政府审计介入下非国有金融机构三方博弈的行为抑制机制与政策启示
Behavioral Inhibition Mechanisms and Policy Implications of the Tripartite Game of Non-State Financial Institutions under Government Audit Intervention
摘要: 为防止非国有金融机构与内部审计部门和社会审计机构的合谋、舞弊等行为。本文基于博弈理论,分析信息不对称条件下的非国有金融机构舞弊行为,构建三方收益矩阵模型,并计算其纳什均衡解,将政府审计作为变量,对比引入政府审计和未引入政府审计时的博弈过程,通过分析得出:政府审计机关能够有效遏制非国有金融机构的舞弊行为,降低内部审计部门和社会审计机构的合谋概率。
Abstract: In order to prevent non-state-owned financial institutions from collusion and fraud with internal audit departments and social audit institutions, this paper analyzes the fraudulent behavior of non-state-owned financial institutions under the condition of information asymmetry based on game theory, constructs the tripartite benefit matrix model, and calculates its Nash equilibrium solution, takes the government audit as a variable, and compares the game process between the introduction of the government audit and the introduction of the government audit, and through the analysis, it is concluded that: the government audit authority can effectively curb the fraudulent behavior of non-state financial institutions, and reduce the probability of collusion of the internal audit department and social audit institutions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
审计署金融审计司课题组, 袁野, 吕劲松, 等. 审计机关在维护国家金融安全方面发挥作用的机制与路径[J]. 审计研究, 2010(1): 18-22.
|
|
[2]
|
王永海, 章涛. 金融创新趋势下金融审计监督体系构建[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2014(4): 66-72.
|
|
[3]
|
巩凤, 周云龙. 基于协同理论的国家审计、内部审计、社会审计的协作研究[J]. 中国内部审计, 2021(7): 79-84.
|
|
[4]
|
刘家义. 关于我国金融审计的思考[J]. 审计研究, 2002(5): 3-8.
|
|
[5]
|
刘亮. 金融审计: 更具独立性和综合性的金融监管[J]. 中国金融家, 2005(5): 97-98.
|
|
[6]
|
张群. 金融审计的缺陷及其特征[J]. 价格月刊, 2003(9): 28-29.
|
|
[7]
|
曹玉俊. 审计独立性影响因素的实证研究[J]. 审计研究, 2000(4): 39-51.
|
|
[8]
|
Fellingham, J.C. and Newman, D.P. (1985) Strategic Considerations in Auditing. The Accounting Review, 60, 634-650.
|
|
[9]
|
Matsumura, E.M. and Tucker, R.R. (1992) Fraud Detection: A Theoretical Foundation. The Accounting Review, 67, 753-782.
|
|
[10]
|
姚海鑫, 尹波, 李正. 关于上市公司会计监管的不完全信息博弈分析[J]. 会计研究, 2003(5): 43-45.
|
|
[11]
|
张金松, 陈国辉. 注册会计师与上市公司财务舞弊博弈的审计收费——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 财经问题研究, 2011(2): 114-123.
|