青东煤矿太原组灰岩水水文地球化学特征
Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Limestone Water in Taiyuan Formation of Qingdong Coal Mine
DOI: 10.12677/ojns.2025.133058, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘 旭, 许继影, 余 凯:宿州学院资源与土木工程学院,安徽 宿州;戴洪宝:宿州学院环境与测绘工程学院,安徽 宿州;温廷中:安徽省煤田地质局第三勘探队,安徽 宿州
关键词: 灰岩水水化学青东煤矿水化学特征Karst Water Hydrogeochemistry Qingdong Coal Mine Hydrogeochemical Characteristics
摘要: 为了深入了解掌握淮北青东煤矿太原组灰岩水的水化学组成及其控制因素,本文收集了青东煤矿太原组灰岩水20个水样数据,采用统计分析,Piper三线图,Gibbs图,离子分析法,综合分析了研究区域的水化学特征及其水岩作用。结果表明,太原组水样水体中阳离子主要为钠离子和钙离子,阴离子主要为硫酸根离子和氯离子,水体为弱碱性淡咸水。Piper三线图表明,水化学类型主要为Ca·Na + K-SO4·Cl型。离子分析法和Gibbs图表明研究地区离子来源与岩盐溶解、硫酸盐岩溶解、碳酸盐岩溶解、硅酸盐岩风化等作用有关,蒸发浓缩作用对研究地区影响最为显著。研究结果对矿井合理开采等工作提供指导。
Abstract: In order to deeply understand and master the hydrochemical composition and its controlling factors of the limestone water in the Taiyuan Formation of Qingdong Coal Mine in Huaibei, this paper collected data from 20 water samples of the limestone water in the Taiyuan Formation of Qingdong Coal Mine. Through statistical analysis, Piper trilinear diagrams, Gibbs diagrams, and ion analysis methods, the hydrochemical characteristics and water-rock interactions in the study area were comprehensively analyzed. The results show that the main cations in the water samples of the Taiyuan Formation are sodium ions and calcium ions, and the main anions are sulfate ions and chloride ions. The water body is weakly alkaline brackish water. The Piper trilinear diagram indicates that the hydrochemical type is mainly Ca·Na + K-SO4·Cl type. The ion analysis method and Gibbs diagram show that the ion sources in the study area are related to processes, such as rock salt dissolution, sulfate rock dissolution, carbonate rock dissolution, and silicate rock weathering. The evaporation and concentration effect has the most significant impact on the study area. The research results provide guidance for the rational mining of the mine and other work.
文章引用:刘旭, 戴洪宝, 温廷中, 许继影, 余凯. 青东煤矿太原组灰岩水水文地球化学特征[J]. 自然科学, 2025, 13(3): 546-553. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojns.2025.133058

参考文献

[1] 汪名鹏. 江苏泗阳城区浅层地下水化学特征及其影响因素[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(6): 1329-1336.
[2] 武强, 赵苏启, 孙文洁, 等. 中国煤矿水文地质类型划分与特征分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(6): 901-905.
[3] Sun, L. (2017) Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Chemistry in Coal Mine and Its Hydrological Implications. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 20, 335-344.
[4] 张传奇, 王晓曦, 陈曦. 莱州湾东岸地下水化学特征及水质评价[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2020, 40(4): 56-61.
[5] 庞园, 曾慧, 张明珠, 等. 流溪河流域地下水三氮分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 人民珠江, 2021, 42(12): 17-23.
[6] 周巾枚, 蒋忠诚, 徐光黎, 等. 崇左响水地区地下水水质分析及健康风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(6): 2675-2685.
[7] 原升艳, 朱爱萍, 曾红平, 等. 广州市浅层地下水水化学特征及水质评价[J]. 人民珠江, 2022, 43(11): 51-59.
[8] 冯琪, 马雷, 罗江发, 等. 顾桥矿二叠系砂岩裂隙水化学特征及其形成作用[J]. 合肥工业大学报(自然科学版), 2022, 45(12): 1693-1698.
[9] 闵宁, 任瑾, 林曼利. 淮北平原区城市浅层地下水化学特征及成因分析——以宿州市为例[J]. 九江学院学报(自然科学版), 2018, 33(1): 14-17.
[10] 周宁生. 第二次“水和废水监测分析方法”协作组扩大会议在南京召开[J]. 中国环境监测, 1986(2): 65.
[11] 胡春华, 周文斌, 夏思奇. 鄱阳湖流域水化学主离子特征及其来源分析[J]. 环境化学, 2011, 30(9): 1620-1626.
[12] Gibbs, R.J. (1970) Mechanisms Controlling World Water Chemistry. Science, 170, 1088-1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 柳凤霞, 史紫薇, 钱会, 等. 银川地区地下水水化学特征演化规律及水质评价[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(9): 2055-2066.