心肌梗死患者急救护理中的多学科协作模式探讨
Study on Multidisciplinary Cooperative Mode in Emergency Nursing of Patients with Myocardial Infarction
摘要: 目的:探讨心肌梗死患者急救护理中的多学科协作模式对患者临床疗效、焦虑与抑郁情绪改善、心绞痛缓解时间以及住院时间的影响。方法:2023年2月至2024年9月,采用简单随机抽样法选择90名心肌梗死患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组45例。观察组患者接受基于多学科协作模式的急救护理干预,对照组患者则接受常规急救护理。通过对比两组患者的心绞痛缓解时间、焦虑与抑郁评分(使用SAS和SDS量表)、住院时间等指标,评估不同护理干预的效果。结果:观察组患者的心绞痛缓解时间显著短于对照组(P < 0.05),观察组患者干预后SAS与SDS评分显著低于对照组,焦虑与抑郁水平得到了显著改善(P < 0.01),观察组患者的住院时间显著短于对照组(P < 0.01)。结论:多学科协作模式的急救护理能够显著缩短心肌梗死患者的心绞痛缓解时间,改善焦虑与抑郁情绪,缩短住院时间,提高临床疗效,具有较好的临床应用前景。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effect of multidisciplinary cooperative mode in emergency nursing of patients with myocardial infarction on clinical efficacy, improvement of anxiety and depression, relief time of angina pectoris and length of hospital stay. Methods: From February 2023 to September 2024, 90 patients with myocardial infarction were selected by simple random sampling method and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 45 cases in each group. Patients in the observation group received emergency nursing intervention based on multidisciplinary cooperation mode, while patients in the control group received routine emergency nursing. The effects of different nursing interventions were evaluated by comparing angina relief time, anxiety and depression scores (using SAS and SDS scales), length of hospital stay and other indicators between the two groups. Results: The remission time of angina pectoris in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05), the SAS and SDS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group after intervention, the anxiety and depression levels were significantly improved (P < 0.01), and the hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Multidisciplinary cooperative emergency nursing can significantly shorten the relief time of angina pectoris in patients with myocardial infarction, improve anxiety and depression, shorten hospital stay, improve clinical efficacy, and have a good clinical application prospect.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
范丹丹, 邹丽芳, 林莺. 以专科护士为主导多学科团队协作的延续护理在急诊心肌梗死患者中的应用及效果评价[J]. 心血管病防治知识, 2024, 14(3): 62-64.
|
|
[2]
|
冯智灵. 渐进式抗阻训练结合多学科协作干预在急性心肌梗死患者中的应用效果[J]. 心血管病防治知识, 2023, 13(18): 93-96.
|
|
[3]
|
林雪娇, 林英. 多学科协作护理在急性心肌梗死患者中的应用效果[J]. 中外医学研究, 2023, 21(16): 107-112.
|
|
[4]
|
刘丽娇, 颜小星, 圣小卫. 多学科协作康复运动模式对心肌梗死PCI术后患者功能性体适能及血液流变学的影响[J]. 微创医学, 2023, 18(2): 208-212.
|
|
[5]
|
田竟, 任莹, 张杨, 等. 急救通道优化联合多学科协作干预在急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者救护中的应用效果[J]. 河南医学研究, 2022, 31(20): 3733-3736.
|
|
[6]
|
储晨, 林怡翔, 何岚, 等. 不典型川崎病致巨大冠状动脉瘤发生心肌梗死后多学科团队协作诊治一例[J]. 上海医学, 2022, 45(8): 549-554.
|
|
[7]
|
郭晓岚, 李粉娜, 王珍, 等. 基于ERAS理念构建AMI患者Ⅰ期心脏康复路径化管理模式[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2022, 29(3): 77-83.
|
|
[8]
|
李璐, 邹扬丹, 温志强. 多学科协作在基层医院救治STEMI患者中的应用效果研究[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2022, 26(8): 1-4.
|
|
[9]
|
于庆云, 孟四平. 多学科团队协作健康宣教在心肌梗死患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国民康医学, 2021, 33(4): 148-150.
|
|
[10]
|
马林. fayipian多学科团队协作健康教育在心肌梗死患者中的应用[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志, 2020, 52(12): 1489-1490.
|
|
[11]
|
丁雅明, 张敏. 多学科协作诊疗模式在ECPR成功救治院外心脏骤停患者中的应用附1例分析[J]. 吉林医学, 2020, 41(8): 2048-2049.
|
|
[12]
|
王海荣, 杨平, 周美, 等. 多学科团队合作对急性心梗伴有心衰溶栓治疗患者自我管理的影响[J]. 华夏医学, 2020, 33(3): 134-138.
|