电商平台协同下废旧电池回收动态博弈与营销成本分担机制分析
Analysis of Dynamic Game and Marketing Costs Sharing Mechanism for Waste Battery Recycling under E-Commerce Platform Collaboration
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1461940, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王太飞, 杨彦龙*:贵州大学数学与统计学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 废旧电池回收微分博弈成本分担机制Waste Battery Recycling Differential Game Cost-Sharing Mechanism
摘要: 随着新能源汽车产业的快速发展,动力电池规模化退役带来的环境与经济挑战日益凸显。本文基于微分博弈理论,构建新能源汽车企业联合电商平台零售商的废旧电池回收动态博弈模型,探讨了各自决策与营销成本分担决策两种情境下的均衡策略。通过数值仿真与参数敏感性分析发现:引入营销成本分担机制能显著提升废旧电池回收效率,但新能源汽车企业的最优成本分担比例需根据市场动态优化。分析结果表明,新能源汽车企业与电商平台零售商通过建立动态协同机制,实现个体收益增长,通过线上废旧电池回收渠道创新,形成了新能源汽车企业、电商平台零售商与电商平台三方协同发展的良性机制,为废旧电池回收的发展提供了新的实现路径。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the new energy vehicle (NEV) industry, the environmental and economic challenges posed by large-scale decommissioning of power batteries have become increasingly prominent. Based on differential game theory, this paper constructs a dynamic game model for waste battery recycling through the collaboration between the NEV enterprise and the e-commerce platform retailer, investigating equilibrium strategies under two scenarios: independent decision-making and marketing cost-sharing decisions. Numerical simulations and parameter sensitivity analysis reveal that implementing a marketing cost-sharing mechanism can significantly enhance the efficiency of waste battery recycling. However, the optimal cost-sharing ratio for the NEV enterprise requires dynamic market-based optimization. The findings demonstrate that through establishing a dynamic coordination mechanism, the NEV enterprise and the e-commerce platform retailer achieve individual profit growth and create a tripartite synergistic development model involving NEV enterprises, e-commerce platform retailers, and the e-commerce platforms themselves. This innovative online recycling channel mechanism provides a novel implementation pathway for waste battery recycling development.
文章引用:王太飞, 杨彦龙. 电商平台协同下废旧电池回收动态博弈与营销成本分担机制分析[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(6): 1912-1923. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1461940

参考文献

[1] Sun, Q., Chen, H., Long, R., Li, Q. and Huang, H. (2022) Comparative Evaluation for Recycling Waste Power Batteries with Different Collection Modes Based on Stackelberg Game. Journal of Environmental Management, 312, Article ID: 114892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Yi, J., Liao, J., Bai, T., Wang, B., Yangzom, C., Ahmed, Z., et al. (2022) Battery Wastewater Induces Nephrotoxicity via Disordering the Mitochondrial Dynamics. Chemosphere, 303, Article ID: 135018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Haefliger, P., Mathieu-Nolf, M., Lociciro, S., Ndiaye, C., Coly, M., Diouf, A., et al. (2009) Mass Lead Intoxication from Informal Used Lead-Acid Battery Recycling in Dakar, Senegal. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117, 1535-1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 冯章伟. 政府生产或回收补贴情境下新能源电动汽车动力电池运营决策研究[J]. 物流技术, 2025, 44(4): 25-36.
[5] Chen, J., Zhang, W., Gong, B., Zhang, X. and Li, H. (2022) Optimal Policy for the Recycling of Electric Vehicle Retired Power Batteries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, Article ID: 121930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Zhang, B. and Song, H. (2023) Collaborative Decision-Making Based on Effort Level: Power Battery Recycling Alliance. Procedia Computer Science, 221, 1155-1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Gu, H., Liu, Z. and Qing, Q. (2017) Optimal Electric Vehicle Production Strategy under Subsidy and Battery Recycling. Energy Policy, 109, 579-589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Xing, P. and Wang, M. (2025) The Interplay of Recycling Channel Selection and Blockchain Adoption in the New Energy Vehicle Supply Chain under the Government Reward-Penalty Scheme. Journal of Cleaner Production, 487, Article ID: 144384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 陈锶仪, 邱文畅, 黄子凯. 新能源汽车废旧锂电池回收平台设计[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2024(21): 93-95.
[10] 朱俊杰. 公平关切下动力电池闭环供应链的回收及补贴策略研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨理工大学, 2024.
[11] 刘磊. 一种汽车电池检测及回收系统[J]. 科技与创新, 2022(15): 54-57.
[12] He, Y., Xu, Q., Xu, B. and Wu, P. (2016) Supply Chain Coordination in Quality Improvement with Reference Effects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67, 1158-1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Kopalle, P.K. and Winer, R.S. (1996) A Dynamic Model of Reference Price and Expected Quality. Marketing Letters, 7, 41-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Luhta, I. and Virtanen, I. (1996) Non-linear Advertising Capital Model with Time Delayed Feedback between Advertising and Stock of Goodwill. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 7, 2083-2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zhang, W., Shu, C., Chen, B. and Liu, H. (2024) Research on Digital Transformation Strategy of the Energy Industry Based on Differential Game under the Dual-Carbon Background in China. Science of the Total Environment, 906, Article ID: 167297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Yi, Y., Fu, A., Li, Y. and Zhang, A. (2024) Battery Recycling and Coordination in Information Leakage Prevention under Blockchain Technology in a New Energy Vehicles Supply Chain. Energy Economics, 139, Article ID: 107862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Xu, S. and Han, C. (2019) Study on Basin Ecological Compensation Mechanism Based on Differential Game Theory. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 27, 199-207.
[18] Zhao, C., Ding, J., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. and Sun, H. (2025) Bilateral Cooperation or Complete Autonomy? Research on the Trade-In of NEV Battery Using a Differential Game with Delay Effect. Energy for Sustainable Development, 85, Article ID: 101644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef