基于MRI特征的附件肿物良恶性评分系统研究进展
Advances in MRI-Based Scoring Systems for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1551362, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 冉 鑫*, 朱略文, 徐子萌, 陈嘉懿：重庆医科大学附属第一医院妇产科，重庆；重庆医科大学第一临床学院，重庆；邓幼林#：重庆医科大学附属第一医院妇产科，重庆
关键词: 附件肿物；卵巢–附件影像报告与数据系统；ADNEXA MR评分系统；诊断效能；磁共振成像；Adnexal Mass； O-RADS MRI； ADNEX MR SCORING System； Diagnostic Efficiency； Magnetic Resonance Imaging
摘要: 本研究对基于MRI的附件肿物评分系统研究进展进行综述。首先分别回顾ADNEX MR评分系统和O-RADS MRI评分系统的提出背景及其对超声下不确定的附件肿物的诊断性能和临床价值。其次，整理两大MRI评分系统的分类标准以及相关的MRI特征术语。再总结近年来两大评分系统的临床应用进展及局限性。最后，进一步讨论MRI评分系统未来的可能发展方向。本综述旨在为后续研究附件肿物的术前评估及准确分类方面提供一些可行的思路和建议。
Abstract: The present review examines the current landscape and emerging developments of MRI-derived scoring systems for characterizing adnexal masses. Firstly, the background of the ADNEX MR SCORING system and the O-RADS MRI scoring system were reviewed, and their diagnostic performance and clinical value for indeterminate adnexal masses under ultrasound were reviewed, respectively. Secondly, the classification criteria of the two MRI scoring systems and the related descriptive terms of MRI signs are organized. The clinical progress and limitations of the two scoring systems in recent years are then summarized, and finally, the possible future directions of MRI scoring systems are further explored and discussed. The aim of this study is to provide some feasible ideas and suggestions for subsequent studies on the preoperative evaluation and accurate classification of adnexal masses.
文章引用：冉鑫, 朱略文, 徐子萌, 陈嘉懿, 邓幼林. 基于MRI特征的附件肿物良恶性评分系统研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(5): 221-233. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1551362

参考文献

[1] Cabedo, L., Sebastià, C., Munmany, M., Fusté, P., Gaba, L., Saco, A., et al. (2024) O-RADS MRI Scoring System: Key Points for Correct Application in Inexperienced Hands. Insights into Imaging, 15, Article No. 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Brun, J., Fritel, X., Aubard, Y., Borghese, B., Bourdel, N., Chabbert-Buffet, N., et al. (2014) Management of Presumed Benign Ovarian Tumors: Updated French Guidelines. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 183, 52-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Menon, U., Gentry-Maharaj, A., Burnell, M., Singh, N., Ryan, A., Karpinskyj, C., et al. (2021) Ovarian Cancer Population Screening and Mortality after Long-Term Follow-Up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): A Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet, 397, 2182-2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Menon, U., Gentry-Maharaj, A., Burnell, M., Singh, N., Ryan, A., Karpinskyj, C., et al. (2021) Ovarian Cancer Population Screening and Mortality after Long-Term Follow-Up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): A Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet, 397, 2182-2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Nikolic, O., Basta Nikolic, M., Spasic, A., Otero-Garcia, M.M. and Stojanovic, S. (2019) Systematic Radiological Approach to Utero-Ovarian Pathologies. The British Journal of Radiology, 92, Article ID: 20180439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Amor, F., Vaccaro, H., Alcázar, J.L., León, M., Craig, J.M. and Martinez, J. (2009) Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System: A New Proposal for Classifying Adnexal Masses on the Basis of Sonographic Findings. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 28, 285-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Andreotti, R.F., Timmerman, D., Strachowski, L.M., Froyman, W., Benacerraf, B.R., Bennett, G.L., et al. (2020) O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Radiology, 294, 168-185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Van Calster, B., Timmerman, D., Valentin, L., McIndoe, A., Ghaem‐Maghami, S., Testa, A., et al. (2012) Triaging Women with Ovarian Masses for Surgery: Observational Diagnostic Study to Compare RCOG Guidelines with an International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) Group Protocol. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 119, 662-671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Meys, E.M.J., Kaijser, J., Kruitwagen, R.F.P.M., Slangen, B.F.M., Van Calster, B., Aertgeerts, B., et al. (2016) Subjective Assessment versus Ultrasound Models to Diagnose Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Cancer, 58, 17-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Froyman, W., Landolfo, C., De Cock, B., Wynants, L., Sladkevicius, P., Testa, A.C., et al. (2019) Risk of Complications in Patients with Conservatively Managed Ovarian Tumours (IOTA5): A 2-Year Interim Analysis of a Multicentre, Prospective, Cohort Study. The Lancet Oncology, 20, 448-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Spencer, J.A. and Ghattamaneni, S. (2010) MR Imaging of the Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Mass. Radiology, 256, 677-694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Michielsen, K., Vergote, I., Op de beeck, K., Amant, F., Leunen, K., Moerman, P., et al. (2013) Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Sequence for Staging of Patients with Suspected Ovarian Cancer: A Clinical Feasibility Study in Comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT. European Radiology, 24, 889-901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Heilbrun, M.E., Olpin, J. and Shaaban, A. (2009) Imaging of Benign Adnexal Masses: Characteristic Presentations on Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 52, 21-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Sadowski, E.A., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Rockall, A., Maturen, K.E., Forstner, R., Jha, P., et al. (2022) O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee. Radiology, 303, 35-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Yamashita, Y., Torashima, M., Hatanaka, Y., Harada, M., Higashida, Y., Takahashi, M., et al. (1995) Adnexal Masses: Accuracy of Characterization with Transvaginal US and Precontrast and Postcontrast MR Imaging. Radiology, 194, 557-565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Kinkel, K., Lu, Y., Mehdizade, A., Pelte, M. and Hricak, H. (2005) Indeterminate Ovarian Mass at US: Incremental Value of Second Imaging Test for Characterization—Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Analysis. Radiology, 236, 85-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Forstner, R., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Cunha, T.M., Kinkel, K., Masselli, G., Kubik-Huch, R., et al. (2016) ESUR Recommendations for MR Imaging of the Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Mass: An Update. European Radiology, 27, 2248-2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Bernardin, L., Dilks, P., Liyanage, S., Miquel, M.E., Sahdev, A. and Rockall, A. (2011) Effectiveness of Semi-Quantitative Multiphase Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI as a Predictor of Malignancy in Complex Adnexal Masses: Radiological and Pathological Correlation. European Radiology, 22, 880-890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Dilks, P., Narayanan, P., Reznek, R., Sahdev, A. and Rockall, A. (2010) Can Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Independently Characterize an Ovarian Mass? European Radiology, 20, 2176-2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Thomassin-Naggara, I., Daraï, E., Cuenod, C.A., Fournier, L., Toussaint, I., Marsault, C., et al. (2009) Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Predicting Benignity of Complex Adnexal Masses. European Radiology, 19, 1544-1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Spencer, J.A., Forstner, R., Cunha, T.M. and Kinkel, K. (2009) ESUR Guidelines for MR Imaging of the Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Mass: An Algorithmic Approach. European Radiology, 20, 25-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Thomassin-Naggara, I., Aubert, E., Rockall, A., Jalaguier-Coudray, A., Rouzier, R., Daraï, E., et al. (2013) Adnexal Masses: Development and Preliminary Validation of an MR Imaging Scoring System. Radiology, 267, 432-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Ruiz, M., Labauge, P., Louboutin, A., Limot, O., Fauconnier, A. and Huchon, C. (2016) External Validation of the MR Imaging Scoring System for the Management of Adnexal Masses. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 205, 115-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Sasaguri, K., Yamaguchi, K., Nakazono, T., Mizuguchi, M., Aishima, S., Yokoyama, M., et al. (2019) External Validation of ADNEX MR SCORING System: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study. Clinical Radiology, 74, 131-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Hottat, N.A., Van Pachterbeke, C., Vanden Houte, K., Denolin, V., Jani, J.C. and Cannie, M.M. (2021) Magnetic Resonance Scoring System for Assessment of Adnexal Masses: Added Value of Diffusion‐weighted Imaging Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 57, 478-487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Troiano, R.N. and McCarthy, S. (1994) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Adnexal Masses. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, 15, 38-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Vázquez-Manjarrez, S.E., Rico-Rodriguez, O.C., Guzman-Martinez, N., Espinoza-Cruz, V. and Lara-Nuñez, D. (2020) Imaging and Diagnostic Approach of the Adnexal Mass: What the Oncologist Should Know. