电商物流中的异质双边竞标机制设计与效率优化
Design and Efficiency Optimization of Heterogeneous Bilateral Bidding Mechanism in E-Commerce Logistics
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1461831, PDF,   
作者: 龙凌艳:贵州大学管理学院,贵州 贵阳;孙 盈:贵州大学音乐学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 电子商务物流双边拍卖数字化交易资源配置优化E-Commerce Logistics Bilateral Auctions Digital Transactions Resource Allocation Optimization
摘要: 电子商务驱动的物流需求呈现碎片化、高频次与强时效性特征,传统货运模式因信息孤岛与局部寻优难以满足动态资源配置需求。针对货运市场因信息不对称、交易成本高及局部寻优导致的资源配置效率低下问题,本文提出一种基于货运网络节点的异质双边竞标交易机制。首先,通过解构货运市场,将异质货运标的按运距区间分层并实现同质化计量,基于大数据与智能算法的标准化交易单元设计:基于货物积载因数与运距区间划分,设计运量同质化计价模型,统一货运需求与供给的计量维度,降低交易复杂度。其次,改进McAfee双边拍卖机制,提出多单位异质标的匹配规则,通过供需双方密封竞标实现价格生成与自动匹配,并严格证明该机制满足激励相容、个体理性及预算平衡约束。仿真结果表明,在活跃市场中,交易者可通过真实报价获取绝大部分交易剩余(效率损失 ≤ 0.02),且交易成功率随报价方差降低显著提升(最高达98%),验证了机制在电商物流高波动场景下的鲁棒性。本文机制通过突破传统标价与议价模式的信息壁垒与效率瓶颈,为数字化物流平台规模化处理异质交易、优化资源配置提供了理论与技术支撑。
Abstract: E-commerce-driven logistics demand is characterized by fragmentation, high frequency and strong timeliness, and the traditional freight transport model is difficult to meet the dynamic resource allocation needs due to information silos and local optimization. In view of the inefficiency of resource allocation due to information asymmetry, high transaction cost and local optimization in the freight market, this paper proposes a heterogeneous bilateral bidding and trading mechanism based on freight network nodes. First, by deconstructing the freight market, the heterogeneous freight targets are stratified according to the distance interval and realize homogeneous measurement, based on the design of standardized trading units of big data and intelligent algorithms: based on the division of cargo accumulation factor and distance interval, the design of homogeneous pricing model of the freight volume, the unified freight demand and supply of measurement dimensions, and reduce the complexity of the transaction. Secondly, we improve McAfee bilateral auction mechanism, propose multi-unit heterogeneous bid matching rules, realize price generation and automatic matching through sealed bidding between supply and demand sides, and rigorously prove that the mechanism satisfies incentive compatibility, individual rationality and budget balance constraints. The simulation results show that in the active market, traders can obtain the majority of the transaction surplus through real quotes (efficiency loss ≤ 0.02), and the success rate of the transaction is significantly improved with the reduction of the quotes’ variance (up to 98%), which verifies the robustness of the mechanism in the high volatility scenario of e-commerce logistics. By breaking through the information barriers and efficiency bottlenecks of traditional bidding and bargaining models, the mechanism in this paper provides theoretical and technical support for digital logistics platforms to deal with heterogeneous transactions at scale and optimize resource allocation.
文章引用:龙凌艳, 孙盈. 电商物流中的异质双边竞标机制设计与效率优化[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(6): 1035-1046. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1461831

参考文献

[1] 戴宏. 我国公路货运物流服务定价机制研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2016(12): 74-76.
[2] 余兴源. 完善道路货运价格机制的路径选择[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2016(9): 69-72.
[3] 郁葱茏. 物流业全要素生产率及其影响因素分析[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2018, 35(5): 50-57.
[4] 郑鑫尧. 拍卖概览[M]. 北京: 立信会计出版社, 1998: 2-4.
[5] 周乐欣, 腾可, 吕凡. 平台型物流采购双向竞标交易模式创新研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019(4): 624-632.
[6] 满帮集团董事长兼首席执行官张晖: 数字化绿色化让物流更智慧[EB/OL].
http://www.chinawuliu.com.cn/zixun/202311/21/620743.shtml, 2025-05-11.
[7] Tully, S. (2000) The B2B Tool That Really Is Changing the World. Fortune, 141, 3-8.
