机器人肺叶切除术应用及研究进展
Application and Research Progress of Robotic Pulmonary Lobectomy
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1551516, PDF,   
作者: 孙思远:右江民族医学院临床医学院,广西 百色;周一凡*:广西壮族自治区人民医院胸部外科,广西 南宁
关键词: 达芬奇机器人肺叶切除术肺癌Da Vinci Robot Pulmonary Lobectomy Lung Cancer
摘要: 肺癌作为全球恶性肿瘤相关死亡的首要原因,其外科手术治疗始终是首选方式。达芬奇机器人手术系统作为微创外科技术的革命性平台,近年来在胸外科领域实现了从技术探索到常规应用的跨越式发展。相较于传统胸腔镜手术,机器人辅助胸腔镜手术通过三维高清视野、仿生腕器械及震颤过滤系统进一步优化了肺叶切除术的技术路径。本文系统综述机器人辅助肺叶切除术在肺癌治疗中的临床应用进展,探讨远程手术和远程教育的创新发展,展望机器人胸外科手术在未来发展方向。
Abstract: As the leading cause of malignancy related death worldwide, surgical treatment of lung cancer is always the preferred method. As a revolutionary platform of minimally invasive surgical technology, Da Vinci robotic surgical system has achieved a leapfrog development from technical exploration to routine application in the field of thoracic surgery in recent years. Compared with traditional thoracoscopic surgery, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery further optimizes the technical path of pulmonary lobectomy through 3D high-definition visual field, bionic wrist instruments and tremor filtration system. This article systematically reviews the clinical application of robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer, discusses the innovative development of remote surgery and distance education, and looks forward to the future development direction of robotic thoracic surgery.
文章引用:孙思远, 周一凡. 机器人肺叶切除术应用及研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(5): 1469-1476. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1551516

参考文献

[1] 郑荣寿, 陈茹, 韩冰峰, 等. 2022年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2024, 46(3): 221-231.
[2] Thai, A.A., Solomon, B.J., Sequist, L.V., Gainor, J.F. and Heist, R.S. (2021) Lung Cancer. The Lancet, 398, 535-554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Luo, G., Zhang, Y., Etxeberria, J., Arnold, M., Cai, X., Hao, Y., et al. (2023) Projections of Lung Cancer Incidence by 2035 in 40 Countries Worldwide: Population-Based Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 9, e43651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Li, C., Lei, S., Ding, L., Xu, Y., Wu, X., Wang, H., et al. (2023) Global Burden and Trends of Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Chinese Medical Journal, 136, 1583-1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Li, Y., Yan, B. and He, S. (2023) Advances and Challenges in the Treatment of Lung Cancer. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 169, Article ID: 115891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kirby, T.J. and Rice, T.W. (1993) Thoracoscopic Lobectomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 56, 784-786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Melfi, F.M., Menconi, G.F., Mariani, A.M., et al. (2002) Early Experience with Robotic Technology for Thoracoscopic Surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 21, 864-868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Oh, D.S., Tisol, W.B., Cesnik, L., Crosby, A. and Cerfolio, R.J. (2019) Port Strategies for Robot-Assisted Lobectomy by High-Volume Thoracic Surgeons: A Nationwide Survey. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 14, 545-552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Cerfolio, R.J., Bryant, A.S., Skylizard, L. and Minnich, D.J. (2011) Initial Consecutive Experience of Completely Portal Robotic Pulmonary Resection with 4 Arms. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 142, 740-746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Park, B.J., Flores, R.M. and Rusch, V.W. (2006) Robotic Assistance for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgical Lobectomy: Technique and Initial Results. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 131, 54-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Yang, Y., Song, L., Huang, J., Cheng, X. and Luo, Q. (2021) A Uniportal Right Upper Lobectomy by Three-Arm Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Using the Da Vinci (XI) Surgical System in the Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer. Translational Lung Cancer Research, 10, 1571-1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Liu, L., Che, G., Pu, Q., Ma, L., Wu, Y., Kan, Q., et al. (2010) A New Concept of Endoscopic Lung Cancer Resection: Single-Direction Thoracoscopic Lobectomy. Surgical Oncology, 19, e71-e77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Vidanapathirana, C.P., Papoulidis, P., Nardini, M., Trevis, J., Bayliss, C. and Dunning, J. (2019) Subxiphoid Robotic-Assisted Right Pneumonectomy. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 11, 1629-1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Jayakumar, S., Nardini, M., Papoulidis, P. and Dunning, J. (2018) Robotic Right Middle Lobectomy with a Subxiphoid Utility Port. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 26, 1049-1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Zhang, O., Alzul, R., Carelli, M., Melfi, F., Tian, D. and Cao, C. (2022) Complications of Robotic Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Compared to Open Thoracotomy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12, Article No. 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Duggan, M., Kavanagh, B.P. and Warltier, D.C. (2005) Pulmonary Atelectasis: A Pathogenic Perioperative Entity. Anesthesiology, 102, 838-854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Peroni, D.G. and Boner, A.L. (2000) Atelectasis: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Management. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 1, 274-278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Zeng, C., Lagier, D. and Vidal Melo, M.F. (2022) Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Reply. Anesthesiology, 137, 126-127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Leivaditis, V., Skevis, K., Mulita, F., Tsalikidis, C., Mitsala, A., Dahm, M., et al. (2024) Advancements in the Management of Postoperative Air Leak Following Thoracic Surgery: From Traditional Practices to Innovative Therapies. Medicina, 60, Article No. 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Filosso, P.L., Nigra, V.A., Lanza, G., et al. (2015) Digital versus Traditional Air Leak Evaluation after Elective Pulmonary Resection: A Prospective and Comparative Mono-Institutional Study. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 7, 1719-1724.
