算法歧视视角下网络营销的公平竞争规制——以“大数据杀熟”与“竞价排名”为对象
Regulation of Fair Competition in Online Marketing from the Perspective of Algorithmic Discrimination—Focusing on “Big Data Price Discrimination” and “Paid Placement”
摘要: 在数字经济浪潮下,算法于网络营销中广泛应用,“大数据杀熟”与“竞价排名”等算法歧视问题却接踵而至,严重冲击公平竞争秩序,损害消费者权益。本研究融合法学与网络营销学理论方法,深入剖析算法歧视。从技术和法律层面解构其概念,揭示算法偏见和算法不平等的双重维度及不同规制逻辑。以“大数据杀熟”和“竞价排名”为典型场景,分析其法律属性、竞争危害。针对现行法律规制在概念边界、规范供给、司法实践方面的困境,构建涵盖事前预防、事中干预、事后救济的分层规制体系。研究旨在为算法歧视行为规制提供可行法律路径,推动数字经济领域公平竞争,同时展望未来在算法伦理法律化、跨学科研究及国际规则制定等方向的发展。
Abstract: In the wave of the digital economy, algorithms are widely used in online marketing. However, algorithmic discrimination issues such as “big data price discrimination” and “paid placement” have emerged one after another, severely impacting the fair competition order and harming consumers’ rights and interests. This study integrates the theoretical methods of law and online marketing to deeply analyze algorithmic discrimination. It deconstructs its concept from technical and legal perspectives, reveals the dual dimensions of algorithmic bias and algorithmic inequality and their different regulatory logics. Taking “big data price discrimination” and “paid placement” as typical scenarios, it analyzes their legal nature and competitive harms. In response to the dilemmas in the current legal regulation regarding concept boundaries, normative supply, and judicial practice, a hierarchical regulatory system covering ex-ante prevention, in-process intervention, and ex-post relief is constructed. The research aims to provide a feasible legal path for regulating algorithmic discrimination behaviors, promote fair competition in the digital economy, and simultaneously look ahead to future developments in the legalization of algorithmic ethics, interdisciplinary research, and international rule-making.
文章引用:蔡亚丽. 算法歧视视角下网络营销的公平竞争规制——以“大数据杀熟”与“竞价排名”为对象[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(6): 1704-1710. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1461916

参考文献

[1] 张璐. 算法决策系统公平性的事实逻辑与法律审视[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 45(6): 86-95.
[2] 赵丹阳. 论算法价格歧视下消费者权益保护的构建路径[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(11): 81-87.
[3] 韩旭至. 数据确权的困境及破解之道[J]. 东方法学, 2020(1): 97-107.
[4] 李志颖. 算法歧视的两副面孔及其法律规制[J]. 交大法学, 2024(1): 148-161.
[5] 廖建凯. “大数据杀熟”法律规制的困境与出路: 从消费者的权利保护到经营者算法权力治理[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2020, 22(1): 70-82.
[6] 何昊洋. 大数据杀熟背后的平台私权力及其法律矫正[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 29(6): 220-232.
[7] 许光耀. 大数据杀熟行为的反垄断法调整方法[J]. 政治与法律, 2024(4): 17-29.
[8] 刘权. 论个人信息处理的合法、正当、必要原则[J]. 法学家, 2021(5): 1-15, 191.
[9] 沈伟, 陈徐安黎. 反垄断法视角下合理数据交易价格的形成机制——基于供需与价值的分析[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 27(2): 98-108, 148.
[10] 孔豪. 大数据时代算法价格歧视行为的法律规制[J]. 中阿科技论坛(中英文), 2023(11): 153-157.
[11] 刘友华. 算法偏见及其规制路径研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 55-66.