不同pH条件下生石灰对电解锰渣中重金属释放的影响
Effect of Quicklime on Release of Heavy Metals from Electrolytic Manganese Residue in Different pH
DOI: 10.12677/ms.2025.155110, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 蒋玉雪, 董慧林*, 徐秀月, 任 军, 姜恒迪, 曾明珍:贵州师范学院地理与资源学院,贵州 贵阳;贵州省流域地理国情监测重点实验室,贵州 贵阳;王宁宁:自然资源部重庆典型矿区生态修复野外科学观测研究站(重庆地质矿产研究院),重庆
关键词: pH电解锰渣生石灰重金属pH Electrolytic Manganese Slag Quicklime Heavy Metal
摘要: 电解锰渣是电解锰生产过程中产生的一种工业固体废弃物,含有大量的重金属,存在严重的环境污染风险。本研究通过室内模拟方法探讨了不同pH (4、5、6、纯净水以及8)条件下生石灰添加量(1%、2%、3%、4%和5%)对电解锰渣中Mn、Cd、Cu、Zn、Pb和Tl等重金属释放行为的影响。结果表明,浸出液pH随浸提液pH的升高而升高,浸出液Eh随着生石灰添加比例的升高而降低,同时,生石灰添加比例的提高能显著抑制重金属的浸出,浸提液pH 4时,生石灰添加量从1%增至5%时,浸出液Mn浓度由126.65 mg/L降至4.44 mg/L,降幅达96.5%,而pH升至8时,5%添加组Mn浓度降低,同时,生石灰添加比例对Cu、Zn、Pb和Tl同样具有显著影响,pH 4浸提条件下,与1%添加组相比,5%添加组中Cu、Pb和Tl的下降幅度分别达到36.16%、86.09%、65.90%和47.84%,表明不同重金属对pH敏感度及其沉淀物稳定性存在显著差异。
Abstract: Electrolytic manganese residue is a kind of industrial solid waste produced in the process of electrolytic manganese production, which contains a lot of heavy metals and has serious environmental pollution risk. In this study, the effects of the amount of quick lime (1%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5%) on the release behavior of heavy metals such as Mn, Cd, Cu, Zn, Pb and Tl in electrolytic manganese slag at different pH values (4, 5, 6, pure water and 8) were investigated by indoor simulation. The results showed that the pH of the leaching solution increased with the increase of the pH of the leaching solution, and the Eh of the leaching solution decreased with the increase of the proportion of quicklime added. Meanwhile, the increase in the proportion of quicklime added could significantly inhibit the leaching of heavy metals. When the pH of the leaching solution was 4, the amount of quicklime added increased from 1% to 5%. The concentration of Mn in the leaching solution decreased from 126.65 mg/L to 4.44 mg/L, a decrease of 96.5%, and the concentration of Mn in the 5% addition group decreased when pH increased to 8. At the same time, the proportion of quicklime addition also had significant effects on Cu, Zn, Pb and Tl. Cu, Pb and Tl decreased by 36.16%, 86.09%, 65.90% and 47.84% in the 5% addition group, respectively, indicating that there were significant differences in the sensitivity of different heavy metals to pH and the stability of sediments.
文章引用:蒋玉雪, 董慧林, 徐秀月, 任军, 王宁宁, 姜恒迪, 曾明珍. 不同pH条件下生石灰对电解锰渣中重金属释放的影响[J]. 材料科学, 2025, 15(5): 1052-1057. https://doi.org/10.12677/ms.2025.155110

参考文献

[1] 罗姗姗, 罗洋, 蒲丽群, 等. 电解锰渣与磷石膏复配对芒草种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 能源与环保, 2024, 46(11): 115-121.
[2] 罗姗姗, 罗洋, 蒲丽群, 等. 优势植物对电解锰渣中Mn迁移的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2024, 30(19): 61-64.
[3] 吕扬涛. 锰成矿菌群对锰矿废弃地生态演替及锰渣无害化的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2023.
[4] 何德军, 舒建成, 陈梦君, 等. 电解锰渣建材资源化研究现状与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(10): 4227-4237.
[5] 梁宇廷, 孟棒棒, 林晔, 等. 多种固废协同处理电解锰渣固锰除氨的最优配比及效果分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2023, 17(7): 2342-2351.
[6] 张阳. 中国锰金属产业发展现状及投资风险分析[J]. 中国锰业, 2024, 42(5): 1-8.
[7] 吴霜, 王家伟, 刘利, 等. 电解锰渣综合利用评述[J]. 机盐工业, 2016, 48(4): 22-25.
[8] 罗飞, 匡飞, 邹序安, 等. 电解锰渣的研究现状[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2018(1): 227-228.
[9] 陆凤, 陈淼, 陈兰兰. 贵州松桃某电解锰企业锰渣重金属污染特征及对植物生长的毒性效应[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(5): 124-129.
[10] 母维宏, 和森, 周新涛, 等. 铜渣/电解锰渣基磷酸盐胶凝材料的制备及其形成机理探讨[J]. 化学工程, 2020, 48(10): 23-28.
[11] 杨瑞枝, 连海波, 李晓军, 等. 固化/稳定化重金属污染土力学及浸出特性试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(16): 6672-6677.
[12] 刘健宇, 沈君, 金艳云, 等. 基于化学沉淀法去除电解锰渣中锰和氨氮的实验[J]. 中国锰业, 2024, 42(5): 15-20.
[13] 孙晓, 庄舜尧, 桂仁意, 等. 集约经营下雷竹林土壤低分子量有机酸的初步研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(3): 599-603.
[14] 张德林, 喻文, 王梅, 等. 生石灰类处理对川芎5种重金属含量及产量和品质的影响研究[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2021, 33(11): 1925-1935.
[15] 刘军, 冯秀智, 史磊, 等. 生石灰用量对早竹林土壤酸碱度及有效态重金属含量的影响[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2017, 37(2): 55-59.
[16] 程毅, 黄剑明, 周柏明, 等. 生石灰在污泥重金属钝化中的应用[J]. 环境工程, 2012, 30(S2): 325-326.
[17] 殷皓, 娄伟, 周自力, 等. 电解锰渣的无害化处理实验[J]. 中国锰业, 2024, 42(4): 26-31+35.