急诊医师分会, 北京急诊医学学会, 等. 创伤失血性休克中国急诊专家共识(2023) [J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2023, 43(11): 841-854.
[10] American College of Surgeons (2018) AILS-Advanced Trauma Life Support-Student Course Manual. 10th Edition, American College of Surgeons.
[11] 黄华华, 谭彬宾, 周吉成. 大量输血程序的研究进展[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2023(10): 967-970.
[12] Saviano, A., Perotti, C., Zanza, C., Longhitano, Y., Ojetti, V., Franceschi, F., et al. (2024) Blood Transfusion for Major Trauma in Emergency Department. Diagnostics, 14, Article No. 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 王静, 宋进进. 不同比例悬浮红细胞及新鲜冰冻血浆对急性创伤大量输血患者凝血纤溶功能、预后的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2024, 9(35): 118-121.
[14] 赵晓慧, 苏淑伶, 陶庆春. 滤过白细胞的输血对重症创伤患者T淋巴细胞亚群及炎症的影响[J] . 临床和实验医学杂志, 2022, 21(6): 660-664.
[15] Saccomanno, F.R., Gates, J., Jacobs, L., Kuti, J., Ricaurte, D. and Keating, J. (2022) Infection and Antibiotic Agents in Bleeding Trauma Patients: A Review of Available Literature. Surgical Infections, 23, 332-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Martinez Ugarte, S., Fajemisin, M.O., Guy-Frank, C.J., Klugh, J.M., Zhang, X., Fox, E.E., et al. (2025) Is There an Association between Inflammatory Biomarkers and Organ Space Surgical Site Infection after Emergency Laparotomy in Massively Transfused Trauma Patients? The American Journal of Surgery, 244, Article ID: 116106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Delgado-Miguel, C., Muñoz-Serrano, A.J., Moratilla, L., Miguel-Ferrero, M., Delgado, B., Camps, J., et al. (2023) Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Surgical Site Infection in Acute Appendicitis. Translational Pediatrics, 12, 552-559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 石岚, 高丽, 郭雯玉. 大量输血对严重创伤患者血清电解质及炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 中国基层医药, 2022, 29(6): 872-876.
[19] Shibahashi, K., Aoki, M., Hikone, M. and Sugiyama, K. (2023) Association between Transfusion Volume and Survival Outcome Following Trauma: Insight into the Limit of Transfusion from an Analysis of Nationwide Trauma Registry in Japan. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 96, 742-748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 张宣丽, 岳彩然, 樊丽娟. 大量输血患者输血前后电解质及肝肾功能变化分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020(49): 2653-2654.
[21] Zeineddin, A., Wu, F., Chao, W., Zou, L., Vesselinov, R., Chipman, A.M., et al. (2022) Biomarkers of Endothelial Cell Dysfunction Persist Beyond Resuscitation in Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 93, 572-578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 李思萌, 李碧娟, 张志敏. 大量输血后血钙的变化及输血后低钙血症的影响因素[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2018, 20(4): 27-31.
[23] 汪海华, 王瑜芬. 血清电解质动态检测对大量输血患者的安全性评估作用[J]. 河北医药, 2022, 44(14): 2189-2191.
[24] 张艺璇, 袁红斌. 严重创伤患者的快速评估和麻醉管理要点[J]. 上海医学, 2024(6): 335-338.
[25] Zanza, C., Romenskaya, T., Racca, F., Rocca, E., Piccolella, F., Piccioni, A., et al. (2023) Severe Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Critical Illness. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, Article No. 7118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 赵锁, 王斌, 张伟, 等. 急性创伤性凝血病病理生理机制的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2023(6): 1187-1192.
[27] 杨斌, 夏克明, 夏风琼. 严重创伤患者大量输血治疗对凝血功能的影响[J]. 中国实用医药, 2024, 19(21): 170-172.
[28] 潘建虹, 潘笑, 王陈, 等. 严重创伤患者免疫功能动态变化规律及其与创伤感染的关系[J]. 现代实用医学, 2023, 35(9): 1220-1224.
[29] 翟晓莲, 王有梅, 张晓霞, 等. 以血栓弹力图为导向成分输血对胃癌合并消化道急性大出血患者术中用血量、免疫功能及预后影响[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2023, 51(6): 632-634.
[30] 陈皆锋, 潘郑斌, 丁洁岚, 等. 两种不同输血方式对行剖宫产术产妇凝血功能和细胞免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(8): 1359-1364.
[31] 全洪兵, 钟建, 陈宇宁, 等. 不同成分输血比例对严重创伤输血患者凝血功能、免疫功能及预后的影响[J]. 中国实用医药, 2021, 16(17): 115-117.
[32] 戴青云, 杜季梅. 大量输血后创伤患者血清电解质及免疫功能、炎症反应水平变化观察[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2024, 29(11): 2149-2152.