阳明后学:欧阳德“动静合一”思想研究
Later Yangming School Followers: Study on Ouyang De’s Thought of “Unity of Dynamic and Static”
摘要: 欧阳德在动静问题中所讨论的并不是物质的时空变化,而是聚焦于良知之动静,并赋予其价值论意义。因此,对于欧阳德动静思想的研究来说,不论其关于良知的界定,则难以言其动静观的内涵。欧阳德也正是在此基础上展开了其本体与工夫层面之动静的思想论述。在欧阳德看来,良知本体是不分动静的,动静只不过是良知发生作用的不同状态,也即是在良知工夫之中才可言良知之动静:静时循良知即中,动时循良知即和,工夫即是在中和,动静合一,二者通一无二。
Abstract: What Ouyang De discusses in the problem of the dynamic and static is not the temporal and spatial change of matter, but focuses on the dynamic and static of conscience and endows it with axiological significance. Therefore, for the study of Ouyang De’s thought of dynamic and static, regardless of its definition of conscience, it is difficult to say the connotation of his dynamic and static view. It is on this basis that Ouyang De launched his ideological discussion on the dynamic and static of conscience substance and the dynamic and static of conscience function. In Ouyang De’s view, the conscience itself is not divided into the dynamic and static, the dynamic and static are just different states in which conscience acts, that is, the dynamic and static of conscience can only be spoken of in the function of conscience: static of conscience function is “Zhong”, dynamic of conscience function is “He”, therefore, conscience function is “Zhong” and “He”, unity of dynamic and static, not divided into two.
文章引用:吴宇婷. 阳明后学:欧阳德“动静合一”思想研究[J]. 哲学进展, 2025, 14(4): 543-549. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2025.144201

参考文献

[1] 黄宗羲. 明儒学案[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2008.
[2] 周敦颐. 周子通书[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2000.
[3] 朱熹. 朱熹集[M]. 成都: 四川教育出版社, 1996。
[4] 王阳明. 传习录. [M]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2003.
[5] 龚晓康, 史英达. “太极元无极”: 阳明心学视域下的太极无极之辨[J]. 周易研究, 2022(5): 55-62.
[6] 张学智. 论江右王门欧阳德的动静体用合一说[J]. 中州学刊, 1993(4): 71-75.
[7] 欧阳德. 欧阳德集[M]. 南京: 凤凰出版社, 2007.