英文版I/D认知好奇心量表的汉化及信效度检验
Translation and Validation of the English Version of the I/D Epistemic Curiosity Scale
摘要: 该研究对Litman (2008)开发的I/D认知好奇心量表(I/D Epistemic Curiosity Scale, I/D ECS)进行汉化，并在中国大学生群体中验证其信效度。认知好奇心分为兴趣型(I型)和剥夺型(D型)，分别反映个体对知识探索的愉悦感和对知识缺口的填补需求。研究通过翻译、回译和验证性因子分析(CFA)等方法，检验中文版量表的心理测量学特性。结果显示，量表具有良好的结构效度和信度(Cronbach’s α > 0.80)，且与成就目标定向、感觉寻求及开放性人格显著相关。研究为认知好奇心的跨文化研究提供了新视角，并为中国教育心理学领域提供了可靠的测量工具。
Abstract: This study aimed to adapt the I/D Epistemic Curiosity Scale (I/D ECS) developed by Litman (2008) into Chinese and validate its reliability and validity among Chinese university students. Epistemic Curiosity, divided into Interest-type (I-type) and Deprivation-type (D-type), reflects individuals’ pleasure in exploring knowledge and their need to fill knowledge gaps, respectively. Through translation, back-translation, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the scale were examined. The results indicated that the scale demonstrated good structural validity and reliability (Cronbach’s α > 0.80) and was significantly correlated with achievement goal orientation, sensation seeking, and openness to experience. This study provides new insights for cross-cultural research on Epistemic Curiosity and offers a reliable measurement tool for the field of educational psychology in China.
文章引用：覃岭, 张华. 英文版I/D认知好奇心量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(4): 689-694. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.144339

参考文献

[1] Kashdan, T.B., Rose, P. and Fincham, F.D. (2004) Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291-305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Berlyne, D.E. (1954) A Theory of Human Curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 45, 180-191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Litman, J.A. and Spielberger, C.D. (2003) Measuring Epistemic Curiosity and Its Diversive and Specific Components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 75-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Kidd, C. and Hayden, B.Y. (2015) The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity. Neuron, 88, 449-460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Litman, J.A. (2008) Interest and Deprivation Factors of Epistemic Curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1585-1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994) Psychometric Theory. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill.
[7] 蒋京川. 成就目标定向与学业成绩的关系研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(3): 41-46.
[8] Elliot, A.J. and Church, M.A. (1997) A Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Chen, X., Li, F., Nydegger, L., Gong, J., Ren, Y., Dinaj-Koci, V., et al. (2013) Brief Sensation Seeking Scale for Chinese-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 604-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Hoyle, R.H., Stephenson, M.T., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E.P. and Donohew, R.L. (2002) Reliability and Validity of a Brief Measure of Sensation Seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 401-414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥, 等. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅰ: 理论框架与信效度分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(5): 545-548.
[12] 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅱ: 效度分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(6): 687-690.
[13] 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ: 简式版的制定及信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(4): 454-457.
[14] Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. (1992) NEO-PI-R. Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
[15] Kline, R.B. (2015) Principles and Practice of Structural equation Modeling. 4th Edition, Guilford Press.
[16] Brown, T.A. (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd Edition, Guilford Press.
[17] Litman, J.A. and Jimerson, T.L. (2004) The Measurement of Curiosity as a Feeling of Deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 147-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