农村宅基地使用权有偿退出法律制度完善
Improvement of the Legal System for Paid Withdrawal of Rural Homestead Use Rights
摘要: 随着我国城镇化进程的加快,选择进城务工的农户大量增加,这种情况下基于集体经济组织成员身份而取得的宅基地被闲置,农村土地资源浪费现象严重。同时在“一户一宅”和宅基地面积限额的法律政策背景下,因非法占有、继承、结婚、分户等实际情况所导致的“一户多宅”现状,农村土地资源浪费且面临重大法律隐患。2018年中共中央、国务院提出继续深化农村土地改革,完善农民闲置宅基地和闲置农房政策,继续探索“三权分置”改革。这就保障农户在“住有所居”的基础上,对宅基地财产性功能的继续探索。而宅基地使用权退出制度就是在此政策背景下探索出的解决路径方案之一,但宅基地使用权有偿退出制度在我国法律规范并不明确。本文主要对宅基地使用权有偿退出内涵以及应遵循的原则进行基本介绍,分析宅基地使用权有偿退出的制度构建的必然性,从而提出农村宅基地使用权有偿退出所面临的法律困境并提出对策优化。
Abstract: With the acceleration of urbanization in our country, there has been a significant increase in the number of farmers who choose to work in cities. In this situation, homesteads obtained based on membership in collective economic organizations are idle, leading to serious waste of rural land resources. Under the legal policy background of “one household, one homestead” and the limit of homestead area, the current situation of “one household, multiple homesteads” caused by illegal occupation, inheritance, marriage, and household separation has led to the waste of rural land resources and significant legal risks. In 2018, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council proposed to continue deepening rural land reform, improve policies for idle rural homesteads and houses, and continue to explore the “separation of three rights” reform. This ensures that farmers continue to explore the property functions of homestead land on the basis of “having a place to live”. The withdrawal system of the right to use homestead land is one of the solutions explored under this policy background, but the paid withdrawal system of the right to use homestead land is not clear in China’s legal norms. This article mainly introduces the connotation and principles of paid withdrawal of rural homestead use rights, analyzes the inevitability of the institutional construction of paid withdrawal of homestead use rights, and puts forward the legal difficulties faced by paid withdrawal of rural homestead use rights and proposes countermeasures for optimization.
文章引用:刘子琪. 农村宅基地使用权有偿退出法律制度完善[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(5): 544-550. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.145425

参考文献

[1] 阎其华, 邢晓琳. 我国农村宅基地使用权退出法律机制研究[J]. 辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报, 2024(2): 99-104.
[2] 赵佩芳, 丁德昌. 乡村振兴进程中宅基地退出的法律机制[J]. 中国集体经济, 2023(13): 86-89.
[3] 贾璐. 乡村振兴视域下农村宅基地退出的法律完善[J]. 自然资源情报, 2022(9): 23-28.
[4] 史卫民, 胡睿. 城乡融合发展中农村宅基地退出的法律完善[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2020(9): 106-118.
[5] 吕军书, 张晓. 论我国农村宅基地退出的立法构造[J]. 理论与改革, 2020(4): 150-160.
[6] 刘晨阳, 房建恩. 宅基地使用权退出的实践考察及立法回应[J]. 自然资源情报, 2023(4): 26-31.
[7] 谢珍容, 史卫民. 乡村振兴视阈下宅基地退出补偿的困境和优化[J]. 湖南警察学院学报, 2023, 35(1): 5-13.
[8] 冀嘉欣. 农村宅基地使用权有偿退出法律问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学法学院, 2022.
[9] 祁全明. 乡村振兴战略下农村闲置宅基地有偿退出机制研究[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2022, 37(4): 67-75.
[10] 李邦. 乡村振兴背景下宅基地退出法律制度探究[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 33(4): 73-79.
[11] 王杨, 杜腾舟. “三权分置”背景下我国宅基地退出法律制度研究[J]. 黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版), 2022, 22(10): 72-77.