特细砂混凝土干燥收缩性能分析
Analysis of Drying Shrinkage Performance of Ultra-Fine Sand Concrete
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2025.146146, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 付玉娇, 冯 伟:宁夏农垦建设有限公司,宁夏 银川;车佳玲:宁夏大学土木与水利工程学院,宁夏 银川
关键词: 特细砂混凝土干燥收缩特细砂替代率粉煤灰替代率 Ultra-Fine Sand Concrete Drying Shrinkage Replacement Rate of Ultra-Fine Sand Substitution Rate of Fly Ash
摘要: 以不同掺量的特细砂取代机制砂制备特细砂混凝土试件,分析不同水胶比下特细砂掺量与粉煤灰掺量对试件干燥收缩性能的影响。结果表明,特细砂混凝土干燥收缩率随着养护龄期的增加呈现先增加后趋于平稳的变化趋势,在45 d龄期时达到最大干缩率。特细砂混凝土干燥收缩率随特细砂替代率增加而增加,特细砂替代率为20%时,特细砂混凝土干燥收缩性能最好。掺量28%粉煤灰抑制混凝土干燥收缩效果优于掺量18%粉煤灰。水胶比0.34、粉煤灰替代率28%及特细砂替代率20%时,特细砂混凝土干燥收缩性能最好。
Abstract: Ultra-fine sand concrete specimens were prepared by replacing machine-made sand with different dosages of ultra-fine sand. The effects of the dosages of ultra-fine sand and fly ash on the drying shrinkage performance of the specimens were analyzed under different water cement ratios. The results showed that the drying shrinkage rate of ultra-fine sand concrete showed a trend of first increasing and then stabilizing with the increase of curing age, reaching the maximum drying shrinkage rate at 45 days of age. The drying shrinkage rate of ultra-fine sand concrete increases with the increase of ultra-fine sand replacement rate. When the ultra-fine sand replacement rate is 20%, the drying shrinkage performance of ultra-fine sand concrete is the best. The inhibitory effect of 28% fly ash on concrete drying shrinkage is better than that of 18% fly ash. When the water cement ratio is 0.34, the substitution rate of fly ash is 28%, and the substitution rate of ultra-fine sand is 20%, the drying shrinkage performance of ultra-fine sand concrete is the best.
文章引用:付玉娇, 冯伟, 车佳玲. 特细砂混凝土干燥收缩性能分析[J]. 土木工程, 2025, 14(6): 1369-1376. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2025.146146

参考文献

[1] 瞿尔仁, 杨木旺, 叶桂花, 等. 再生混凝土技术及其应用[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2003(6): 1183-1187.
[2] Maghfouri, M., Shafigh, P., Alimohammadi, V., Doroudi, Y. and Aslam, M. (2020) Appropriate Drying Shrinkage Prediction Models for Lightweight Concrete Containing Coarse Agro-Waste Aggregate. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, Article ID: 101148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 喻泽鑫, 李秋义, 苏敦磊. 再生混凝土自生收缩和干燥收缩性能研究进展[J]. 混凝土, 2022, 388(2): 6-9.
[4] 李家正, 石妍, 杨华全. 骨料品种对混凝土体积变形特性的影响研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2010, 32(6): 16-19.
[5] 刘海卿, 颜丙男. 不同骨料用量与尺寸对混凝土干缩性能影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2015, 34(1): 204-207.
[6] Yu, Y., Wang, P., Yu, Z., Yue, G., Wang, L., Guo, Y., et al. (2021) Study on the Effect of Recycled Coarse Aggregate on the Shrinkage Performance of Green Recycled Concrete. Sustainability, 13, Article 13200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 孙道胜, 李泽英, 刘开伟, 等. 再生粗骨料的形态及缺陷对再生混凝土干燥收缩和力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(11): 11027-11033, 11056.
[8] 何世钦, 高鹏飞, 白紫云, 等. 石粉对自密实混凝土收缩性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(10): 3428-3435.
[9] 廖巍崴, 汤胜, 窦加进, 等. 自密实混凝土室内干燥收缩性能预估[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(3): 521-524.
[10] 刘积丁. 自密实混凝土自生约束收缩下应力松弛性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 福州: 福州大学, 2017.
[11] Tam, C.M., Tam, V.W.Y. and Ng, K.M. (2012) Assessing Drying Shrinkage and Water Permeability of Reactive Powder Concrete Produced in Hong Kong. Construction and Building Materials, 26, 79-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Mermerdaş, K. and Arbili, M.M. (2015) Explicit Formulation of Drying and Autogenous Shrinkage of Concretes with Binary and Ternary Blends of Silica Fume and Fly Ash. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 371-379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Güneyisi, E., Gesoğlu, M. and Özbay, E. (2010) Strength and Drying Shrinkage Properties of Self-Compacting Concretes Incorporating Multi-System Blended Mineral Admixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 1878-1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 张恒春, 唐方宇, 季锡贤, 等. 超细矿物掺合料对高强混凝土干燥收缩影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2017, 36(7): 2514-2518.
[15] 段承刚, 孙永涛. 复掺高性能矿物掺合料对高强机制砂混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2296-2305.