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 9, 69-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Sadowski, E.A., Robbins, J.B., Rockall, A.G. and Thomassin-Naggara, I. (2017) A Systematic Approach to Adnexal Masses Discovered on Ultrasound: The ADNEX MR Scoring System. Abdominal Radiology, 43, 679-695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Timmerman, D., Valentin, L., Bourne, T.H., Collins, W.P., Verrelst, H. and Vergote, I. (2000) Terms, Definitions and Measurements to Describe the Sonographic Features of Adnexal Tumors: A Consensus Opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 16, 500-505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Hricak, H., Chen, M., Coakley, F.V., Kinkel, K., Yu, K.K., Sica, G., et al. (2000) Complex Adnexal Masses: Detection and Characterization with MR Imaging—Multivariate Analysis. Radiology, 214, 39-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Siegelman, E.S. and Outwater, E.K. (1999) Tissue Characterization in the Female Pelvis by Means of MR Imaging. Radiology, 212, 5-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Thomassin-Naggara, I., Toussaint, I., Perrot, N., Rouzier, R., Cuenod, C.A., Bazot, M., et al. (2011) Characterization of Complex Adnexal Masses: Value of Adding Perfusion-and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging to Conventional MR Imaging. Radiology, 258, 793-803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Basha, M.A.A., Abdelrahman, H.M., Metwally, M.I., Alayouty, N.A., Mohey, N., Zaitoun, M.M.A., et al. (2020) Validity and Reproducibility of the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 53, 292-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Pereira, P.N., Sarian, L.O., Yoshida, A., Araújo, K.G., Barros, R.H.O., Baião, A.C., et al. (2018) Accuracy of the ADNEX MR Scoring System Based on a Simplified MRI Protocol for the Assessment of Adnexal Masses. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 24, 63-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Pereira, P.N., Sarian, L.O., Yoshida, A., Araújo, K.G., Silva, A.C.B., de Oliveira Barros, R.H., et al. (2019) Improving the Performance of IOTA Simple Rules: Sonographic Assessment of Adnexal Masses with Resource-Effective Use of a Magnetic Resonance Scoring (ADNEX MR Scoring System). Abdominal Radiology, 45, 3218-3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Thomassin-Naggara, I., Poncelet, E., Jalaguier-Coudray, A., Guerra, A., Fournier, L.S., Stojanovic, S., et al. (2020) Ovarian-adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses. JAMA Network Open, 3, e1919896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] 李桂军, 文鹏, 黄丽霞, 向恋. ADNEX MR评分系统在超声不确定附件肿块诊断中的应用价值[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2022, 36(11): 879-883.
[38] Reinhold, C., Rockall, A., Sadowski, E.A., Siegelman, E.S., Maturen, K.E., Vargas, H.A., et al. (2021) Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for MRI: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MRI Committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 18, 713-729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Nougaret, S., Razakamanantsoa, L., Sadowski, E.A., Stein, E.B., Lakhman, Y., Hindman, N.M., et al. (2024) O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Pearls and Pitfalls. Insights into Imaging, 15, Article No. 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Sahin, H., Panico, C., Ursprung, S., Simeon, V., Chiodini, P., Frary, A., et al. (2021) Non-Contrast MRI Can Accurately Characterize Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study. European Radiology, 31, 6962-6973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Assouline, V., Dabi, Y., Jalaguier-Coudray, A., Stojanovic, S., Millet, I., Reinhold, C., et al. (2022) How to Improve O-RADS MRI Score for Rating Adnexal Masses with Cystic Component? European Radiology, 32, 5943-5953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Wengert, G.J., Dabi, Y., Kermarrec, E., Jalaguier-Coudray, A., Poncelet, E., Porcher, R., et al. (2022) O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better than Visual Assessment. Radiology, 303, E28-E28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Nougaret, S., Lakhman, Y., Bahadir, S., Sadowski, E., Thomassin-Naggara, I. and Reinhold, C. (2022) Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI): Genesis and Future Directions. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 74, 370-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Aslan, S. and Tosun, S.A. (2021) Diagnostic Accuracy and Validity of the O-RADS MRI Score Based on a Simplified MRI Protocol: A Single Tertiary Center Retrospective Study. Acta Radiologica, 64, 377-386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Ishimatsu, K., Nishie, A., Takayama, Y., Asayama, Y., Ushijima, Y., Kakihara, D., et al. (2019) Amide Proton Transfer Imaging for Differentiating Benign Ovarian Cystic Lesions: Potential of First Time Right. European Journal of Radiology, 120, Article ID: 108656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