中国与RCEP成员国贸易隐含镍资源转移及公平性研究
Research on Implicit Nickel Resource Transfer and Equity in China’s Trade with RCEP Member Countries
摘要: 镍矿石作为一种战略性矿产资源,是传统制造业和新能源产业发展的关键金属。但当前中国镍资源供需不匹配,对外依存度高,在与RCEP成员国贸易联系日益密切的背景下,研究中国与其贸易公平性尤为重要。基于此,本文利用2021年Eora数据库,使用多区域投入产出模型,定量分析中国和RCEP成员国贸易隐含镍和增加值及其公平性。研究表明:(1) 中国是RCEP范围内最大的贸易隐含镍消费国,澳大利亚和印度尼西亚是最大的隐含镍净流出国;(2) 中国同时为隐含镍和增加值最大净流出国,受到资源消耗和增加值流失的不公平;(3) 纳入全球主要经济体后,获得贸易增加值和镍资源流入双重收益的多为欧美发达国家,而RCEP欠发达国家则多遭受损失;(4) 美国在国际贸易中是增加值最大获益国,中国是第二大贸易增加值净流出国,主要流向英美等发达国家。
Abstract: As a strategic mineral resource, nickel ore is a key metal for the development of traditional manufacturing and new energy industries. However, the current mismatch between supply and demand of nickel resources in China and the high degree of external dependence make it particularly important to study the fairness of China’s trade with its RCEP member countries against the backdrop of the increasingly close trade links with them. Based on this, this paper utilizes the 2021 Eora database and uses a multi-regional input-output model to quantitatively analyze the implied nickel and value added of trade between China and RCEP member countries and its fairness. The study shows that (1) China is the largest consumer of trade-implied nickel within RCEP, and Australia and Indonesia are the largest net outflow of implied nickel; (2) China is the largest net outflow of both implied nickel and value-added, and suffers from the inequity of resource depletion and loss of value-added; (3) after the inclusion of the major economies of the world, the ones who gained the double benefits of trade value-added and nickel resource inflow are mostly the European and American developed countries, while RCEP underdeveloped countries suffer losses; (4) the United States is the largest beneficiary of value added in international trade, and China is the second largest net outflow of trade value added, mainly to developed countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States.
文章引用:阮金月, 张晓燕, 刘晓萌, 王颖, 侍进. 中国与RCEP成员国贸易隐含镍资源转移及公平性研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(4): 1942-1952. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1441092

参考文献

[1] 邸敬涵, 温宗国. 资源产品贸易的环境影响及隐含环境流分析——以镍资源为例[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(3): 612-625.
[2] Wiedmann, T. (2009) A First Empirical Comparison of Energy Footprints Embodied in Trade—MRIO versus Plum. Ecological Economics, 68, 1975-1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 陆旸. 从开放宏观的角度看环境污染问题: 一个综述[J]. 经济研究, 2012(2): 146-158.
[4] 鲍洋. “金砖国家”引进FDI的环境效应比较研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2012(8): 128-136.
[5] Giljum, S., Wieland, H., Lutter, S., Bruckner, M., Wood, R., Tukker, A., et al. (2016) Identifying Priority Areas for European Resource Policies: A MRIO-Based Material Footprint Assessment. Journal of Economic Structures, 5, 17-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 王菲, 李娟. 中国对日本出口贸易中的隐含碳排放及结构分解分析[J]. 经济经纬, 2012(4): 61-65.
[7] 陈楠, 刘学敏. 垂直专业化下中日贸易“隐含碳”实证研究[J]. 统计研究, 2016, 33(3): 80-87.
[8] Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, H., Wang, S., Zhang, Y. and Cao, Y. (2018) Economic Benefits and Environmental Costs of China’s Exports: A Comparison with the USA Based on Network Analysis. China & World Economy, 26, 106-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 潘安, 谢奇灼, 戴岭. 中国出口贸易利益与环境成本的失衡[J]. 环境经济研究, 2019(3): 10-29.
[10] Banga, R. (2014) Linking into Global Value Chains Is Not Sufficient: Do You Export Domestic Value Added Contents? Journal of Economic Integration, 29, 267-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Fu, R., Peng, K., Wang, P., Zhong, H., Chen, B., Zhang, P., et al. (2023) Tracing Metal Footprints via Global Renewable Power Value Chains. Nature Communications, 14, Article No. 3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 邢贞成, 王济干, 冯奎双, 等. 国际贸易中碳排放与增加值的虚拟转移及其不公平性研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(8): 16-24+138.
[13] 陈志勇, 朱清, 邹谢华, 等. “双碳”背景下镍资源产业链发展趋势研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2024(10): 1-12.
[14] 倪平鹏, 蒙运兵, 杨斌. 我国稀土资源开采利用现状及保护性开发战略[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2010(10): 13-20.
[15] 邢佳韵, 张晓鹤, 陈其慎, 等. “二元消费”影响下的镍供需形式分析[J]. 地球学报, 2021, 42(2): 251-257.
[16] 路长远, 鲁雄刚, 邹星礼, 等. 中国镍矿资源现状及技术进展[J]. 自然杂志, 2015, 37(4): 269-277.
[17] 崔伟杰. 全球镍资源产业供需格局分析及预测[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
[18] Kowasch, M., Bouard, S. and Batterbury, S. (2020) The Geopolitical Ecology of New Caledonia: Territorial Re-Ordering, Mining, and Indigenous Economic Development. Journal of Political Ecology, 27, 594-611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Yu, S., Duan, H. and Cheng, J. (2021) An Evaluation of the Supply Risk for China’s Strategic Metallic Mineral Resources. Resources Policy, 70, Article ID: 101891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 曾祥婷, 许虹, 田尤, 等. 中国镍资源产业现状及可持续发展策略[J]. 资源与产业, 2015(4): 94-99.
[21] 王珂, 夏启繁. 产业链视角下中国关键金属镍贸易格局演化[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(3): 40-55.
[22] Huang, C., Vause, J., Ma, H., Li, Y. and Yu, C. (2014) Substance Flow Analysis for Nickel in Mainland China in 2009. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 450-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Zeng, X., Zheng, H., Gong, R., Eheliyagoda, D. and Zeng, X. (2018) Uncovering the Evolution of Substance Flow Analysis of Nickel in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 210-215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Wallerstein, I. (1976) Semi-Peripheral Countries and the Contemporary World Crisis. Theory and Society, 3, 461-483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef