基于组合赋权——TOPSIS-GRA的新能源汽车产品更新方案决策方法
A Decision-Making Method for New Energy Vehicle Product Renewal Program Based on Portfolio Assignment—TOPSIS-GRA
摘要: 为了实现新能源汽车产品更新方案的评价与决策,依据评价指标体系的构建原则,构建了新能源汽车产品更新方案评价指标体系。同时,基于组合专家打分法、熵权法、TOPSIS法和GRA法提出组合赋权——TOPSIS-GRA的新能源汽车产品更新方案决策方法。采用专家打分法进行主观权重计算,熵权法进行客观权重计算,并进行非线性乘法结合完成最终权重分配,将TOPSIS法中的正理想解作为目标序列引入GRA法,将更新方案的多项指标综合成单一指标,从而实现更新方案的排序和优选。最后,针对过程中决策者偏好问题和评价指标权重问题进行敏感性分析,验证了方法的稳定性和可靠性。
Abstract: In order to realize the evaluation and decision-making of new energy vehicle product renewal program, based on the construction principle of evaluation index system, the evaluation index system of new energy vehicle product renewal program is constructed. Meanwhile, the decision-making method of new energy automobile product renewal program of combination empowerment—TOPSIS-GRA is proposed based on combination expert scoring method, entropy weight method, TOPSIS method and GRA method. The expert scoring method is used for subjective weight calculation, the entropy weight method is used for objective weight calculation, and the nonlinear multiplication method is combined to complete the final weight allocation, and the positive ideal solution in the TOPSIS method is introduced into the GRA method as the target sequence, so as to synthesize the multiple indexes of the updating scheme into a single one, thus realizing the sorting and preference of the updating scheme. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is carried out for the problem of decision-maker preference and the problem of evaluation index weights in the process to verify the stability and reliability of the method.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
林浩屹, 李奋强, 周爱民. 产品生命周期下企业多认知主体的多属性决策[J]. 机械设计, 2024, 41(2): 162-169.
|
|
[2]
|
孔琳, 王黎明, 吕晓腾, 等. 基于多层级约束满足问题的产品全生命周期设计方案决策研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(11): 276-289.
|
|
[3]
|
尤天慧, 张瑾, 樊治平. 基于情感分析和证据理论的多属性在线评论决策方法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(3): 536-544.
|
|
[4]
|
Yu, S., Zhang, X., Du, Z. and Chen, Y. (2023) A New Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method for Overvalued Star Ratings Adjustment and Its Application in New Energy Vehicle Selection. Mathematics, 11, Article 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
聂雷, 杨拓, 张俊杰, 等. 基于多属性决策和k-means聚类的车载安全消息中继选择方法[J]. 武汉大学学报(理学版), 2023, 69(5): 609-616.
|
|
[6]
|
陈智雯, 李拙人, 吴俊贤, 等. 基于多属性决策的多车自主泊车路径全局规划方法[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(S1): 135-139.
|
|
[7]
|
庞庆华, 杜栋. 基于AHP方法的企业生产系统柔性评价[J]. 科技管理研究, 2005(9): 195-196+200.
|
|
[8]
|
郭亚军, 易平涛, 李玲玉. 基于随机模拟的综合评价方法及应用[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 31(10): 1499-1503.
|
|
[9]
|
Drucker, P.F. (2002) The Discipline of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80, 1-9.
|
|
[10]
|
郑祖芳, 张潇文, 汪曦. 残膜回收机设计方案的评价与决策研究[J/OL]. 机械设计与制造, 1-4. 2025-05-30.[CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
李雪瑞, 侯幸刚, 杨梅, 等. 基于多层次灰色综合评价法的工业设计方案优选决策模型及其应用[J]. 图学学报, 2021, 42(4): 670-679.
|