全球技术贸易中标准必要专利FRAND原则的跨境适用困境与协同优化路径
The Cross-Border Application Dilemma and Synergistic Optimization Path of FRAND Principles for Standard Essential Patents in Global Technology Trade
摘要: 在全球技术贸易蓬勃发展的背景下,跨境企业围绕标准必要专利(Standard Essential Patents, SEP)许可谈判中的FRAND (公平、合理、无歧视)原则产生诸多争议,严重影响技术跨境传播与企业国际竞争力。本文通过深入剖析FRAND原则在跨境贸易中的程序与实体争议,聚焦许可费确定、善意协商及纠纷解决等跨境难题,通过对比不同司法辖区的实践差异,提出构建跨境多元纠纷解决机制、细化FRAND规则及保护跨境中小企业的针对性策略,旨在为跨境企业突破困境提供理论与实践指引,促进全球技术贸易的公平有序发展。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the vigorous development of global technology trade, cross-border enterprises have encountered numerous disputes over the FRAND (Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory) principle in the licensing negotiations of standard-essential patents (SEPs), which has seriously affected the cross-border dissemination of technology and the international competitiveness of enterprises. This paper delves deeply into the procedural and substantive disputes of the FRAND principle in cross-border trade, focusing on cross-border challenges such as the determination of licensing fees, good faith negotiations, and dispute resolution. By comparing the practical differences in various judicial jurisdictions, it proposes targeted strategies such as building a cross-border multi-dispute resolution mechanism, refining FRAND rules, and protecting cross-border small and medium-sized enterprises. The aim is to provide theoretical and practical guidance for cross-border enterprises to break through the predicament and promote the fair and orderly development of global technology trade.
文章引用:张浩然. 全球技术贸易中标准必要专利FRAND原则的跨境适用困境与协同优化路径[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(6): 2112-2119. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1461967

参考文献

[1] 崔国斌. 标准必要专利权人选择许可环节的自由[J]. 知识产权, 2024(7): 58-84.
[2] 张玉蓉, 吴文飞. 标准必要专利FRAND许可费确定的影响因素实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 146-155.
[3] 谭宇航. 企业参与标准必要专利许可谈判指引[J]. 电子知识产权, 2023(8): 91-105.
[4] 耿邦. 欧盟标准必要专利治理新模式探析[J]. 电子知识产权, 2025(1): 34-44.
[5] 张煜召. FRAND承诺法律性质探讨——基于类型化与法律适用的分析[J]. 北大知识产权评论, 2023(00): 88-109.
[6] 郑伦幸. 论FRAND承诺下标准必要专利许可费的确定方法[J]. 法学, 2022(5): 146-158.
[7] 芮松艳. 标准必要专利案件中FRAND费率的确定[J]. 政法论坛, 2024, 42(6): 108-117.
[8] 马一德. 技术标准之许可定价规则的“非国家化”——以可比许可法为中心[J]. 法学研究, 2022, 44(3): 103-124.
[9] 刘影. 标准必要专利许可费率的计算: 理念、原则与方法[J]. 清华法学, 2022, 16(4): 148-167.
[10] 纪正坦. 标准必要专利禁令滥用的反垄断规制与中国省思[J]. 国际经济法学刊, 2025(1): 144-156.
[11] 张鹏. 跨境知识产权侵权纠纷的民事诉讼管辖规则研究[J]. 知识产权, 2022, 32(1): 14-35.
[12] 郑休休, 刘青. 数字经济产业领域的标准必要专利国际布局对比与分析[J]. 国际贸易, 2022(6): 71-80+88.
[13] 宁立志, 龚涛. 标准必要专利全球费率裁判: 实践、争议与对策[J]. 北方法学, 2022, 16(3): 38-52.
[14] 张俊艳, 杨沫涵, 王迪, 等. 数字经济时代标准必要专利许可三方演化博弈研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(2): 268-279.
[15] 蒋华胜. 标准必要专利FRAND原则的规范解释与司法裁判研究[J]. 法律适用, 2023(7): 123-137.
[16] 管超. 中小企业标准必要专利许可谈判应对策略研究[J]. 标准科学, 2024(11): 70-74+86.