汇报研讨式课堂教学的量表评价方法
Rubric-Based Evaluation Method for Reporting Seminar Classroom Teaching
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2025.134280, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王家宝, 徐伟光*, 潘志松, 苗 壮：陆军工程大学指挥控制工程学院，江苏 南京
关键词: 评价量表；教学效果；汇报研讨；实践能力；Rubrics； Teaching Effectiveness； Reporting Seminar； Practical Ability
摘要: 汇报研讨是培养学生开展创新研究必不可少的实践活动，为了培养学生创新思维，提升自主学习、汇报演讲等实践能力，提出引入评价量表对汇报研讨式课堂效果进行评价。设计了面向汇报研讨式课堂教学的评价量表构建方法，以文献阅读汇报研讨为主要形式，探索实践了利用量表评价开展汇报研讨式课堂教学效果的评价。实践结果表明，评价量表能更具体客观全面地反馈学生汇报研讨的效果，既能为学生提供形成性评价成绩，又能帮助学生认知并改进不足，还能为老师提供及时的教学反馈。
Abstract: The reporting seminar is an indispensable practical activity to train students to conduct innovative research. To develop students’ creative thinking and enhance practical abilities of independent learning and reporting, we introduced the rubric approach to evaluate the effectiveness of reporting seminar classroom. A rubric approach for reporting seminar classroom teaching was designed, and the evaluation of its effectiveness was explored and practiced in the form of reporting seminar on literature reading. The practical results show that the rubric approach can provide more comprehensive feedback on the effectiveness of students’ reporting seminar, which can not only provide formative evaluation results for students, but also help them to recognize and improve their deficiencies, and provide teaching feedback for teachers timely.
文章引用：王家宝, 徐伟光, 潘志松, 苗壮. 汇报研讨式课堂教学的量表评价方法[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(4): 543-549. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.134280

参考文献

[1] Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. (2012) Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education, 120-190.
[2] Gong, J., Cai, S. and Cheng, M. (2023) Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1129-1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Stufflebeam, D.L. (2003) The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In: Kellaghan, T. and Stufflebeam, D.L., Eds., International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, Springer, 31-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 国务院学位委员会 教育部. 专业学位研究生教育发展方案(2020-2025) [EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/202009/t20200930_492590.html, 2020-09-25.
[5] (美)史蒂文斯, (美)利维. 评价量表: 快速有效的教学评价工具[M]. 陈定刚, 译. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2014.
[6] Scriven, M. (1967) The Methodology of Evaluation. In: Tyler, R., Gagné, R. and Scriven, M., Eds., Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 1), Rand McNally, 39-83.
[7] Bafaraj, S.M. and Elkhadir, A.M. (2021) Evaluation of Diagnostic Radiography Technology Curriculum from the Graduates Perspective. Creative Education, 12, 265-277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 李楣. 研究生数据素养评价量表构建及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2018.
[9] 吴卫平, 樊葳葳, 彭仁忠. 中国大学生跨文化能力维度及评价量表分析[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2013, 45(4): 581-592+641.
[10] 杨志明, 刘巧民, 黄芬, 等. 英语课堂教学过程评价量表的研发及应用[J]. 教育测量与评价, 2020(11): 29-34.
[11] 赵荣, 于文舟, 王瑛. 护理硕士专业学位研究生教育过程质量评价量表的编制[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(15): 2655-2659.
[12] 刘晨韵. 高校美术专业实践类课程教学评价量表的设计与运用[J]. 美术教育研究, 2021(15): 98-101.
[13] 李婷婷. “立德树人”视域下大学公共体育课程思政教学效果评价量表研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2023.
[14] 苗成龙, 周君华, 季树宇, 等. 体育硕士专业学位论文质量评价量表的构建及测评[J]. 安徽体育科技, 2021, 42(3): 18-23+43.
[15] 高巍, 徐仕晔. 高校教师促进学生主动学习的评价量表研究——以PORTAAL为例[J]. 教学研究, 2019, 42(5): 16-25.
[16] 徐立清, 胡浩亮, 芦群. 应用型高校课程学习体验评价量表构建研究[J]. 浙江万里学院学报, 2023, 36(6): 88-94.
[17] 李绍珠, 吕浩雪. 教学评价有效性的研究——关于评价量表的内容效度[J]. 江苏高教, 1998(1): 53-55.

为你推荐