基于两类服务台分组休假的P2P网络性能分析
Performance Analysis of P2P Networks with Grouped Servers under Two-Type Vacation Policy
DOI: 10.12677/csa.2025.154115, PDF,   
作者: 史莉萌：燕山大学理学院，河北 秦皇岛
关键词: P2P网络；排队模型；矩阵几何解；能耗；P2P Network； Queue Model； Energy Efficiency； Matrix-Geometric Solutions
摘要: 针对P2P网络中大量节点在线带来的能耗问题，引入休假策略，规定在一定条件下部分服务节点将会离线，这种离线行为视为休假状态。数学模型的建立基于经典M/M/c排队，创建具有两类服务台和两类顾客的排队模型。本文将采用矩阵几何解法求解排队模型的稳态分布，从而进一步得到混合P2P网络的性能指标，来考察该网络的能耗表现。
Abstract: This paper proposes an energy consumption control strategy in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks. It is stipulated that some service peers will be offline under certain conditions, and this offline behavior is regarded as a vacation state. The hybrid P2P network can be modeled as an M/M/c queue, which serves two types of servers and two types of customers. The stationary distribution of the queue model can be obtained by matrix-geometric solution method. Thereby the energy consumption performance of hybrid P2P networks can be studied through performance indicators.
文章引用：史莉萌. 基于两类服务台分组休假的P2P网络性能分析[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2025, 15(4): 432-442. https://doi.org/10.12677/csa.2025.154115

参考文献

[1] 周文莉, 吴晓非. P2P技术综述[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2006, 27(1): 76-79.
[2] Obele, B.O., Ukaegbu, A.I. and Kang, M. (2009) On Tackling Free-Riders in P2P Networks. 2009 11th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, Gangwon, 15-18 February 2009, 2084-2089.
[3] Sharifi, L., Rameshan, N., Freitag, F. and Veiga, L. (2014) Energy Efficiency Dilemma: P2P-Cloud vs. Datacenter. 2014 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Singapore, 15-18 December 2014, 611-619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Cheklat, L., Amad, M. and Boukerram, A. (2017) A Limited Energy Consumption Model for P2P Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 96, 6299-6324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Ramachandran, K.K. and Sikdar, B. (2010) A Queuing Model for Evaluating the Transfer Latency of Peer-to-Peer Systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 21, 367-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Zhang, X. and Yin, B. (2017) Performance Analysis of CDN-P2P Networks Based on Processer-Sharing Queues. 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, 24-26 November 2017, 24-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 金顺福, 李洋, 刘建平, 等. P2P节点在线机制的纳什均衡和社会最优策略 [J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2016, 46(1): 296-302.
[8] Brienza, S., Cebeci, S.E., Masoumzadeh, S.S., Hlavacs, H., Özkasap, Ö. and Anastasi, G. (2015) A Survey on Energy Efficiency in P2P Systems: File Distribution, Content Streaming, and Epidemics. ACM Computing Surveys, 48, 1-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Zhang, G., Tang, M., Cheng, S., Zhang, G., Song, H., Cao, J., et al. (2011) P2P Traffic Optimization. Science China Information Sciences, 55, 1475-1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Karakaya, M., Korpeoglu, I. and Ulusoy, Ö. (2009) Free Riding in Peer-to-Peer Networks. IEEE Internet Computing, 13, 92-98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Ghaffari Sheshjavani, A., Akbari, B. and Ghaeini, H.R. (2016) A Free-Riding Resiliency Incentive Mechanism for VoD Streaming over Hybrid CDN-P2P Networks. 2016 8th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST), Tehran, 27-28 September 2016, 771-776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Zghaibeh, M. (2017) O-Torrent: A Fair, Robust, and Free Riding Resistant P2P Content Distribution Mechanism. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 11, 579-591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] 田乃硕, 岳德权. 拟生灭过程与矩阵几何解[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.