遗传学视角下皮肤菌群与痤疮的因果关联:两样本孟德尔随机化研究
The Causal Relationship between Skin Microbiota and Acne from a Genetic Perspective: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
摘要: 背景:皮肤微生物群(SM)与痤疮发展风险之间的因果关系仍不确定。通过进行一项单变量和多变量孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以调查它们是否与痤疮有因果关系。方法:进行双样本MR分析,以调查SM和痤疮之间的潜在因果关系。MR分析主要采用逆方差加权法,以及加权中位数法、MR-Egger回归和加权模式。此外,采用Cochran’s Q、MR-Egger截距、MR-PRESSO和留一分析检验MR分析结果的可靠性。结果:逆方差加权法显示微球菌属、ASV004、ASV008和ASV070是痤疮的保护因素。相反,杆菌类和葡萄球菌属是痤疮的危险因素。此外,金黄杆菌属、不动杆菌属、拟杆菌属、ASV001、ASV003和ASV016与痤疮有潜在关联。此外,在门、目和科水平上,没有发现SM和痤疮之间的因果关系。结论:双样本MR分析揭示了SM和痤疮之间的因果关系,可能为未来SM介导的痤疮发病机制的机制和临床研究提供有价值的新见解。
Abstract: Background: The causal relationship between skin microbiota (SM) and the risk of acne development remains uncertain. We performed a univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate whether they are causally related to acne. Methods: We performed two-sample MR analysis to investigate the potential causal relationship between SM and acne. The MR analysis was performed primarily using the inverse variance weighting method, and secondarily using the weighted median method, MR-Egger regression, and weighted mode. In addition, the reliability of the MR analysis results was tested using Cochran’s Q, MR-Egger intercept, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out analysis. Results: The inverse variance weighting method showed that Micrococcus, ASV004, ASV008, and ASV070 were protective factors for acne. In contrast, Bacillus and Staphylococcus were risk factors for acne. In addition, Chryseobacterium, Acinetobacter, Bacteroides, ASV001, ASV003, and ASV016 were suggestive associations with acne. Furthermore, no causal relationship between SM and acne was found at the phylum, order, and family levels. Conclusion: Our MR analysis revealed a causal relationship between SM and acne, which may provide valuable new insights into the mechanistic and clinical studies of SM-mediated acne pathogenesis in the future.
文章引用:陈思沿, 车宇慧, 陈木兰, 韩雯, 郭静. 遗传学视角下皮肤菌群与痤疮的因果关联:两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(6): 363-369. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1561734

参考文献

[1] Ipci, K., Altıntoprak, N., Muluk, N.B., Senturk, M. and Cingi, C. (2016) The Possible Mechanisms of the Human Microbiome in Allergic Diseases. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 274, 617-626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Titus, S. and Hodge, J. (2012) Diagnosis and Treatment of Acne. American Family Physician, 86, 734-740.
[3] Dréno, B., Dagnelie, M.A., Khammari, A. and Corvec, S. (2020) The Skin Microbiome: A New Actor in Inflammatory Acne. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 21, 18-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Yang, Y., Qu, L., Mijakovic, I. and Wei, Y. (2022) Advances in the Human Skin Microbiota and Its Roles in Cutaneous Diseases. Microbial Cell Factories, 21, Article No. 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Dreno, B., Dekio, I., Baldwin, H., Demessant, A.L., Dagnelie, M., Khammari, A., et al. (2023) Acne Microbiome: From Phyla to Phylotypes. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 38, 657-664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Dréno, B. (2017) What Is New in the Pathophysiology of Acne, an Overview. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 31, 8-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Rinninella, E., Raoul, P., Cintoni, M., Franceschi, F., Miggiano, G.A.D., Gasbarrini, A., et al. (2019) What Is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms, 7, Article 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Zang, C., Liu, J., Mao, M., Zhu, W., Chen, W. and Wei, B. (2023) Causal Associations between Gut Microbiota and Psoriasis: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Dermatology and Therapy, 13, 2331-2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Yan, M., Ouyang, Y., Xiao, L., Ao, M., Gosau, M., Friedrich, R.E., et al. (2023) Correlations between Gut Microbiota and Lichen Planus: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Frontiers in Immunology, 14, Article 1235982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Chen, M., Che, Y., Liu, M., Xiao, X., Zhong, L., Zhao, S., et al. (2024) Genetic Insights into the Gut Microbiota and Risk of Facial Skin Aging: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Skin Research and Technology, 30, e13636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Shi, Y., Tao, Q., Qin, H., Li, Y. and Zheng, H. (2023) Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Urticaria: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, Article 1189484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Contassot, E. (2018) Vaccinating against Acne: Benefits and Potential Pitfalls. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 138, 2304-2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] França, K. (2020) Topical Probiotics in Dermatological Therapy and Skincare: A Concise Review. Dermatology and Therapy, 11, 71-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Davies, N.M., Holmes, M.V. and Davey Smith, G. (2018) Reading Mendelian Randomisation Studies: A Guide, Glossary, and Checklist for Clinicians. BMJ, 362, k601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Moitinho-Silva, L., Degenhardt, F., Rodriguez, E., Emmert, H., Juzenas, S., Möbus, L., et al. (2022) Host Genetic Factors Related to Innate Immunity, Environmental Sensing and Cellular Functions Are Associated with Human Skin Microbiota. Nature Communications, 13, Article No. 6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Mitchell, B.L., Saklatvala, J.R., Dand, N., Hagenbeek, F.A., Li, X., Min, J.L., et al. (2022) Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis Identifies 29 New Acne Susceptibility Loci. Nature Communications, 13, Article No. 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Burgess, S. and Thompson, S.G. (2011) Avoiding Bias from Weak Instruments in Mendelian Randomization Studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 755-764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Burgess, S., Foley, C.N., Allara, E., Staley, J.R. and Howson, J.M.M. (2020) A Robust and Efficient Method for Mendelian Randomization with Hundreds of Genetic Variants. Nature Communications, 11, Article No. 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Burgess, S. and Thompson, S.G. (2017) Interpreting Findings from Mendelian Randomization Using the MR-Egger Method. European Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 377-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P.C. and Burgess, S. (2016) Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genetic Epidemiology, 40, 304-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Long, Y., Tang, L., Zhou, Y., Zhao, S. and Zhu, H. (2023) Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Cancers: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Study. BMC Medicine, 21, Article No. 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Verbanck, M., Chen, C., Neale, B. and Do, R. (2018) Detection of Widespread Horizontal Pleiotropy in Causal Relationships Inferred from Mendelian Randomization between Complex Traits and Diseases. Nature Genetics, 50, 693-698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Storey, J.D. and Tibshirani, R. (2003) Statistical Significance for Genomewide Studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 9440-9445.
[24] Tomida, S., Nguyen, L., Chiu, B., Liu, J., Sodergren, E., Weinstock, G.M., et al. (2013) Pan-Genome and Comparative Genome Analyses of Propionibacterium Acnes Reveal Its Genomic Diversity in the Healthy and Diseased Human Skin Microbiome. mBio, 4, e00003-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]