浅谈几种常见烟气含湿量测试仪的性能特点及使用场景
Research on the Innovative Path of New Quality Productivity to Empower Traditional Measurement
摘要: 烟气含湿量是工业排放监测、燃烧效率优化及环保合规性评估的关键参数。不同工况下对烟气湿度的测量需求差异显著,阻容法、重量法和干湿球法作为主流测试方法,各有其技术特点及适用场景。本文结合文献与工业实践,系统分析三类方法的原理、性能特征及适用范围,为仪器选型提供科学依据。
Abstract: Flue gas moisture content is a key parameter for industrial emission monitoring, combustion efficiency optimization, and environmental compliance assessment. The measurement requirements for flue gas humidity under different working conditions are significantly different, and the resistance and capacitance method, gravimetric method and wet and dry bulb method are the mainstream test methods, each with its own technical characteristics and applicable scenarios. In this paper, the principles, performance characteristics and scope of application of the three types of methods are systematically analyzed by combining literature and industrial practice, so as to provide a scientific basis for instrument selection.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王永强, 宋春玲, 黄继鑫, 等. 基于化工行业烟气特性的脱硝技术优选策略研究[J]. 山西化工, 2025, 45(1): 240-242+249.
|
|
[2]
|
李军状. 燃煤电厂有色烟羽成因与控制关键技术研发及应用[Z]. 国能南京电力试验研究有限公司, 2018-12-01.
|
|
[3]
|
刘军, 杨志伟, 韩立民. HMP45D湿度测量误差调整及校准[J]. 吉林气象, 2008(1): 42-43.
|
|
[4]
|
邬昕, 乔家广, 庄炜杰. 预热对阻容法烟气含湿量测量仪测量结果的影响[J]. 上海计量测试, 2023, 50(2): 47-48+53.
|
|
[5]
|
黄成浩. 烟气湿度测试仪校准装置的研制[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2021, 48(4): 18-20.
|
|
[6]
|
苑继超, 顾冬梅. 干湿球法测高温烟气湿度的误差研究[J]. 河北冶金, 2019(z1): 44-46.
|
|
[7]
|
潘建明, 田云萍. 干湿球法测量空气与烟气含湿量计算公式的推导和改正[J]. 环境与开发, 1998(4): 48-49+51.
|