[8] Cohn, L., Bardy. D. and Welch, D. (2000) B2B: The Hottest Net Bet Yet? BusinessWeek, 1, 36-37.
[9] 张季平, 骆温平. 物流平台技术与运营模式协同创新研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(2): 19-27
[10] Vickrey, W. (1961) Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16, 8-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Myerson, R. (1981) Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 58-73.
[12] 叶文, 詹文杰, 邹轶, 等. 在线增价拍卖中跳跃式报价的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017(4): 85-92.
[13] Mi, Z.Q. and Zhang, M. (2014) A VCG Mechanism Based Storage Allocation Strategy in Cloud Computing Environment. Journal of Communications, 9, 962-970.
[14] Zhu, Y.Q. and Wu, W.L. (2015) A Double-Auction-Based Mechanism to Stimulate Secondary Users for Cooperative Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64, 3770-3782.
[15] Xu, X., Ma, J. and Xie, X. (2014) Double Auction Mechanisms on Markovian Networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7032-7045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Lin, S.M. (2011) Using Optimized Support Vector Machine to Perform Satisfaction Analysis for Online Auction Logistic Service. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and Its Applications, 5, 167-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Kim, C. and Chang, W. (2011) Logistic Regression in Sealed-Bid Auctions with Multiple Rounds: Application in Korean Court Auction. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 3098-3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Kuyzu, G., Akyol, Ç.G., Ergun, Ö. and Savelsbergh, M. (2015) Bid Price Optimization for Truckload Carriers in Simultaneous Transportation Procurement Auctions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 73, 34-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Handoko, S.D. and Lau, H.C. (2016) Enabling Carrier Collaboration via Order Sharing Double Auction: A Singapore Urban Logistics Perspective. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 777-786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Ağralı, S., Tan, B. and Karaesmen, F. (2008) Modeling and Analysis of an Auction-Based Logistics Market. European Journal of Operational Research, 191, 272-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 宋娟娟, 刘伟. 双边市场理论视角下物流平台运营机制分析——以公路货运平台为例[J]. 中国流通经济, 2015, 29(10): 28-33.
[22] 周乐欣, 王先甲, 刘红芳. 区域物流中心专用资产投资和运营招投标机制[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(8): 1429-1439.
[23] 许垒, 卜祥智, 杨晓丽. 期权和固定承诺合同在货运业中的应用价值[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21(5): 357-365.
[24] 曾庆成, 胡祥培, 杨忠振. 集装箱码头泊位计划干扰恢复多目标模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2013, 27(2): 154-159.
[25] McAfee, R.P. (1992) A Dominant Strategy Double Auction. Journal of Economic Theory, 56, 434-450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Xu, S.X., Cheng, M. and Huang, G.Q. (2015) Efficient Intermodal Transportation Auctions for B2B E-Commerce Logistics with Transaction Costs. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 80, 322-337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Yang, K., Roca-Riu, M. and Menéndez, M. (2019) An Auction-Based Approach for Prebooked Urban Logistics Facilities. Omega, 89, 193-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Masoud, N., Lloret-Batlle, R. and Jayakrishnan, R. (2017) Using Bilateral Trading to Increase Ridership and User Permanence in Ridesharing Systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 102, 60-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Lai, M., Cai, X. and Hu, Q. (2017) An Iterative Auction for Carrier Collaboration in Truckload Pickup and Delivery. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 107, 60-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Nassiri-Mofakham, F., Ali Nematbakhsh, M., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N. and Kowalczyk, R. (2015) Bidding Strategy for Agents in Multi-Attribute Combinatorial Double Auction. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 3268-3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 周乐欣, 宋山梅, 李露. 大数据条件下物流采购竞标交易方式创新研究[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 36(2): 63-68.
[32] 赵光辉. 运输市场价格与成本测算——以中国十省市道路货运市场为例[J]. 中国流通经济, 2017, 31(4): 94-103.
[33] Verdonck, L., Caris, A., Ramaekers, K. and Janssens, G.K. (2013) Collaborative Logistics from the Perspective of Road Transportation Companies. Transport Reviews, 33, 700-719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Qin, H., Luo, M., Gao, X. and Lim, A. (2012) The Freight Allocation Problem with All-Units Quantity-Based Discount: A Heuristic Algorithm. Omega, 40, 415-423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef