基于序贯博弈的第三方漏洞共享平台信息安全漏洞披露策略分析
Analysis of Information Security Vulnerabilities Disclosure Strategy for Third Party Vulnerability Sharing Platform Based on Sequential Game Theory
摘要: 全球网络威胁日趋严峻,作为网络安全事件产生的根源之一,信息安全漏洞逐渐成为各国网络空间安全战略的重要内容,对信息安全漏洞的披露已是国家网络安全应急体系建设的重要内容之一。本文运用序贯博弈理论深入剖析信息安全漏洞披露中软件供应商、第三方漏洞共享平台、黑客及用户间的漏洞披露策略,揭示各方在不同情境下的最优策略,明晰信息不对称、成本收益等因素对决策的影响。研究发现,软件供应商在权衡成本与声誉损失后决策补丁披露;平台依据信息优势与收益决定漏洞公开;黑客基于入侵成功率和收益实施攻击;用户依据漏洞风险评估选择是否修复。本文为优化漏洞披露机制、提升信息安全管理水平提供理论支撑,对完善信息安全治理体系意义重大。
Abstract: Global cyber threats are becoming increasingly severe, as one of the root causes of network security incidents, information security vulnerabilities have gradually become an important part of Cyberspace Security Strategies in various countries. Disclosing information security vulnerabilities has become an important part of national network security emergency system construction. This paper uses sequential game theory to analyze the vulnerability disclosure strategies among software vendors, third-party vulnerability sharing platforms, hackers and users, to reveal the optimal strategies of each party in different situations, and to clarify the impact of information asymmetry, cost-benefit and other factors on decision-making. The results show that software vendors decide whether to disclose patches by weighing development costs against potential reputation losses; platforms determine whether to publicly disclose vulnerabilities based on their informational advantages and expected returns; hackers launch attacks by assessing the success rate of intrusions and potential gains; and users choose whether to apply fixes based on risk assessments of vulnerabilities. This paper provides a theoretical foundation for optimizing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms and enhancing information security management, and it holds significant implications for improving the overall information security governance system.
文章引用:宋倩文. 基于序贯博弈的第三方漏洞共享平台信息安全漏洞披露策略分析[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(5): 1742-1751. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1451456

参考文献

[1] 黄道丽. 网络安全漏洞披露规则及其体系设计[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(1): 94-106.
[2] Gordon, L.A., Loeb, M.P. and Lucyshyn, W. (2003) Sharing Information on Computer Systems Security: An Economic Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 461-485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Ransbotham, S., Mitra, S. and Ramsey, J. (2012) Are Markets for Vulnerabilities Effective? MIS Quarterly, 36, 43-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Cavusoglu, H., Cavusoglu, H. and Raghunathan, S. (2007) Efficiency of Vulnerability Disclosure Mechanisms to Disseminate Vulnerability Knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33, 171-185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Gordon, L.A., Loeb, M.P. and Sohail, T. (2010) Market Value of Voluntary Disclosures Concerning Information Security. MIS Quarterly, 34, 567-594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Lei, M., Zhou, S.L., Yang, X.X., et al. (2012) The Consequences of Information Technology Control Weaknesses on Management Information Systems: The Case of Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Control Reports. MIS Quarterly, 36, 179-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Wang, T., Kannan, K.N. and Ulmer, J.R. (2013) The Association between the Disclosure and the Realization of Information Security Risk Factors. Information Systems Research, 24, 201-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Tang, Q. and Whinston, A.B. (2015) Improving Internet Security through Mandatory Information Disclosure. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, 5-8 January 2015, 4813-4823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Mitra, S. and Ransbotham, S. (2015) Information Disclosure and the Diffusion of Information Security Attacks. Information Systems Research, 26, 565-584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Hausken, K. (2017) Security Investment, Hacking, and Information Sharing between Firms and between Hackers. Games, 8, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 尹建国. 美国网络信息安全治理机制及其对我国之启示[J]. 法商研究, 2013, 30(2): 138-146.
[12] 陈美. 国家信息安全协同治理: 美国的经验与启示[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(2): 10-14.
[13] 张涛, 王玥, 黄道丽. 信息系统安全治理框架: 欧盟的经验与启示——基于网络攻击的视角[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(8): 17-24.
[14] 董俊祺. 韩国网络空间的主体博弈对我国信息安全治理的启示——以韩国网络实名制政策为例[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 34(4): 153-157.
[15] 蒋鲁宁. 信息安全供应链的安全[J]. 中国信息安全, 2014(3): 111.
[16] 谢宗晓, 林润辉, 王兴起. 用户参与对信息安全管理有效性的影响——多重中介方法[J]. 管理科学, 2013, 26(3): 65-76.
[17] 林润辉, 谢宗晓, 王兴起, 等. 制度压力、信息安全合法化与组织绩效——基于中国企业的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016, 32(2): 112-127.
[18] 甄杰, 谢宗晓, 林润辉. 治理机制、制度化与企业信息安全绩效[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2018, 23(3): 171-176.
[19] 陈昊, 李文立, 陈立荣. 组织控制与信息安全制度遵守: 面子倾向的调节效应[J]. 管理科学, 2016, 29(3): 1-12.
[20] 甄杰, 谢宗晓, 董坤祥. 信息安全压力与员工违规意愿: 被调节的中介效应[J]. 管理科学, 2018, 31(4): 91-102.