辽河流域水质监测指标间的相关性分析及主成分分析
Analysis of Correlations and Principal Components among Water Quality Monitoring Indicators in the Liao River Basin
摘要: 为快速监测辽河流域水质,有效追踪并控制水质污染情况,本文选用辽河流域14个水质监测站2023年12期监测数据,分析常规水质指标与核心水质指标间的相关性。使用时间变化趋势检验和主成分综合指数效价评估各断面指标变化,确定核心指标关联度参数,且与常规水质类别进行方差分析。结果表明,不同检测站的核心指标与常规指标的关联度各异,主成分1 (浊度、高锰酸盐指数、总磷)反映悬浮物与有机污染负荷,主成分2 (电导率、氨氮、总氮)表征氮营养盐富集,主成分3 (pH、溶解氧)指示水体自净能力。流域污染呈现“上游物理性浑浊–中下游氮负荷突出–工业点源复合污染”的空间分异格局,建议优先实施通江口截污控磷、于家房河段脱氮工程及工业区酸碱度监管,以针对性改善水质。
Abstract: To enable rapid water quality monitoring and effective pollution tracking and control in the Liao River Basin, this study analyzed correlations between conventional and core water quality indicators using 2023 monitoring data from 14 stations across 12 monthly periods in the Liao River Basin. Temporal trend analysis and principal component comprehensive index evaluation were applied to assess cross-section parameter variations, determine core indicator correlation coefficients, and conduct ANOVA with conventional water quality categories. Results revealed station-specific variability in core-conventional indicator correlations, with Principal Component 1 (turbidity, permanganate index, total phosphorus) reflecting suspended solids and organic pollution loads, Principal Component 2 (conductivity, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen) characterizing nitrogen nutrient salt enrichment, and Principal Component 3 (pH, dissolved oxygen) indicating self-purification capacity of water body. Spatial differentiation displayed distinct pollution patterns: “physical turbidity dominant in upper reaches, elevated nitrogen loading in mid-lower reaches, and compound industrial pollution in point-source zones”. Targeted mitigation strategies include prioritizing phosphorus interception at Tongjiangkou, implementing nitrogen removal in Yujiafang river sections, and enhancing pH regulation in industrial areas.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
冯家成, 曹学康, 陶理, 等. 长江安徽段水质时空变化特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 长江科学院院报: 1-9. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1171.TV.20240914.1417.006.html, 2025-05-01.
|
|
[2]
|
张雯雯. 基于PCA分析的奉贤区地表水水质评价[J]. 陕西水利, 2025(2): 77-79.
|
|
[3]
|
周泽仪, 蒋少璐, 赵义勇, 等. 滇池流域捞鱼河湿地水质评价与时空变化特征[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2024, 46(3): 68-75.
|
|
[4]
|
闫淼, 陈峰. 广州市地下水水质评价方法研究——以主成分分析法和综合指数评价法为例[J]. 黑龙江环境通报, 2024, 37(9): 77-80.
|
|
[5]
|
王思依, 邹顺瑛, 孙文豪, 等. 基于水质标识指数与主成分分析法的复州河流域水质质量评价研究[J]. 干旱环境监测, 2024, 38(4): 172-178.
|
|
[6]
|
从俊强, 付祥元, 徐李军. 基于相关性及主成分分析的铸坯质量缺陷成因追溯方法[J]. 冶金自动化, 2024, 48(6): 48-56.
|
|
[7]
|
张贺玉, 杨莉园, 卢少勇, 等. 基于主成分分析的城市河流水质时空分布特征研究——以沧州市为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2024, 14(4): 1273-1283.
|
|
[8]
|
昌红, 刘达, 肖耿锋, 等. 广东省某大型水库水质时空变化特征综合评价[J]. 广东水利电力职业技术学院学报, 2025, 23(1): 21-27.
|
|
[9]
|
陈军, 胡高宇, 陈飞, 等. 温岭隘顽湾海水养殖区池塘水质状况调查与评价[J]. 浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 43(3): 260-267.
|
|
[10]
|
江泓, 杨红, 葛黄群. 黄冈市遗爱湖水质综合评价及富营养化分析[J]. 水利技术监督, 2025(3): 135-137+201+215.
|
|
[11]
|
严超群, 牛子航, 贾慧如, 等. 基于主成分分析的株洲市典型城市水体水质影响因子研究[J]. 广东蚕业, 2025, 59(1): 62-67.
|