碳关税壁垒对我国制造业出口的影响
Research on the Impact of Carbon Tariff Barriers on China’s Manufacturing Exports
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1451485, PDF,   
作者: 杨泽辉:武汉科技大学法学与经济学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 碳关税双循环制造业出口绿色转型Carbon Tariff Dual Circulation Manufacturing Exports Green Transformation
摘要: 随着欧盟碳边境调节机制(CBAM)的实施,碳关税逐渐成为发达国家平衡气候目标与产业竞争的新兴工具,对中国制造业出口构成多重挑战。本文以“双循环”战略为背景,系统分析碳关税对中国制造业出口的短期、中期与长期影响路径:短期表现为价格攀升与出口量收缩的双重挤压,中期倒逼产业结构被动调整,长期则驱动企业向绿色技术主导的主动转型。研究表明,碳关税的冲击本质是外循环压力与内循环韧性动态博弈的过程,其影响深度依赖于国内低碳竞争力与国际规则话语权的协同提升。基于此,本文提出“双循环复合应对框架”,从政策、技术与市场三维度构建响应体系,包括国内碳定价对冲机制、绿色内需激活策略、区域性低碳标准互认等举措,旨在帮助中国制造业实现从“被动合规”到“主动引领”的转型,稳固全球竞争力并为气候治理贡献中国方案。
Abstract: With the implementation of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), carbon tariffs have gradually become a new tool for developed countries to balance climate goals and industrial competition, posing multiple challenges to China’s manufacturing exports. Against the backdrop of the “Dual Circulation” strategy, this paper systematically analyzes the short-term, medium-term, and long-term impact pathways of carbon tariffs on China’s manufacturing exports. In the short term, it is manifested as the dual squeeze of rising prices and shrinking export volumes. In the medium term, it forces a passive adjustment of the industrial structure. In the long term, it drives enterprises to actively transform towards a green technology-led model. The research shows that the impact of carbon tariffs is essentially a dynamic game process between the pressure of the external circulation and the resilience of the internal circulation, and the depth of its impact depends heavily on the coordinated improvement of domestic low-carbon competitiveness and the right to speak in international rules. Based on this, this paper proposes a “Composite Response Framework for Dual Circulation,” constructing a response system from three dimensions of policy, technology, and market. It includes measures such as the domestic carbon pricing hedging mechanism, the activation strategy for green domestic demand, and the mutual recognition of regional low-carbon standards. The aim is to help China’s manufacturing industry achieve the transformation from “passive compliance” to “active leadership”, consolidate its global competitiveness, and contribute China’s solutions to climate governance.
文章引用:杨泽辉. 碳关税壁垒对我国制造业出口的影响[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(5): 1988-1996. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1451485

参考文献

[1] 韩立群. 欧盟碳关税政策及其影响[J]. 现代国际关系, 2021(5): 51-59+61.
[2] 邢政. 欧美的碳足迹管理经验和措施[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(8): 1-4.
[3] 晏清. 环境保护还是贸易壁垒?——碳关税对钢铁行业的经济与环境影响研究[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(2): 120-135.
[4] 陈迎. 碳公平视角下碳关税的内在缺陷、深层冲突与国际协同治理[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(7): 1-13.
[5] Ramadhani, D.P. and Koo, Y. (2022) Comparative Analysis of Carbon Border Tax Adjustment and Domestic Carbon Tax under General Equilibrium Model: Focusing on the Indonesian Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, Article ID: 134288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Bayat, T., Ozsalman, E. and Derindag, O.F. (2025) Evaluating Export Vulnerability through Import Demand Elasticity in Carbon Border Adjustment Contexts: A Focus on Türkiye. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32, 2238-2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Sikdar, C. (2025) Impact of Eu’s Carbon Border Tax on South Asian Trade Partners. Asia Europe Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Erdogdu, E. (2025) The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Opportunities and Challenges for Non‐EU Countries. WIREs Energy and Environment, 14, e70000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Majumder, P., Mathur, S. and Pohit, S. (2024) Impact of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism—Evidence from India and Other Selected Trading Partners of EU. Green and Low-Carbon Economy. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhou, X., Zhu, Q., Xu, L., Wang, K., Yin, X. and Mangla, S.K. (2024) The Effect of Carbon Tariffs and the Associated Coping Strategies: A Global Supply Chain Perspective. Omega, 122, Article ID: 102960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 侯升平. 碳关税对中国塑胶行业出口贸易的影响——基于GTAP模拟的研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2019(11): 134-139.
[12] 屠年松, 余维珩. 碳关税对制造业全球价值链嵌入的影响研究——基于WTO改革背景[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(9): 25-31.
[13] 尹佳音, 李大伟. 碳边境调整机制(CBAM)对中国对欧盟货物出口的影响研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2024(11): 93-108.
[14] 朱若昕, 黄楠. 国际碳壁垒对中国出口企业碳管理的影响研究[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2024(12): 50-57.
[15] 蒲清平, 杨聪林. 构建“双循环”新发展格局的现实逻辑、实施路径与时代价值[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 26(6): 24-34.
[16] 赵禹程, 徐潜, 周为, 等. 中国钢铁出口受碳边境调节机制影响与对策[J]. 钢铁, 2025, 60(1): 191-203.
[17] 石红莲, 赵越. 美国拟征收碳关税对我国出口贸易的影响分析[J]. 生态经济, 2018, 34(2): 61-65.
[18] 付亚蒙. 碳关税对我国机电产品出口影响[J]. 市场研究, 2020(1): 26-27.
[19] 钟晓君, 吴建新. 碳关税的本质、影响与应对策略: 中国制造业出口企业视角[J]. 学术探索, 2023(12): 124-128.
[20] 中国人民银行广东省分行金融研究处课题组, 何伟刚. 发达经济体碳关税政策冲击与中国的应对之策——基于GTAP-E模型的模拟分析[J]. 南方金融, 2023(8): 3-21.
[21] 沈可挺. 碳关税争端及其对中国制造业的影响[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010(1): 65-74.
[22] 邓嵩松, 鹿洪源, 郭权. 欧盟碳关税对我国的影响和对策[J]. 税务研究, 2023(12): 80-86.
[23] 赵凯, 张尔佳, 高敏. 碳关税与中国产业结构相关性研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(3): 32-37.
[24] 吴金艳. 碳关税对我国制造业出口的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东财经大学, 2023.
[25] 杨帆, 丑洁明, 董文杰, 等. 关税变化对中国贸易碳排放的影响研究[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2022, 27(1): 197-205.
[26] 李伟, 刘行. 考虑CBAM的中国外贸钢铁碳减排前景分析——基于隐含碳强度预测[J]. 工业技术经济, 2024, 43(8): 118-128.
[27] 董玮, 石晶晶. 欧盟碳关税对中国的经贸冲击及应对策略[J]. 生态经济, 2025, 41(1): 89-98.