隧道火灾逃生情况对防火门压力影响的研究
Study on the Influence of Tunnel Fire Escape Situations on the Pressure of Fire Door
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.145462, PDF,   
作者: 汪丹杰:上海理工大学环境与建筑学院,上海
关键词: 隧道火灾人员逃生防火门压力数值模拟Tunnel Fire Personnel Escape Fire Door Pressure Numerical Simulation
摘要: 隧道火灾中的人员逃生安全与防火门压力动态响应密切相关,而现有设计标准对防火门布局与加压送风系统的协同机制缺乏系统性指导。本研究以直线型隧道逃生通道为对象,通过建立三维流体动力学模型,结合加压送风量、防火门间距及开启位置等参数,系统分析不同逃生场景下防火门压力分布规律。研究采用数值模拟方法,设计6种防火门开启模式进行探究。结果表明:当开启的防火门距离送风口超过临界范围时,门体最大压力达68.3~70.3 Pa,显著超出规范允许范围,可能导致门体无法开启;而靠近送风口的开启模式下压力值稳定于34.5~42.5 Pa,满足安全要求。此外,连续开启相邻防火门的开门阻力较间隔开启模式有所增加,表明在条件允许的情况下,逃生路径规划需优先分散门体开启位置。本研究旨在为隧道火灾安全设计提供理论支撑与工程参考。
Abstract: The safety of personnel escape in tunnel fires is closely related to the dynamic response of fire door pressure. However, the existing design standards lack systematic guidance on the coordination mechanism of fire door layout and pressurized air supply system. In this study, the linear tunnel escape channel is taken as the object. By establishing a three-dimensional fluid dynamics model, combined with parameters such as pressurized air supply volume, fire door spacing, and opening position, the pressure distribution law of fire doors under different escape scenarios is systematically analyzed. The research designs six kinds of fire door opening modes using numerical simulation methods. The results show that when the distance between the opening fire door and the air supply outlet exceeds the critical range, the maximum pressure of the door body reaches 68.3~70.3 Pa, which is significantly beyond the allowable range of the specification and may cause the door body to fail to open. The pressure value is stable at 34.5~42.5 Pa in the opening mode near the air supply port, which meets the safety requirements. In addition, the opening resistance of the continuous opening of adjacent fire doors is increased compared with the interval opening mode, indicating that the escape path planning needs to preferentially disperse the opening position of the door body when conditions permit. The purpose of this study is to provide theoretical support and engineering reference for tunnel fire safety design.
文章引用:汪丹杰. 隧道火灾逃生情况对防火门压力影响的研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(5): 1119-1127. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.145462

参考文献

[1] 谭因军, 王柯力, 张恒, 等. 10 km级特长公路隧道自然风对火灾烟气蔓延的影响[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025, 62(1): 103-113.
[2] 吴延奎, 蒋能飞. 高层建筑前室机械加压送风系统旁通泄压阀超压控制措施分析[J]. 制冷, 2021, 40(2): 73-76.
[3] 房轶韵. 机械加压送风系统超压控制措施分析[J]. 建筑热能通风空调, 2016, 35(5): 68-71, 30.
[4] 孙于萍, 赵国敏, 梁茵, 等. 正压区域疏散门开启可靠性分析[J]. 建筑热能通风空调, 2018, 37(10): 72-74.
[5] 卢政强. 防火门开启力的理论计算及影响因素分析[C]//中国消防协会. 中国消防协会科学技术年会论文集: 2016年卷. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2016: 89-91.
[6] 李削云, 马险峰, 王俊淞. 公路隧道火灾逃生疏散研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(5): 66-71.
[7] 甘廷霞, 江梦梦, 张泽江. 海底公路隧道纵向疏散模式研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2015, 34(4): 460-463.
[8] 谢宝超, 楚坤坤, 赵家明, 等. 超长距离盾构隧道疏散通道加压送风系统研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2021, 17(11): 137-143.
[9] 田利伟, 于靖华, 毕庆焕, 等. 某特大型铁路站房渗透风控制与新风利用技术低碳特性[J]. 暖通空调, 2024, 54(S2): 283-287.
[10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 51251-2017 建筑防烟排烟系统技术标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2018.
[11] 孙于萍, 赵国敏. 加压送风系统压力计算方法研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(4): 492-494.
[12] 姜学鹏, 屈裕坤, 袁丁. 特长跨海公路隧道竖井组协同风量与防排烟设计研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(12): 4598-4607.
[13] 宁义君, 顾洪宇, 朱东宇, 等. 迎风格式在水滴欧拉方程数值求解中的应用[J]. 航空科学技术, 2024, 35(1): 105-114.
[14] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50073-2013 洁净厂房设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013.
[15] Ansys Inc (2019) Ansys Fluent 12. 0 UDF Manual.
https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/udf/main_pre.htm
[16] Chai, T. and Draxler, R.R. (2014) Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE)? Arguments against Avoiding RMSE in the Literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 1247-1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50016-2014 建筑设计防火规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2018.
[18] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 51251-2017 建筑防烟排烟系统技术标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2018.