“双减”政策下杭州市中小学家长教育心理焦虑的统计分析
Statistical Analysis of Educational Psychological Anxiety among Parents of Primary and Secondary School Students in Hangzhou under the “Double Reduction” Policy
摘要: 目的:为分析“双减”政策下杭州市中小学家长的教育心理焦虑状况,探讨政策对家长焦虑的影响因素和内在机制,并根据焦虑类型对家长进行分类,以提供针对性的教育支持建议。方法:采用分层随机抽样方法,对杭州市各城区中小学家长进行问卷调查。运用因子分析和Kmeans模型分析家长教育心理焦虑变化的影响因素。结果:调查共获得814份有效问卷,因子分析和Kmeans聚类分析结果表明:(1) “双减”政策实施、家庭年收入对家长教育焦虑变化有显著性影响;(2) 教育心理焦虑主要受教育历程担忧、学习过程焦虑、健康学习关切和教育成果关注四个因素的影响;(3) 通过Kmeans聚类分析,将家长分为三种类型:健康成果型、学习关怀型和教育轨迹型;(4) 健康成果型家长主要关注孩子的身心健康和教育成果,学习关怀型家长注重孩子的学习方法和健康状态,教育轨迹型家长则更加关注教育路径和孩子在学习过程中的身心健康。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the educational psychological anxiety status of primary and secondary school parents in Hangzhou under the Double Reduction policy, explore the influencing factors and internal mechanisms of the policy on parental anxiety, and classify parents based on anxiety types to provide targeted educational support suggestions. Methods: The stratified random sampling method was adopted to conduct a questionnaire survey among parents of primary and secondary schools in various urban districts of Hangzhou. Factor analysis and Kmeans model were utilized to analyze the influencing factors of changes in parental educational psychological anxiety. Results: A total of 814 valid questionnaires were obtained in the survey. The results of factor analysis and Kmeans clustering analysis indicated that: (1) The implementation of the “Double Reduction” policy and the annual family income had a significant influence on the changes in parental educational anxiety; (2) Educational psychological anxiety was mainly affected by four factors: concerns about the educational process, anxiety in the learning process, concerns about healthy learning, and concerns about educational outcomes; (3) Through Kmeans clustering analysis, parents were classified into three types: the healthy outcome type, the learning care type, and the educational trajectory type; (4) The healthy outcome type of parents mainly focused on their children’s physical and mental health and educational outcomes. The learning care type of parents emphasized their children’s learning methods and health status. The educational trajectory type of parents paid more attention to the educational path and their children’s physical and mental health during the learning process.
文章引用:卢山, 楼佳, 田瑞琴. “双减”政策下杭州市中小学家长教育心理焦虑的统计分析[J]. 统计学与应用, 2025, 14(4): 283-290. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2025.144109

参考文献

[1] 付卫东, 胡依然, 张杉. “双减”政策实施后谁在参加中小学学科类校外培训——基于6省30县(市、区)的调查[J]. 教育科学研究, 2024(7): 22-28.
[2] 邹宝玲, 张铭凯. “双减”政策认知对家长教育焦虑的影响[J]. 教育科学研究, 2024(7): 13-21.
[3] 王烨晖, 秦可心, 辛涛. “双减”背景下作业减负增效的实证研究[J]. 中国考试, 2024(7): 53-63.
[4] 宋乃庆, 沈光辉. STEAM教育助力“双减”政策落地的现实困境与可为路径[J]. 现代教育管理, 2024(6): 43-50.
[5] 李佳哲, 姚继军. “双减”背景下家校合作对中小学生发展质量的影响研究[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2024(3): 50-61.
[6] 付卫东, 郭三伟. “双减”政策落地与新的教育不公平——基于6省30个县(市、区)的调查[J]. 现代教育管理, 2024(4): 42-51.
[7] 陈蕾, 罗阳. “双减”背景下县域校外补习市场的监管困境与治理路径[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 12(2): 105-116.
[8] 祁占勇, 方洁, 任姝怡. “双减”格局下家长教育焦虑纾解了吗?——基于中国29省(区、市)的实证调查[J]. 中国远程教育, 2024(4): 28-46.
[9] 杨燕. “双减”政策落地的结构化困境与破解[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2024, 22(2): 99-105.
[10] 邹红军, 田雪. “双减”来敲门: 教育时间的圆性转向[J]. 教育科学, 2024, 40(2): 31-37.
[11] 覃立, 黎吉权. “双减”政策下体育教育公平审思: 意义解读、问题防范与发展路向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 120-126.
[12] 谌舒山. “双减”背景下学科类隐形变异培训: 现象、成因与治理[J]. 现代基础教育研究, 2024, 54(2): 84-88.
[13] 薛海平, 张小莉. “双减”政策执行中的网络舆情监测研究[J]. 教育发展研究, 2024, 44(8): 50-60.
[14] 丁煌, 王巍熹. “双减”政策执行阻滞: 发生逻辑与消解策略[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 48(2): 17-26.
[15] 李勉. “双减”背景下中小学办学质量评价体系构建[J]. 中国考试, 2024(3): 28-36.
[16] 薛海平, 黄为. 义务教育课后服务质量保障: 发达国家的经验与启示[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(1): 153-166+172.
[17] 魏易, 康乐. “双减”政策短期效果评估: 基于中国教育财政家庭调查的分析[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2024, 22(1): 155-173+192.
[18] 姜雨晴, 张学波, 林书兵, 等. 数据赋能作业减负: 内在逻辑、现实困境与实践路向[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2024(1): 25-30.
[19] 景玉慧, 沈书生. 方法与模式: “双减”背景下学习空间赋能课堂教学研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2024, 45(1): 114-121.
[20] 余晖, 陈心彧. “双减”政策执行偏差: 类型、动因及展望[J]. 中国教育法制评论, 2023(2): 223-233.
[21] 朱小园. 高中学生考前焦虑相关因素及对策研究[J]. 中国健康教育, 2013, 29(9): 836-837.
[22] 肖青, 苏萍, 黄佩贞. 社区中老年居民健康信息素养与行为习惯的相关性研究及影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2023, 39(11): 1039-1045.
[23] 朱广荣, 余小鸣, 王嘉, 等. 小学健康教育现状及不同模式的比较研究[J]. 中国健康教育, 2005, 21(9): 671-673.
[24] Weng, J. (2024) How Can Policy Enactment Help Us to Understand the Influence of the Implementation of “Double Reduction” Policy on Chinese School Teachers in Compulsory Education? Creative Education, 15, 1210-1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Xie, R., Wang, X., Ding, Y., Chen, Y. and Ding, W. (2024) The Impact of Parental Autonomy Support on Family Adaptation in the Context of “double Reduction”: The Mediating Role of Parent-Child Communication and Cohesion. Behavioral Sciences, 14, Article 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]