[21] Campisi, A., Dell’Amore, A., Gabryel, P., Ciarrocchi, A.P., Sielewicz, M., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) Autologous Blood Patch Pleurodesis: A Large Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 114, 273-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Jabłoński, S., Kordiak, J., Wcisło, S., Terlecki, A., Misiak, P., Santorek‐Strumiłło, E., et al. (2016) Outcome of Pleurodesis Using Different Agents in Management Prolonged Air Leakage Following Lung Resection. The Clinical Respiratory Journal, 12, 183-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Passman, R.S., Gingold, D.S., Amar, D., Lloyd-Jones, D., Bennett, C.L., Zhang, H., et al. (2005) Prediction Rule for Atrial Fibrillation after Major Noncardiac Thoracic Surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 79, 1698-1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Zhang, L. and Gao, S. (2016) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Prophylaxis after Lung Surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 67, 351-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Frendl, G., Sodickson, A.C., Chung, M.K., Waldo, A.L., Gersh, B.J., Tisdale, J.E., et al. (2014) 2014 AATS Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter for Thoracic Surgical Procedures. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 148, e153-e193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Hindricks, G., Potpara, T., Dagres, N., Arbelo, E., Bax, J.J., Blomström-Lundqvist, C., et al. (2020) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in Collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal, 42, 373-498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Zhiqiang, W. and Shaohua, M. (2023) Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic‐Assisted versus Video‐Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Thoracic Cancer, 14, 1921-1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Kent, M.S., Hartwig, M.G., Vallières, E., Abbas, A.E., Cerfolio, R.J., Dylewski, M.R., et al. (2021) Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: An Analysis of 5721 Cases. Annals of Surgery, 277, 528-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Gu, Z., Huang, J., Tian, Y., Jiang, L. and Luo, Q. (2022) A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Bi-Port Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy and Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 14, 2970-2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Manolache, V., Motas, N., Bosinceanu, M.L., de la Torre, M., Gallego-Poveda, J., Dunning, J., et al. (2023) Comparison of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Pulmonary Anatomic Resections with Multiport Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study of the European Experience. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 12, 102-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Huang, J., Zhu, H., Lu, P., Li, J., Tian, Y., Takase, Y., et al. (2023) Comparison of Lobectomy Performed through Toumai® Surgical Robot and Da Vinci Surgical Robot in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study of Early Perioperative Results. Translational Lung Cancer Research, 12, 2219-2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Suda, T., Morota, M., Negi, T., Tochii, D. and Tochii, S. (2024) First Case of Major Lung Resection Using the Hinotori™ Surgical Robot System. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 72, 810-813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Aresu, G., Dunning, J., Routledge, T., Bagan, P. and Slack, M. (2022) Preclinical Evaluation of Versius, an Innovative Device for Use in Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 62, ezac178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Al-Mufarrej, F., Margolis, M., Tempesta, B., Strother, E., Najam, F. and Gharagozloo, F. (2010) From Jacobeaus to the Da Vinci: Thoracoscopic Applications of the Robot. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 20, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Shahin, G.M.M., Vos, P.W.K., Hutteman, M., Stigt, J.A. and Braun, J. (2023) Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Stages IIB-IVA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Outcome. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 17, 1587-1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Rubino, F., Smith, M., Vix, M., Simone, M., et al. (2002) Transcontinental Robot-Assisted Remote Telesurgery: Feasibility and Potential Applications. Annals of Surgery, 235, 487-492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Moustris, G., Tzafestas, C. and Konstantinidis, K. (2023) A Long Distance Telesurgical Demonstration on Robotic Surgery Phantoms over 5G. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 18, 1577-1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Tian, W., Fan, M., Zeng, C., Liu, Y., He, D. and Zhang, Q. (2020) Telerobotic Spinal Surgery Based on 5G Network: The First 12 Cases. Neurospine, 17, 114-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Hung, A.J., Chen, J., Shah, A. and Gill, I.S. (2018) Telementoring and Telesurgery for Minimally Invasive Procedures. Journal of Urology, 199, 355-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Reddy, K., Gharde, P., Tayade, H., Patil, M., Reddy, L.S. and Surya, D. (2023) Advancements in Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Overview of Current Utilizations and Upcoming Frontiers. Cureus, 15, e50415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Pfennig, M., Lee, A. and Mi, M. (2022) How Does Telementoring Impact Medical Education within the Surgical Field? A Scoping Review. The American Journal of Surgery, 224, 869-880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Augustin, F. and Bodner, J. (2017) Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Helpful Tool or Just Another Expensive Gadget? Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9, 2881-2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Ehrampoosh, A., Shirinzadeh, B., Pinskier, J., Smith, J., Moshinsky, R. and Zhong, Y. (2022) A Force-Feedback Methodology for Teleoperated Suturing Task in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery. Sensors, 22, Article No. 7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Rao, P.P. (2018) Robotic Surgery: New Robots and Finally Some Real Competition! World Journal of Urology, 36, 537-541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]