基金投资风险的实证研究——基于GARCH_VaR模型
An Empirical Study on Fund Investment Risk—Based on GARCH_VaR Model
摘要: 随着金融市场的迅速发展,基金行业市场规模不断增长,截至2024年底,公募基金管理总规模已突破32万亿元。准确有效测量基金的投资风险,对于基金市场的稳健发展以及基金投资者进行合理的资产配置具有重要作用。本文选取了安信价值精选股票(000577.OF)、华夏中证500ETF联接A (001052.OF)、国泰安康定期支付混合A (000367.OF)等不同投资类型和规模的9支样本基金自2017年11月至2022年2月的单位净值数据,利用VaR值来衡量基金风险。根据基金收益率序列“尖峰后尾”、“波动聚集”的特性,建立了GARCH_VaR模型,在正态分布和可以调整尾部参数的t分布、GED分布三种假设条件下,分别计算出各只基金的日VaR值,并应用Kupiec失败率检法对计算出的VaR值的进行检验,据此对不同分布假设条件下的模型进行评价,结果显示不同类型的基金风险差异较大,GED分布假设条件下的模型VaR估计更为准确,更能准确反映基金风险。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the financial market, the market size of the fund industry continues to grow. As of the end of 2024, the total managed size of public funds has exceeded 32 trillion yuan. Accurately and effectively measuring the investment risk of funds plays an important role in the stable development of the fund market and the rational asset allocation of fund investors. This article selects the unit net asset value data of 9 sample funds with different investment types and scales, including Anxin Value Selected Stock (000577.OF), Huaxia CSI 500 ETF Connect A (001052.OF), and Guotai Ankang Regular Payment Hybrid A (000367.OF), from November 2017 to February 2022, and uses VaR value to measure fund risk. Based on the characteristics of “peak after tail” and “volatility aggregation” in fund return sequences, a GARCH_VaR model was established. Under three assumptions: normal distribution, t-distribution with adjustable tail parameters, and GED distribution, the daily VaR values of each fund were calculated, and the Kupec failure rate test was applied to test the calculated VaR values. Based on this, the models under different distribution assumptions were evaluated. The results showed that there were significant differences in risk among different types of funds, and the VaR estimation of the model under the GED distribution assumption was more accurate and could better reflect fund risk.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Morgan, P.J. (1995) Risk Metrics Technology Document. 3rd Edition, Morgan Trust Compay Global Rsesearch.
|
|
[2]
|
Jorion, P. (1996) Risk2: Measuring the Risk in Value at Risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 52, 47-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Kupiec, P.H. (1995) Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3, 73-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
郑文通. 金融风险管理的VaR方法及其应用[J]. 国际金融研究, 1997(9): 58-62.
|
|
[5]
|
刘兴权, 王振山, 史永东. 金融风险管理中的VaR模型及其应用[J]. 东北财经大学学报, 1999(6): 49-51.
|
|
[6]
|
范英. VaR方法及其在股市风险分析中的应用初探[J]. 中国管理科学, 2000(3): 27-33.
|
|
[7]
|
Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987-1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
陈守东, 俞世典. 基于GARCH模型的VaR方法对中国股市的分析[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2002, 42(4): 11-17.
|
|
[10]
|
吴慧慧. 基于GARCH模型VAR方法外汇风险度量[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2013.
|
|
[11]
|
翟普珠. 开放式基金风险的度量分析与影响因素的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2013.
|
|
[12]
|
王扬. 我国货币市场基金风险估计及其风险管理分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2015.
|
|
[13]
|
王亚军, 李星野. 开放式LOF基金风险度量的实证研究——基于GARCH-VaR模型的方法[J]. 改革与开放, 2015(9): 22-24.
|
|
[14]
|
田原珺. 基于GARCH族模型的中国股票市场风险测度的实证分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2016.
|
|
[15]
|
宋沁鸽, 李阳. 我国开放式基金风险度量研究——基于GARCH-VaR模型[J]. 统计与管理, 2021, 36(4): 52-57.
|