符号逻辑视角下的焦循易学思想
Jiao Xun’s Philosophy of the Yi Jing from the Perspective of Symbolic Logic
摘要: 研究以符号逻辑为方法论,系统阐释清代学者焦循易学思想的理论建构及其哲学对原有易学范式的突破。研究聚焦焦循在《雕菰楼易学三书》中提出的“旁通”“相错”“时行”三大法则,通过符号逻辑模型显现其动态辩证特质。旁通法则以阴阳爻位升降构建六十四卦的关联网络,突破传统卦象孤立阐释的局限。相错原理通过卦爻全称倒置形成辩证逻辑组,实现符号系统与自然法则的同构。时行理论则将卦变升华为时空语境中的模态逻辑体系,赋予“变易”以伦理实践智慧。焦循易学通过“象数即理”的本体论重构,将卦爻系统转化为兼具数理逻辑与道德形上学的动态生成模型。既超越乾嘉考据学的实证主义窠臼,又为传统易学注入现代符号学阐释的可能。不仅印证了《周易》“一阴一阳之谓道”的宇宙论本质,更在中西哲学对话中彰显了中国辩证思维的独特性,为易学的创造性转化提供了方法论启示。
Abstract: This study employs symbolic logic as its methodological framework to systematically elucidate the theoretical architecture of Jiao Xun’s Yi Jing philosophy during the Qing dynasty and its philosophical transcendence of traditional hermeneutic paradigms. Focusing on the three principles of pangtong (interconnectedness), xiangcuo (dialectical inversion), and shixing (temporal actualization) articulated in Jiao’s Three Treatises on Yi Studies from the Diaogoulou, the research reveals their dynamic-dialectical characteristics through symbolic-logical modeling. The pangtong principle constructs a relational network of the 64 hexagrams via the ascendant-descendant transformation of yin-yang line positions, thereby overcoming the limitations of isolated hexagram interpretations in classical exegesis. The xiangcuo mechanism generates dialectical logical clusters through the universal inversion of hexagram lines, achieving structural isomorphism between symbolic systems and natural laws. The shixing theory elevates hexagram mutations into a modal-logical framework within spatiotemporal contexts, imbuing the concept of bianyi (metamorphosis) with ethical-practical wisdom. By ontologically reconceptualizing “image-number as principle” (xiangshu ji li), Jiao’s system transforms the hexagram-line structure into a dynamically generative model integrating mathematical logic and moral metaphysics. This approach not only transcends the positivist constraints of Qian-Jia textual scholarship but also injects possibilities for modern semiotic reinterpretation into traditional Yi studies. The framework not only corroborates the cosmological essence of the Yi Jing’s dictum “the alternation of yin and yang constitutes the Dao” (yiyin yiyang zhi wei dao), but also foregrounds the distinctiveness of Chinese dialectical thinking in Sino-Western philosophical dialogue, offering methodological insights for the creative transformation of Yi studies.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
刘大钧. 20世纪的易学研究及其重要特色——《百年易学菁华集成》前言[J]. 周易研究, 2010(1): 3-12.
|
|
[2]
|
陈居渊. 论焦循《孟子正义》的易学诠释[J]. 孔子研究, 2000(1): 103-110.
|
|
[3]
|
郑万耕. 朱熹易学简论[J]. 江西社会科学, 2002(2): 41-45.
|
|
[4]
|
焦循. 雕菰楼易学五种[J]. 古典文学知识, 2015(4): 72.
|
|
[5]
|
黄广华. 《周易》成象说[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 1991(6): 38-43.
|
|
[6]
|
李利. 虞翻“卦变”说、“成既济定”说管窥[J]. 中华文化论坛, 2011, 6(6): 109-114.
|
|
[7]
|
韩振华, 赵娟. 过程哲学视域下的《周易》时间观念[J]. 周易研究, 2012(6): 61-70.
|
|
[8]
|
张朋. 《周易》对阴阳观念的三重表述[J]. 中州学刊, 2023(3): 131-136.
|
|
[9]
|
陈恩林. 略论《周易》的卦变[J]. 周易研究, 1988(2): 14-23.
|