基于机器学习预测前列腺增生术后早期生化复发
Prediction of Early Biochemical Recurrence after Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery Based on Machine Learning
摘要: 前列腺增生的术后生化复发是困扰患者正常生活的难题之一,其中尿失禁是最突出的问题。传统的统计学方法和逻辑回归算法在对术后尿失禁的预测上具有很大的局限性,预测效果也不尽人意,大大影响了对患者术后的治疗和术前的诊断。对于以上的问题,文章构建了新的预测前列腺增生术后早期生化复发的模型,主要目的是更准确、更有效地预测患者术后早期生化复发,将该模型命名为“S-KFG”。在研究中,模型主要是以软投票分类器作为集成算法,将KNN、随机森林、梯度提升树组合形成。另外使用堆叠算法,以随机森林算法为基模型、逻辑回归算法为元模型做集成模型,命名为“Hancerforest”。并与一些传统的机器学习算法,如随机森林、梯度提升树等,以及传统的逻辑回归预测进行比较。基于大连医科大学附属第二医院泌尿外科的数据,S-KFG模型的结果显示:模型的AUC值达到了0.888,Hancerforest模型的AUC值也达到了0.872,与传统的逻辑回归预测模型相比,本研究的模型具有更好的预测效果。
Abstract: Postoperative biochemical recurrence of prostatic hyperplasia is one of the problems that plague the normal life of patients, among which urinary incontinence is the most prominent problem. Traditional statistical methods and logistic regression algorithms have great limitations in predicting postoperative urinary incontinence, and the prediction effect is unsatisfactory, which greatly affects the postoperative treatment and preoperative diagnosis of patients. In order to solve the above problems, a new model for predicting early biochemical recurrence after prostatic hyperplasia was constructed, and the main purpose was to predict early biochemical recurrence in patients with prostatic hyperplasia more accurately and effectively, named “S-KFG”. In this paper, the model mainly uses the soft vote classifier as the ensemble algorithm and combines KNN, random forest, and gradient-boosting trees to form a group. In addition, the stacking algorithm is used, the random forest algorithm is used as the base model, and the logistic regression algorithm is used as the metamodel to make the ensemble model, which is named “Hancerforest”. It is also compared with some traditional machine learning algorithms such as random forest, gradient boosted tree, etc., as well as traditional logistic regression prediction. Based on the data of the Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, the results of the S-KFG model showed that the AUC value of the model reached 0.888, and the AUC value of the Hancerforest model also reached 0.872, which was better than the traditional logistic regression prediction model.
文章引用:高晓阳. 基于机器学习预测前列腺增生术后早期生化复发[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(5): 612-622. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.145419

参考文献

[1] Sataa, S. (2017) Predictive Factors of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy: Systematic Review. La Tunisie Medicale, 95, 229-235.
[2] Ficarra, V. and Cavalleri, S. (2007) Editorial Comment On: Holmium Laser Enucleation versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. European Urology, 52, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 封志强, 郑玲, 林盛强, 等. 经尿道铥激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2024, 30(19): 153-155.
[4] Iacovelli, V., Carilli, M., Sandri, M., Forte, V., Cipriani, C., Bertolo, R., et al. (2022) The Role of Preoperative Prostatic Shape in the Recovery of Urinary Continence after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Cohort Analysis. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 26, 374-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Matsushita, K., Kent, M.T., Vickers, A.J., von Bodman, C., Bernstein, M., Touijer, K.A., et al. (2015) Preoperative Predictive Model of Recovery of Urinary Continence after Radical Prostatectomy. BJU International, 116, 577-583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Negrean, C., Alam, A., Hickling, D., Vigil, H.R., Lavallée, L.T., Mallick, R., et al. (2025) Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Membranous Urethral Length as a Predictor of Urinary Continence after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Urology Focus. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Pietro, C., Simone, F., Giulio, L., et al. (2023) Management of Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Challenges and Solutions. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 19, 43-56.
[8] Large, T., Borofsky, M.S. and Lingeman, J.E. (2016) Re: Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using the 180 Watt System: Multicenter Study of the Impact of Prostate Size on Safety and Outcomes and Re: Greenlight™ Laser (XPS) Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Urology, 195, 228-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Froehner, M. and Wirth, M.P. (2013) Re: Vincenzo Ficarra, Giacomo Novara, Raymond C. Rosen, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Reporting Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:405-17. European Urology, 63, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Thakur, M., Tomar, V.S., Dale, E., Gomella, L.G., Solomides, C., Kolesnikov, O., et al. (2024) Targeting Genomic Receptors in Voided Urine for Confirmation of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. BJUI Compass, 5, 789-794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Makedon, A.M., Sempson, S.X., Hargis, P. and Lloyd, G.L. (2023) Genetic, Genomic, and Heritable Components of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports, 18, 154-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef