辅助生殖助孕后稽留流产绒毛染色体核型异常与新鲜周期卵裂期胚和囊胚移植的相关性分析
Correlation Analysis Between Fresh Cycle Cleavage Stage Embryos and Blastocyst Transfer on Chromosomal Karyotype Abnormalities in Retained Miscarriage after Assisted Reproductive Technology
摘要: 目的:分析新鲜周期卵裂期胚和囊胚移植对体外受精/卵胞质内单精子注射(in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, IVF/ICSI)助孕后稽留流产绒毛染色体核型异常发生的影响。方法:纳入2020年1月至2024年1月期间于新疆佳音医院行IVF/ICSI助孕新鲜周期卵裂期胚和囊胚移植后稽留流产患者的临床数据及绒毛染色体拷贝数变异(copy number variations, CNVs)的检测结果。采用病例对照研究,根据流产组织绒毛染色体CNVs检测结果将数据分为两组:异常染色体核型组(n = 67)和正常染色体核型组(n = 69),比较两组患者的基线数据。应用单因素及多因素logistic回归调整女方年龄、女方BMI和基础FSH等混杂因素。结果:基线数据中,异常染色体核型组女方年龄[34.00 (32.00, 37.00)]、女方BMI [23.90 (22.27, 26.33)]和基础FSH [7.12 (6.06, 8.95)]高于正常染色体核型组女方年龄[32.00 (31.00, 34.00)]、女方BMI [22.86 (20.66, 24.92)]和基础FSH [6.31 (5.53, 7.91)],差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.049, 0.025, 0.028)。将女方年龄和女方BMI分层logistic回归分析差异均无统计学差异(均P > 0.05)。结论:新鲜周期卵裂期胚和囊胚移植对IVF/ICSI助孕稽留流产绒毛染色体核型异常无明显差异。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the impact of fresh cycle cleavage stage embryo and blastocyst transfer on the occurrence of chromosomal karyotype abnormalities in retained miscarriage following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Methods: Clinical data and results of chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) testing were collected from patients who underwent fresh cycle cleavage stage embryo and blastocyst transfer at Xinjiang Jiayin Hospital for IVF/ICSI-assisted pregnancy from January 2020 to January 2024 and experienced retained miscarriage. A case-control study was conducted, categorizing the data into two groups based on the CNVs testing results of the miscarriage tissue: abnormal karyotype group (n = 67) and normal karyotype group (n = 69), comparing the baseline data of the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was applied to adjust for confounding factors such as maternal age, maternal BMI, and baseline FSH. Results: In the baseline data, maternal age [34.00 (32.00, 37.00)], maternal BMI [23.90 (22.27, 26.33)], and baseline FSH [7.12 (6.06, 8.95)] in the abnormal karyotype group were higher than those in the normal karyotype group, with maternal age [32.00 (31.00, 34.00) years], maternal BMI [22.86 (20.66, 24.92)], and baseline FSH [6.31 (5.53, 7.91)], and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.049, 0.025, 0.028). No statistical differences were found in the stratified logistic regression analysis for age and maternal BMI (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the occurrence of chromosomal karyotype abnormalities in retained miscarriage after fresh cycle cleavage stage embryo and blastocyst transfer in IVF/ICSI-assisted pregnancies.
文章引用:曾晓艳, 丁巍, 李倩, 古再丽努尔·艾萨, 卢思含, 王玉平. 辅助生殖助孕后稽留流产绒毛染色体核型异常与新鲜周期卵裂期胚和囊胚移植的相关性分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(6): 413-420. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1561741

参考文献

[1] Hipp, H., Crawford, S., Kawwass, J.F., Chang, J., Kissin, D.M. and Jamieson, D.J. (2016) First Trimester Pregnancy Loss after Fresh and Frozen in Vitro Fertilization Cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 105, 722-728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Pylyp, L.Y., Spynenko, L.O., Verhoglyad, N.V., Mishenko, A.O., Mykytenko, D.O. and Zukin, V.D. (2017) Chromosomal Abnormalities in Products of Conception of First-Trimester Miscarriages Detected by Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis: A Review of 1000 Cases. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35, 265-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Zhao, L., Yang, H. and Liu, G. (2020) Relationship between Age at Menarche and Chromosome Numerical Abnormalities in Chorionic Villus among Missed Abortions: A Cross‐Sectional Study of 459 Women in China. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 46, 2582-2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Jurisicova, A. and Acton, B.M. (2004) Deadly Decisions: The Role of Genes Regulating Programmed Cell Death in Human Preimplantation Embryo Development. Reproduction, 128, 281-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Maheshwari, A., Hamilton, M. and Bhattacharya, S. (2016) Should We Be Promoting Embryo Transfer at Blastocyst Stage? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 32, 142-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kissin, D.M., Kulkarni, A.D., Mneimneh, A., Warner, L., Boulet, S.L., Crawford, S., et al. (2015) Embryo Transfer Practices and Multiple Births Resulting from Assisted Reproductive Technology: An Opportunity for Prevention. Fertility and Sterility, 103, 954-961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Cornelisse, S., Ramos, L., Arends, B., Brink-van der Vlugt, J.J., de Bruin, J.P., Curfs, M.H., et al. (2021) Comparing the Cumulative Live Birth Rate of Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfers between IVF Cycles: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Superiority Trial (the ToF Trial). BMJ Open, 11, e042395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 郭晓晓, 王新花, 袁赛赛, 等. 卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎移植妊娠结局的Meta分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2020, 29(6): 775-784.
