城市政府数据开放能力的驱动机制与优化策略
Driving Mechanism and Optimization Strategy of City Government Data Opening Capability
摘要: 政府数据开放已成为提升治理效能、促进社会经济创新的关键举措,政府透明度与服务效率作为重要的影响因素,对数据开放能力的作用机制亟待深入探究。以城市政府数据开放现状为研究重点,以全国289个城市为研究样本,采用线性回归分析方法,系统论述了政府透明度、服务效率、影响效果以及数据开放能力的作用路径等方面的问题。研究发现,政府透明度越高,公众对政府数据的信任度与参与度也会相应提高,进而促使政府加强数据开放平台建设,显著增强数据开放能力;同时,政府服务效率的提升能够优化行政流程与资源配置,为数据开放提供坚实支撑,促进数据的高效整理与发布。进一步分析表明,数字基础设施在政府透明度与服务效率影响数据开放能力的过程中发挥着重要的中介作用。基于研究结论,本文提出深化信息公开机制、推进政务服务流程再造、加大基础设施投入力度以及精准数字科技投入和加强人才培养等提升数据开放能力的策略建议,旨在为政府数据开放实践提供理论依据和行动指南,推动城市政府数据开放水平的整体提升,助力数字时代政府治理能力现代化建设。
Abstract: The opening of government data has emerged as a crucial measure for enhancing governance efficacy and facilitating socio-economic innovation. Government transparency and service efficiency, as significant influencing factors, call for an in-depth exploration of their functional mechanisms on data opening capabilities. With a focus on the current status of government data opening in cities and taking 289 cities nationwide as the research samples, and by employing linear regression analysis methods, this paper systematically expounds upon issues such as the role paths of government transparency, service efficiency, impact effects, and data opening capabilities. The research reveals that the higher the government transparency, the greater the public’s trust and participation in government data, thereby motivating the government to strengthen the construction of data opening platforms and significantly enhance data opening capabilities. Simultaneously, the improvement of government service efficiency can optimize administrative processes and resource allocation, providing a solid underpinning for data opening and promoting the efficient organization and release of data. Further analysis indicates that digital infrastructure plays a vital mediating role in the process where government transparency and service efficiency influence data opening capabilities. Based on the research conclusions, this paper proposes strategies and suggestions for enhancing data opening capabilities, such as deepening the information disclosure mechanism, advancing the reengineering of government service processes, increasing investment in infrastructure, precisely allocating investment in digital technology, and strengthening talent cultivation. The aim is to provide theoretical foundations and action guidelines for the practice of government data opening, promote the overall elevation of government data opening levels in cities, and contribute to the modernization of government governance capabilities in the digital era.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Huijboom, N. and Van den Broek, T. (2011) Open Data: An International Comparison of Strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12, 4-16.
|
|
[2]
|
齐艳芬, 孙钰, 张家安, 等. 城市政府开放数据行为影响因素实证研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(5): 94-100.
|
|
[3]
|
郑磊. 开放政府数据研究: 概念辨析、关键因素及其互动关系[J]. 中国行政管理, 2015(11): 13-18.
|
|
[4]
|
李卓, 刘少鹏, 闫晓静. 有为政府与活力社会: 数字社会治理的理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 26(3): 38-51.
|
|
[5]
|
周济南. 数字技术赋能城市社区合作治理: 逻辑、困境及纾解路径[J]. 理论月刊, 2021(11): 50-60.
|
|
[6]
|
苏昊昕, 赵玉攀. 政府数据开放水平的影响因素——基于我国地级市面板数据的研究[J]. 情报探索, 2022(10): 77-84.
|
|
[7]
|
刘晴, 冉连. 开放政府数据利用行为: 影响因素和实现路径——基于Meta-Analysis和fsQCA的混合分析方法[J/OL]. 情报科学, 1-21. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1264.g2.20240507.0859.004.html, 2025-03-21.
|
|
[8]
|
陈美, 何祺. 开放政府数据的隐私风险关键影响因素识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8): 40-49.
|
|
[9]
|
陶志梅, 苏璐丹. 政府开放数据用户使用意愿影响因素研究——基于自我效能理论和计划行为理论[J]. 管理学刊, 2022, 35(6): 112-127.
|
|
[10]
|
齐艳芬, 孙钰, 张家安, 等. 城市政府开放数据行为影响因素实证研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(5): 94-100.
|
|
[11]
|
吴应强, 李白杨, 石乐怡. 政府数据开放平台效率评估及影响因素实证研究——基于无导向SBM-Malmquist-Tobit模型[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44(7): 74-83.
|
|
[12]
|
中国开放数林指数网[Z/OL]. http://ifopendata.fudan.edu.cn/
|
|
[13]
|
Sol, D.A.D. (2013) The Institutional, Economic and Social Determinants of Local Government Transparency. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16, 90-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
曹慧琴, 张廷君. 城市政府数据开放平台发展的影响因素及提升建议[J]. 城市问题, 2020(12): 100-109.
|
|
[15]
|
马亮. 政府信息公开的影响因素: 中国地级市的实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(9): 142-146+151.
|