股权激励对企业绩效的影响——基于管理者短视主义的中介效应
The Impact of Equity Incentives on Corporate Performance—Mediating Role of Managerial Short-Termism
摘要: 本研究聚焦于2014年至2023年期间中国所有A股上市的非金融、非房地产公司,致力于探究股权激励对企业绩效的作用及其内在机理,采用多元回归分析和双向固定效应模型,通过实证分析,检验了股权激励、管理者短视主义与企业绩效这三者之间的关系。研究结果显示:股权激励与企业绩效之间存在着显著的正相关,即随着股权激励的实施,企业的经营绩效也会随之提高。此外,管理者短视主义在股权激励与企业绩效之间扮演着部分中介作用。具体而言,股权激励能够抑制管理者过度关注短期利益的倾向,促使其更多地关注企业的长期发展目标,从而提升整体企业绩效。研究还发现,股权激励在提高企业绩效的同时,有助于缓解管理者短视主义带来的负面影响,增强企业的持续竞争力。本文的结论为理解股权激励在提升企业绩效中的作用提供了新的视角,并为企业制定更加有效的激励机制提供了理论依据。
Abstract: This study focuses on all non-financial and non-real estate A-share listed companies in China from 2014 to 2023, aiming to explore the effect of equity incentives on corporate performance and its underlying mechanism. By employing multiple regression analysis and a two-way fixed effects model, this paper empirically examines the relationship among equity incentives, managerial short-termism, and corporate performance. The research findings reveal a significant positive correlation between equity incentives and corporate performance, indicating that the implementation of equity incentives leads to an improvement in business performance. Additionally, managerial short-termism plays a partial mediating role between equity incentives and corporate performance. Specifically, equity incentives can curb managers’ excessive focus on short-term interests, encouraging them to pay more attention to the long-term development goals of the enterprise, thereby enhancing overall corporate performance. The study also finds that equity incentives not only improve corporate performance but also help alleviate the negative impacts of managerial short-termism, strengthening the enterprise’s sustained competitiveness. The conclusions of this paper provide a new perspective for understanding the role of equity incentives in enhancing corporate performance and offer a theoretical basis for enterprises to formulate more effective incentive mechanisms.
文章引用:杨凤仪. 股权激励对企业绩效的影响——基于管理者短视主义的中介效应[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2025, 15(3): 200-210. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2025.153153

参考文献

[1] 胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?——基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 139-156+11+19-21.
[2] 倪艳, 胡燕. 股权激励强度对企业绩效的影响——以A股上市公司为例[J]. 江汉论坛, 2021(4): 17-27.
[3] Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Core, J. and Guay, W. (1999) The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 151-184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 陈文强, 贾生华. 股权激励、代理成本与企业绩效——基于双重委托代理问题的分析框架[J]. 当代经济科学, 2015, 37(2): 106-113+128.
[6] 王春雷, 黄庆成. 高管股权激励对企业绩效的影响研究——基于中介效应模型[J]. 会计之友, 2020(3): 89-96.
[7] 范晓旭. 高管股权激励、研发投入强度与企业绩效——以A股上市公司为例[J]. 商业会计, 2018(5): 33-37.
[8] 王秀芬, 徐小鹏. 高管股权激励、经营风险与企业绩效[J]. 会计之友, 2017(10): 84-89.
[9] Stein, J.C. (1988) Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 61-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Laverty, K.J. (1996) Economic “Short-Termism”: The Debate, the Unresolved Issues, and the Implications for Management Practice and Research. Academy of Management Review, 21, 825-860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984) Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Narayanan, M.P. (1985) Managerial Incentives for Short‐Term Results. The Journal of Finance, 40, 1469-1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 徐宁, 任天龙. 高管股权激励对民营中小企业成长的影响机理——基于双重代理成本中介效应的实证研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2014(4): 55-63.
[14] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004(5): 614-620.