ICU患者早期肺康复现状及影响因素的调查研究
Investigation on the Status Quo and Influencing Factors of Early Pulmonary Rehabilitation in ICU Patients
DOI: 10.12677/ns.2025.145093, PDF,   
作者: 胡春兰:广州医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科,广东 广州
关键词: ICU患者肺康复自我效能感PRAISE量表影响因素ICU Patients Pulmonary Rehabilitation Self-Efficacy PRAISE Scale Influencing Factors
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在调查ICU患者早期肺康复的实施现状及其影响因素,为优化ICU患者康复治疗方案提供科学依据。方法:采用横断面调查设计,收集75例入住ICU并接受治疗的患者的基本数据、肺康复干预情况及自我效能感(PRAISE量表评分)。通过单因素和多因素回归分析探讨影响肺康复效果的主要因素。结果:ICU患者的PRAISE得分为24.35 ± 5.21,表明患者整体自我效能感处于中等水平。分析发现,干预开始时间、年龄、住院时间、合并症、呼吸支持类型和干预频率与参与度对肺康复效果有显著影响。早期干预、较年轻年龄、较短住院时间、无合并症以及高频次、高参与度干预与较高的自我效能感相关。结论:ICU患者的早期肺康复干预能显著提高自我效能感,干预的早期开始、高参与度及较少的合并症等因素对康复效果具有重要影响。未来应进一步优化康复方案,特别是针对老年患者和有合并症患者,个性化治疗可能有助于提高康复效果。
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the implementation status and influencing factors of early pulmonary rehabilitation in ICU patients, and to provide scientific basis for optimizing the rehabilitation treatment of ICU patients. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect the basic data, pulmonary rehabilitation intervention and self-efficacy (PRAISE scale score) of 75 patients admitted and treated in ICU. The main factors influencing the pulmonary rehabilitation effect were investigated by univariate and multifactorial regression analysis. Results: The PRAISE score of ICU patients was 24.35 ± 5.21, indicating that patients’ overall self-efficacy was at a moderate level. The analysis found that intervention initiation time, age, length of hospital stay, comorbidities, type of respiratory support, and intervention frequency and involvement had significant effects on pulmonary rehabilitation. Early intervention, younger age, shorter length of hospital stay, absence of comorbidities, and high frequency and involvement of interventions were associated with higher self-efficacy. Conclusion: Early pulmonary rehabilitation intervention in ICU patients can significantly improve self-efficacy, and the early start of intervention, high participation and less comorbidities have important effects on the rehabilitation effect. In the future, the rehabilitation program should be further optimized, especially for elderly patients and patients with comorbidities, and personalized treatment may help to improve the rehabilitation effect.
文章引用:胡春兰. ICU患者早期肺康复现状及影响因素的调查研究[J]. 护理学, 2025, 14(5): 691-696. https://doi.org/10.12677/ns.2025.145093

参考文献

[1] 王敏, 邢健红, 姚胜男. 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期病人肺康复训练知信行现状及影响因素分析[J]. 全科护理, 2024, 22(22): 4349-4353.
[2] 叶世贤, 赵东兴, 苏冠升, 等. 呼吸康复对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效及影响预后的危险因素分析: 回顾性研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2024, 39(11): 1581-1587.
[3] 王建元, 刘健, 谢英. 深圳市尘肺病患者肺康复知信行现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2024, 42(5): 580-586.
[4] 魏嘉辛, 厚双龙, 黑鹏, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复疗效的影响因素: 基于新版CFIR框架的系统评价[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2024, 23(10): 703-709.
[5] 缪小浪, 钮美娥, 韩燕霞, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者呼吸困难恐惧影响因素及路径分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(18): 37-41+47.
[6] 胡树菁, 孙菁, 王奕, 等. 肺移植受者居家肺康复锻炼促进与障碍因素的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(17): 2070-2077.
[7] 张明月, 田玉梅, 高娥, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者居家肺康复维持现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(17): 2077-2083.
[8] 崔静, 韦静, 郝晓瑞. 基于5A护理模式的肺康复训练对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能及自我效能感的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2023, 8(20): 146-149.
[9] 贾明英, 吴婷婷, 许会娟, 等. 个性化身心诉求护理模式下的肺康复护理对老年慢阻肺患者症状改善及肺功能的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2024, 47(6): 185-186+189.
[10] 廖佳星, 龚放华, 唐三辉, 等. 中医肺康复疗法对老年COPD患者步态平衡及心理灵活性的影响[J]. 湖南中医杂志, 2024, 40(9): 85-89.
[11] 董傅燕, 彭霞, 朱金玲, 等. COPD病人肺康复计划依从性与其康复认知、态度的相关性[J]. 循证护理, 2024, 10(12): 2232-2237.
[12] 盛方. 误吸风险评估下分级肺康复护理对ICU机械通气患者干预效果[J]. 湖北科技学院学报(医学版), 2025, 39(1): 72-76.
[13] 瞿佳雯. 行为改变轮模式下肺康复护理对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复训练依从性的影响[J]. 中外医学研究, 2024, 22(31): 84-88.
[14] 方玉玲, 夏燕玲. 循证护理联合肺康复护理模式对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者运动耐力、生活质量的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2024, 37(6): 1481-1485.
[15] 韩雨, 毕传昊, 郑志达, 等. 早期肺康复训练联合全身振动训练对AECOPD患者肺功能、运动能力和动脉血气分析指标的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2024, 24(24): 4704-4706