不同喷嘴阵列条件下大功率芯片的纳米流体换热性能数值仿真
Numerical Simulation of Nanofluid Heat Transfer Performance of High-Power Chips under Different Nozzle Array Conditions
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.145431, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张天瑞*, 李 壮#, 周世铤:辽宁石油化工大学石油天然气工程学院,辽宁 抚顺
关键词: 高热流密度芯片射流阵列喷嘴结构纳米流体冷却性能High Heat Flux Chip Jet Array Nozzle Structure Nanofluids Cooling Performance
摘要: 随着电子技术的不断发展,芯片的散热问题变得越来越关键。传统散热技术在面对高热流密度时存在诸多不足之处,而射流冲击技术因其高效和快速等优势而备受关注。文章基于特定的腔体结构,采用数值模拟方法研究了三种不同的喷嘴–阵列形式和四种喷嘴结构,以及不同浓度的纳米流体对高热流密度芯片冷却性能的影响。研究结果表明:在对比喷嘴数量的案例中,相同条件下五个喷嘴均匀排布比三个喷嘴均匀排布模拟芯片的底面最高温度低了7.07 K;对比喷嘴结构的案例中,倒角型喷嘴的性能最好,模拟芯片的底面温度最高值仅309.92 K;对于3%浓度的氧化铝纳米流体而言,其换热性能比2%的纳米流体提升了11.1%,比4%浓度的只下降了8.3%。研究结果可为芯片散热技术优化提供重要的参考依据。
Abstract: With the continuous advancement of electronic technology, thermal management in chips has become increasingly critical. Traditional cooling technologies exhibit significant limitations in addressing high heat flux conditions, while jet impingement technology has gained prominence due to its high efficiency and rapid cooling capabilities. This study investigates the cooling performance of high heat flux chips using numerical simulations based on a specific cavity structure, focusing on three nozzle-array configurations, four nozzle geometries, and varying nanofluid concentrations. Key findings include: Under identical conditions, a uniform five-nozzle arrangement reduced the maximum temperature at the simulated chip’s bottom surface by 7.07 K compared to a three-nozzle configuration. Among nozzle structures, the chamfered nozzle demonstrated optimal performance, achieving a maximum bottom surface temperature of 309.92 K. For a 3% alumina nanofluid concentration, heat transfer performance improved by 11.1% compared to 2% concentration, with only an 8.3% reduction relative to the 4% concentration. These results provide critical insights for optimizing chip cooling technologies.
文章引用:张天瑞, 李壮, 周世铤. 不同喷嘴阵列条件下大功率芯片的纳米流体换热性能数值仿真[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(5): 754-767. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.145431

参考文献

[1] Lall, P., Pecht, M. and Hakim, E. (1997) Influence of Temperature on Microelectronics and System Reliability. CRC Press.
[2] Chen, X. (2000) A Brief Discussion on the Failure of Electronic Components. Electronic Components and Materials, No.4, 42-43.
[3] Wang, B., Zhu, K., Wang, Y., et al. (2017) Cooling and Flow Performance of Fin and Water Cooled CPU Chip Radiator. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 36, 2031-2037.
[4] Zhu, K., Wang, H., Wang, J., et al. (2015) Experimental Research and Numerical Simulation of Chip Heaters with Enhanced Heat Transfer Structure. Journal of Refrigeration, 36, 46-51.
