|
[1]
|
Koza, J. (1994) Genetic Programming as a Means for Programming Computers by Natural Selection. Statistics and Computing, 4, 87-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Keijzer, M. (2003) Improving Symbolic Regression with Interval Arithmetic and Linear Scaling. In: Ryan, C., Soule, T., Keijzer, M., Tsang, E., Poli, R. and Costa, E., Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 70-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Vladislavleva, E.J., Smits, G.F. and den Hertog, D. (2009) Order of Nonlinearity as a Complexity Measure for Models Generated by Symbolic Regression via Pareto Genetic Programming. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13, 333-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
McConaghy, T. (2011) FFX: Fast, Scalable, Deterministic Symbolic Regression Technology. In: Riolo, R., Vladislavleva, E. and Moore, J., Eds., Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Springer, 235-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Schmidt, M. and Lipson, H. (2009) Symbolic Regression of Implicit Equations. In: Riolo, R., O’Reilly, UM. and McConaghy, T., Eds., Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Springer, 73-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Gupta, R., Srivastava, D., Sahu, M., Tiwari, S., Ambasta, R.K. and Kumar, P. (2021) Artificial Intelligence to Deep Learning: Machine Intelligence Approach for Drug Discovery. Molecular Diversity, 25, 1315-1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[7]
|
Angelis, D., Sofos, F. and Karakasidis, T.E. (2023) Artificial Intelligence in Physical Sciences: Symbolic Regression Trends and Perspectives. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 3845-3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[8]
|
Makke, N. and Chawla, S. (2024) Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, Article No. 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Rudin, C. (2019) Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 206-215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[10]
|
Lample, G. and Charton, F. (2019) Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematics. arXiv:191201412.
|
|
[11]
|
Biggio, L., Bendinelli, T., Lucchi, A., et al. (2020) A Seq2Seq Approach to Symbolic Regression. Proceedings of the Learning Meets Combinatorial Algorithms at NeurIPS2020.
|
|
[12]
|
Wu, M., Li, W., Yu, L., et al. (2023) Discovering Mathematical Expressions through DeepSymNet: A Classification-Based Symbolic Regression Framework. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
|
|
[13]
|
Udrescu, S. and Tegmark, M. (2020) AI Feynman: A Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regression. Science Advances, 6, eaay2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[14]
|
Udrescu, S.-M., Tan, A., Feng, J., et al. (2020) AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-Optimal Symbolic Regression Exploiting Graph Modularity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 4860-4871.
|
|
[15]
|
Kamienny, P.-A., D’ascoli, S., Lample, G., et al. (2022) End-to-End Symbolic Regression with Transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 10269-10281.
|
|
[16]
|
Lalande, F., Matsubara, Y., Chiba, N., et al. (2023) A Transformer Model for Symbolic Regression towards Scientific Discovery. arXiv:231204070.
|
|
[17]
|
Vastl, M., Kulhánek, J., Kubalík, J., Derner, E. and Babuška, R. (2024) SymFormer: End-to-End Symbolic Regression Using Transformer-Based Architecture. IEEE Access, 12, 37840-37849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[18]
|
Matsubara, Y., Chiba, N., Igarashi, R., et al. (2022) Rethinking Symbolic Regression Datasets and Benchmarks for Scientific Discovery. arXiv:220610540.
|