互联网经济背景下AI精准营销的理论边界与伦理挑战研究
Research on the Theoretical Boundaries and Ethical Challenges of AI Precision Marketing in the Context of the Internet Economy
摘要: 在互联网经济中,AI精准营销凭借数据驱动大大提高了交易效率,却引发理论边界突破与伦理挑战。理论层面,算法异化颠覆传统人货关系,使“人找货”转向“货找人”,消费者主权被平台数据策略消解,数字生产资料被少数平台垄断私有,打破了传统经济学中消费者主导与生产资料所有制的理论框架。伦理层面,算法黑箱导致价格歧视、流量分配不均及搜索权重操控,造成交易公平坍塌,拼团砍价等手段将社交关系异化为营销工具,直播间“秒杀倒计时”等营销策略剥夺消费者认知与决策自主权。乱象的治理需从底层规则重塑入手,一方面借鉴欧盟数字监管法规,制定针对超大型平台的法律,规范其数据使用与市场竞争行为,另一方面借助技术赋能重构数据生产关系,建立用户主导的数据所有权与控制权机制,并构建数据贡献值分红机制,让用户共享数据要素红利。这需要多方力量共同发力,以公平的理念推动数字经济可持续发展。
Abstract: In the Internet economy, AI-powered precision marketing, driven by data, has significantly enhanced transaction efficiency. However, it has also triggered breakthroughs in theoretical boundaries and ethical challenges. At the theoretical level, the alienation of algorithms has subverted the traditional relationship between people and goods, shifting from “people looking for goods” to “goods finding people”. The sovereignty of consumers has been eroded by the data strategies of platforms, and digital means of production have been monopolized and privately owned by a few platforms, breaking the theoretical framework of consumer dominance and ownership of the means of production in traditional economics. At the ethical level, algorithmic black boxes lead to price discrimination, unequal distribution of traffic, and manipulation of search rankings, causing the collapse of transactional fairness. Methods such as group buying and bargain-cutting activities have alienated social relationships into marketing tools. Marketing strategies like the “seckill countdown” in live streaming rooms deprive consumers of their autonomy in cognition and decision-making. To address these chaotic phenomena, it is necessary to start from reshaping the underlying rules. On the one hand, drawing on the digital regulatory laws and regulations of the European Union, laws targeting super-large platforms should be formulated to regulate their data usage and market competition behaviors. On the other hand, with the empowerment of technology, the data production relations should be reconstructed, and a mechanism for users to dominate data ownership and control rights should be established. Additionally, a dividend mechanism based on data contribution values should be constructed to enable users to share the dividends of data factors. This requires the joint efforts of multiple parties, and promoting the sustainable development of the digital economy with the concept of fairness.
文章引用:郭娟. 互联网经济背景下AI精准营销的理论边界与伦理挑战研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(6): 876-882. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1461813

参考文献

[1] 焦豪, 王林栋, 王楠, 赫昭然. 数字平台生态系统中互补者产品策略对经营绩效的影响研究: 基于平台治理的调节效应[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 1-23.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20250417.1325.004.html, 2025-06-06.
[2] 张乐乐. 大数据“杀熟”之民事责任问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学法学院, 2022.
[3] 潘丽. 生成式人工智能的伦理问题研究综述——基于CiteSpace的文献计量与可视化分析[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 25(2): 57-68.
[4] 丁晓东. 论超大型互联网平台的法律规制[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2025, 43(1): 94-108.
[5] 鲁彦楷, 张立伟. 数字劳动的资本主义生产逻辑及其主体性异化[J]. 经济纵横, 2025(4): 46-55.
[6] 吴晶, 叶可可, 张晶. 面向WEB3.0数字资产的关键技术与产业化应用[C]//中国企业改革发展优秀成果2024 (第八届)下卷. 北京: 中国企业改革与发展研究会, 2025: 12.