[9] Hatırnaz, Ş. and Kanat Pektaş, M. (2017) Day 3 Embryo Transfer versus Day 5 Blastocyst Transfers: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 14, 82-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Glujovsky, D., Farquhar, C., Quinteiro Retamar, A.M., Alvarez Sedo, C.R. and Blake, D. (2016) Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 6, CD002118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Martins, W.P., Nastri, C.O., Rienzi, L., van der Poel, S.Z., Gracia, C.R. and Racowsky, C. (2016) Obstetrical and Perinatal Outcomes Following Blastocyst Transfer Compared to Cleavage Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Human Reproduction, 31, 2561-2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Martins, W.P., Nastri, C.O., Rienzi, L., et al. (2017) Blastocyst vs Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reproductive Outcomes. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 49, 583-591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Busnelli, A., Dallagiovanna, C., Reschini, M., Paffoni, A., Fedele, L. and Somigliana, E. (2019) Risk Factors for Monozygotic Twinning after in Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 111, 302-317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Alfarawati, S., Fragouli, E., Colls, P., Stevens, J., Gutiérrez-Mateo, C., Schoolcraft, W.B., et al. (2011) The Relationship between Blastocyst Morphology, Chromosomal Abnormality, and Embryo Gender. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 520-524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Staessen, C., Verpoest, W., Donoso, P., Haentjens, P., Van der Elst, J., Liebaers, I. and Devroey, P. (2008) Preimplantation Genetic Screening Does Not Improve Delivery Rate in Women under the Age of 36 Following Single-Embryo Transfer. Human Reproduction, 23, 2818-2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 吴靖雅, 张莹莹, 严茜, 等. 既往自然流产胚胎染色体异常者的囊胚染色体异常发生率[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2018, 38(5): 370-374.
[17] 王婕, 王福玲. 不同年龄组孕妇稽留流产绒毛染色体分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2019, 28(12): 931-932, 935.
[18] 姚婷婷, 郑瑛红, 李琰琼, 等. 稽留流产的临床特征及相关因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2023, 34(8): 76-82.
[19] 胡亚会. 单纯肥胖患者卵泡液外泌体miRNAs对卵母细胞及胚胎质量的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2023.
[20] Valckx, S.D.M., De Pauw, I., De Neubourg, D., Inion, I., Berth, M., Fransen, E., et al. (2012) BMI-Related Metabolic Composition of the Follicular Fluid of Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Treatment and the Consequences for Oocyte and Embryo Quality. Human Reproduction, 27, 3531-3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Jungheim, E.S., Macones, G.A., Odem, R.R., Patterson, B.W., Lanzendorf, S.E., Ratts, V.S., et al. (2011) Associations between Free Fatty Acids, Cumulus Oocyte Complex Morphology and Ovarian Function during in Vitro Fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 1970-1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Leary, C., Leese, H.J. and Sturmey, R.G. (2014) Human Embryos from Overweight and Obese Women Display Phenotypic and Metabolic Abnormalities. Human Reproduction, 30, 122-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Buratini, J., Dellaqua, T.T., Dal Canto, M., La Marca, A., Carone, D., Mignini Renzini, M., et al. (2021) The Putative Roles of FSH and AMH in the Regulation of Oocyte Developmental Competence: From Fertility Prognosis to Mechanisms Underlying Age-Related Subfertility. Human Reproduction Update, 28, 232-254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Bianchi, S., Macchiarelli, G., Micara, G., Linari, A., Boninsegna, C., Aragona, C., et al. (2015) Ultrastructural Markers of Quality Are Impaired in Human Metaphase II Aged Oocytes: A Comparison between Reproductive and in Vitro Aging. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32, 1343-1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Babariya, D., Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K. and Wells, D. (2017) The Incidence and Origin of Segmental Aneuploidy in Human Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos. Human Reproduction, 32, 2549-2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 杨明雪, 翟俊英, 钮红丽. 人类辅助生殖技术受孕的稽留流产患者绒毛组织染色体异常结果分析[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2024, 40(9): 1516-1520.
[27] 刘丽, 邸建永, 王媛媛, 等. 辅助生殖技术患者孕早期流产绒毛染色体异常分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(11): 868-870.
[28] 荆霞, 马天仲, 李云清, 等. 借助辅助生殖技术妊娠的不孕症早期流产患者与自然妊娠早期流产患者绒毛染色体异常核型比较[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(24): 27-30.
[29] 季玉娟, 郑爱燕, 丁洁, 等. 优化选择性卵裂期单胚胎移植策略的妊娠结局分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2022, 31(8): 1022-1029.
[30] 李菲, 师娟子, 薛侠, 等. 选择性单囊胚移植在高龄女性辅助生殖助孕中的应用及效果分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2022, 31(5): 632-637.