[5] Ramadhan, A.A., Kapur, N., Summers, J.L. and Thompson, H.M. (2018) Numerical Development of EHD Cooling Systems for Laptop Applications. Applied Thermal Engineering, 139, 144-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Wei, B., Yang, M., Wang, Z., Xu, H. and Zhang, Y. (2015) Flow and Thermal Performance of a Water-Cooled Periodic Transversal Elliptical Microchannel Heat Sink for Chip Cooling. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 15, 3061-3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Robinson, A.J. (2009) A Thermal-Hydraulic Comparison of Liquid Microchannel and Impinging Liquid Jet Array Heat Sinks for High-Power Electronics Cooling. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 32, 347-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Han, Y., Lau, B.L., Zhang, X., Leong, Y.C. and Choo, K.F. (2014) Thermal Management of Hotspots with a Microjet-Based Hybrid Heat Sink for GaN-on-Si Devices. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, 4, 1441-1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Martin, H. (1977) Heat and Mass Transfer between Impinging Gas Jets and Solid Surfaces. In: Advances in Heat Transfer, Elsevier, 1-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Mangate, L.D. and Chaudhari, M.B. (2016) Experimental Study on Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Heat Sink with Multiple-Orifice Synthetic Jet. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 103, 1181-1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Shariatmadar, H., Mousavian, S., Sadoughi, M. and Ashjaee, M. (2016) Experimental and Numerical Study on Heat Transfer Characteristics of Various Geometrical Arrangement of Impinging Jet Arrays. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 102, 26-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Vinze, R., Chandel, S., Limaye, M.D. and Prabhu, S.V. (2016) Influence of Jet Temperature and Nozzle Shape on the Heat Transfer Distribution between a Smooth Plate and Impinging Air Jets. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 99, 136-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Bu, X., Peng, L., Lin, G., Bai, L. and Wen, D. (2015) Experimental Study of Jet Impingement Heat Transfer on a Variable-Curvature Concave Surface in a Wing Leading Edge. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 90, 92-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Lee, J., Ren, Z., Ligrani, P., Lee, D.H., Fox, M.D. and Moon, H. (2014) Cross-Flow Effects on Impingement Array Heat Transfer with Varying Jet-to-Target Plate Distance and Hole Spacing. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 75, 534-544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Wae-hayee, M., Tekasakul, P., Eiamsa-ard, S. and Nuntadusit, C. (2014) Effect of Cross-Flow Velocity on Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Impinging Jet with Low Jet-to-Plate Distance. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28, 2909-2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Garimella, S.V. and Nenaydykh, B. (1996) Nozzle-Geometry Effects in Liquid Jet Impingement Heat Transfer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 39, 2915-2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wolf, D.H., Incropera, F.P. and Viskanta, R. (1993) Jet Impingement Boiling. In: Advances in Heat Transfer, Elsevier, 1-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Colucci, D.W. and Viskanta, R. (1996) Effect of Nozzle Geometry on Local Convective Heat Transfer to a Confined Impinging Air Jet. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 13, 71-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Xue, R., Lin, X., Ruan, Y., Chen, L. and Hou, Y. (2022) Cooling Performance of Multi-Nozzle Spray with Liquid Nitrogen. Cryogenics, 121, Article 103389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Aksoy, Y.T., Zhu, Y., Eneren, P., Koos, E. and Vetrano, M.R. (2020) The Impact of Nanofluids on Droplet/Spray Cooling of a Heated Surface: A Critical Review. Energies, 14, Article 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Hsieh, S., Leu, H. and Liu, H. (2015) Spray Cooling Characteristics of Nanofluids for Electronic Power Devices. Nanoscale Research Letters, 10, Article No. 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Hsieh, S., Liu, H. and Yeh, Y. (2016) Nanofluids Spray Heat Transfer Enhancement. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 94, 104-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Ashish Saha, A. and Mitra, S.K. (2009) Effect of Dynamic Contact Angle in a Volume of Fluid (VOF) Model for a Microfluidic Capillary Flow. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 339, 461-480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kang, C., Li, W., Jin, J., et al. (2024) Evaporation Characteristics of Single Free-Falling Liquefied Natural Gas Droplet under Different Ambient Conditions Based on the VOF Method. Cryogenics, 143, Article 103928.
[25] Ghasemi, S.E., Ranjbar, A.A. and Hosseini, M.J. (2017) Experimental Evaluation of Cooling Performance of Circular Heat Sinks for Heat Dissipation from Electronic Chips Using Nanofluid. Mechanics Research Communications, 84, 85-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef