成年子女的双元孝道信念与孝道焦虑的关系:一般未来时间洞察力的中介作用
The Relationship between Adult Children’s Dual Filial Piety and Filial Anxiety: The Mediation Effect of Future Time Perspective
摘要: 目的:探究成年子女双元孝道信念对孝道焦虑的影响,以及一般未来时间洞察力在其间的中介作用。方法:采用方便抽样法,采用双元孝道信念量表、孝道焦虑量表和一般未来时间洞察力量表,于2024年6月~7月在社交网络平台(如QQ、微信、豆瓣、小红书、微博等)上共收取460有效问卷。结果:① 相互性孝道信念显著负向预测孝道能力焦虑,显著正向预测孝道情感焦虑;② 权威性孝道信念显著正向预测孝道情感焦虑,但与孝道能力焦虑的关系不显著;③ 相互性孝道信念和权威性孝道信念均可以显著正向预测一般未来时间洞察力;④ 一般未来时间洞察力的部分维度在双元孝道信念与孝道焦虑的关系间起到中介作用。结论:双元孝道信念可以直接影响成年子女孝道焦虑,也可通过一般未来时间洞察力间接影响孝道焦虑。
Abstract: Objective: Analyzing the impact of adult children’s dual filial piety on filial anxiety, and the mediating role of future time perspective. Methods: A convenience sampling was employed. The Dual Filial Piety Scale, the Filial Anxiety Scale, and the General Future Time Perspective Scale was used. From June to July 2024, a total of 460 valid questionnaires were collected through social media platforms (such as QQ, WeChat, Douban, Xiaohongshu, and Weibo). Results: (1) Reciprocal filial piety significantly negatively predicts FAA and significantly positively predict FAB; (2) Authoritarian filial piety significantly positively predict FAB, but the relationship with FAA is not significant; (3) Both reciprocal and authoritarian filial piety can significantly positively predict general future time perspective; (4) Some dimensions of general future time perspective play a mediating role in the relationship between dual filial piety and filial anxiety. Conclusion: Dual filial piety beliefs can directly influence filial anxiety among adult children, and can also indirectly affect filial anxiety through the mediating role of future time perspective.
文章引用:高书萍, 余林 (2025). 成年子女的双元孝道信念与孝道焦虑的关系:一般未来时间洞察力的中介作用. 心理学进展, 15(4), 572-581. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.154241

参考文献

[1] (2024). 2023年度国家老龄事业发展公报. 中华人民共和国民政部. https://www.mca.gov.cn/n152/n165/c1662004999980001752/content.html
[2] 包广华, 汪薇, 吐马丽丝•卡哈尔, 肖灿, 洪建中(2024). 双元孝道对成年身份建构的影响: 基于成年初显期的潜在剖面分析. 心理科学, 47(4), 848-854.
[3] 段鑫星, 程嘉(2007). 成人初显期理论及其评述. 当代青年研究, (2), 20-27.
[4] 傅绪荣, 汪凤炎, 陈翔, 魏新东(2016). 孝道: 理论、测量、变迁及与相关变量的关系. 心理科学进展, 24(2), 293-304.
[5] (2022). 国务院印发《“十四五”国家老龄事业发展和养老服务体系规划》. 滚动新闻 中国政府网. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-02/21/content_5674877.htm
[6] 李启明(2014). 孝道的代际传递及其对老人的积极效应. 博士学位论文, 武汉: 华中科技大学.
[7] 宋其争(2004). 大学生未来时间洞察力的理论和实证研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆: 西南师范大学.
[8] 余益兵(2023). 家庭孝道传统对农村青少年积极情绪适应的链式中介模型——基于变量中心和个体中心的分析视角. 集美大学学报, 24(6), 35-49.
[9] 袁佳黎, 刘飞, 张文宏(2022). 孝道观念、代际支持与青年群体赡养行为的变迁: 2006-2017. 中国青年研究, (1), 93-103.
[10] 张韵, 陆杰华(2021). 正式照料抑或非正式照料: 照料模式对高龄老人临终照料成本的影响. 南方人口, 36(1), 68-80.
[11] Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014). Caregiver Burden: A Clinical Review. JAMA, 311, 1052-1060.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Altan-Atalay, A., Özarslan, I., & Biriz, B. (2020). Negative Urgency and Time Perspective: Interactive Associations with Anxiety and Depression. The Journal of General Psychology, 147, 293-307.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Devel-opment from the Late Teens through the Twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). The New Life Stage of Emerging Adulthood at Ages 18-29 Years: Implications for Mental Health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 569-576.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Boo, S., Wang, C., & Kim, M. (2021). Career Adaptability, Fu-ture Time Perspective, and Career Anxiety among Undergraduate Students: A Cross-National Comparison. Journal of Hos-pitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, Article ID: 100328.[CrossRef
[16] Cicirelli, V. G. (1988). A Measure of Filial Anxiety Regarding An-ticipated Care of Elderly Parents. The Gerontologist, 28, 478-482.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Hui, T., Yuen, M., & Chen, G. (2018). Career‐Related Filial Piety and Career Adaptability in Hong Kong University Students. The Career Development Quarterly, 66, 358-370.[CrossRef
[18] Jin, L. (2009). The Role of Per-sonality and Filial Piety in the Career Commitment Process among Chinese University Students. Ph.D. Master’s Thesis, The University of Hong Kong. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record/b43085751
[19] Jung, H., Park, I., & Rie, J. (2015). Future Time Perspective and Career Decisions: The Moderating Effects of Affect Spin. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 46-55.[CrossRef
[20] Laditka, S. B., & Pappas-Rogich, M. (2001). Anticipatory Care-giving Anxiety among Older Women and Men. Journal of Women & Aging, 13, 3-18.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Li, J., Liu, H., van der Heijden, B., & Guo, Z. (2021). The Role of Filial Piety in the Relationships between Work Stress, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, Article 714.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Morais, D. M. D. C. B., Faria, C. M. G. M., & Fernandes, L. P. N. S. (2019). Intergenerational Caregiving: The Role of Attachment and Mental Representation of Caregiving in Filial Anxiety of Middle-Aged Children. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 17, 468-487.[CrossRef
[23] Myers, E. G., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (1995). Brief Report: Filial Anxiety in Mothers and Daughters: Cross-Validation of Cicirelli’s (1988) Filial Anxiety Scale. Journal of Adult Develop-ment, 2, 137-145.[CrossRef
[24] Pan, Y., Chen, R., & Yang, D. (2022). The Relationship between Filial Piety and Caregiver Burden among Adult Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Geriatric Nurs-ing, 43, 113-123.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Rupprecht, F. S., Martin, K., Kamin, S. T., & Lang, F. R. (2022). COVID-19 and Perceiving Finitude: Associations with Future Time Perspective, Death Anxiety, and Ideal Life Expectancy. Psychology and Aging, 37, 260-271.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Wu, C. (2022). Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39, 1739-1758.[CrossRef
[27] Wu, C., & Yeh, K. (2021). Self-sacrifice Is Not the Only Way to Practice Filial Piety for Chinese Adolescents in Conflict with Their Parents. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 661335.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Yeh, K., & Bedford, O. (2003). A Test of the Dual Filial Piety Model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 215-228.[CrossRef