网络游戏直播画面的邻接权保护问题研究
Study on the Protection of Neighboring Rights of Live Online Game Screens
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.115166, PDF,   
作者: 李文荣:上海大学科研管理部技术转移中心,上海;段海洋:上海大学知识产权学院,上海
关键词: 网络游戏直播画面邻接权权利理论Live Online Game Screens Neighboring Rights Theory of Legal Rights
摘要: 网络游戏直播画面的著作权定性是规范网络直播行业发展的重要问题。根据法律权利理论,考察网络游戏直播画面的本质具有理论与实践意义。首先,网络游戏直播画面具有达到作品独创性标准,且属于智力成果的可能,不能一概而论;其次,比较网络游戏直播行为与具有演绎性质的创作行为、具有表演性质的创作行为与侵权行为,网络游戏直播行为应属于具有表演性质的创作行为,若未经游戏权利人的许可,则构成侵权。最后,由于网络游戏直播画面的著作权定性问题尚未形成共识,相较于扩大解释广播组织权,单独立法成本较高,也不够灵活。因此,扩大解释现行广播组织权,如将网络传播及其他发挥传播作用的组织纳入规制范围,更符合我国立法现状及数字时代的发展特点。
Abstract: The copyright characterization of online game live screen is an important issue to regulate the development of network live broadcasting industry. According to the theory of legal rights, examining the nature of online game live screen has theoretical and practical significance. First of all, online game live screen has to meet the standard of originality of the work, and belongs to the possibility of intellectual achievements, can not be generalized; secondly, comparing the online game live act with the creative act of deductive nature, the creative act of performative nature and infringement, the online game live act should belong to the creative act of performative nature, without the permission of the game right holder, it constitutes infringement. Finally, as the issue of copyright characterization of online game live broadcasting screen has not yet formed a consensus, compared with the expansion of the interpretation of the right to broadcasting organization, separate legislation is more costly and less flexible. Therefore, expanding the interpretation of the existing broadcasting organization right, such as including network communication and other organizations playing the role of communication into the scope of regulation, is more in line with the current state of China’s legislation and the development characteristics of the digital era.
文章引用:李文荣, 段海洋. 网络游戏直播画面的邻接权保护问题研究[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(5): 45-52. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.115166

参考文献

[1] 王迁. 电子游戏直播的著作权问题研究[J]. 电子知识产权, 2016(2): 11-18.
[2] Burk, D.L. (2013) Owning E-Sports: Proprietary Rights in Professional Computer Gaming. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1737-1577.
[3] 许辉猛. 玩家游戏直播著作权侵权责任认定及保护途径[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2017, 32(4): 22-32.
[4] Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 579 (1994).
[5] 上海市浦东新区人民法院. 浦民三(知)初字第191号[Z]. 2015.
[6] [美]罗斯科·庞德. 普通法的精神[M]. 唐前宏, 廖湘文, 高雪原, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2022.
[7] 最高人民法院. 民申字第1262号民事裁定书[Z]. 2013.
[8] 王迁, 袁锋. 论网络游戏整体画面的作品定性[J]. 中国版权, 2016(4): 19-24.
[9] 梁志文. 论演绎权的保护范围[J]. 中国法学, 2015(5): 140-157.
[10] 李永明. 论表演者权利的法律保护[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2002, 32(4): 46-52.
[11] 熊文聪. 论著作权法中的“表演”与“表演者”[J]. 法商研究, 2016, 33(6): 180-187.
[12] 崔国斌. 认真对待游戏著作权[J]. 知识产权, 2016(2): 3-18.
[13] 谢琳. 网络游戏直播的著作权合理使用研究[J]. 知识产权, 2017(1): 32-40+45.
[14] American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, 60 F3d 913 c.
[15] [英]洛克. 政府论(下) [M]. 瞿菊农, 叶启芳, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009.
[16] [美]贾斯汀·休斯. 知识产权法哲学[M]//刘春田. 中国知识产权评论(第二卷). 北京: 商务印书馆, 2006: 25.
[17] 吴建斌. 科斯理论中的界权成本及其现实意义[J]. 南大法学, 2020(2): 36-56.
[18] 王素玉. 版权法的经济分析[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2016: 102.
[19] Ricketson, S. and Ginsburg, J. (2022) International Copyright and Neighboring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond. Oxford University Press.