APEC成员国技术进步与碳排放分类研究与启示
Research and Implications on the Technological Progress and Carbon Emissions Classification of APEC Member Countries
摘要: 全球气候变化加剧、碳排放问题成为国际焦点,为探究技术进步在不同经济发展阶段国家碳减排中的作用机制,寻求有效的碳减排路径,本文以APEC组织中的17个国家2005~2022年的有关面板数据为基础,运用多种回归模型深入分析不同经济发展阶段国家技术进步对人均碳排放量的影响:从整体看,通电率、专利申请量等变量对人均碳排放有正向影响,ICT产品出口等变量则呈负向影响,其中人均GDP和人口密度的作用最为突出。分国家类型来看,高等收入国家中,通电率、高科技出口等变量显著正向影响人均碳排放;中高等收入国家里,通信技术产品出口、专利申请量等对人均碳排放的正向影响显著增强;中低等收入国家中,通信技术产品出口占比、移动网络用户占比呈正向影响,人均GDP却呈负向影响;中国的移动网络用户占比和人口密度对人均碳排放呈正向影响。最后基于研究结果,对各收入类型成员国制定差异化碳减排政策、推动全球碳减排进程提出相关建议。
Abstract: With the intensification of global climate change, the issue of carbon emissions has become an international focus. In order to explore the mechanism of technological progress in carbon emission reduction for countries at different stages of economic development and seek effective paths for carbon emission reduction, this paper, based on the relevant panel data of 17 countries within the APEC from 2005 to 2022, uses a variety of regression models to deeply analyze the impact of technological progress on per capita carbon emissions in countries at different economic development stages. Overall, variables such as the electricity access rate and the number of patent applications have a positive effect on per capita carbon emissions, while variables such as the export of ICT products have a negative effect. Among them, per capita GDP and population density play the most prominent roles. In terms of different types of countries, in high-income countries, variables such as the electricity access rate and high-tech exports have a significant positive impact on per capita carbon emissions. In upper-middle-income countries, the positive effects of variables such as the export of communication technology products and the number of patent applications on per capita carbon emissions are significantly enhanced. In lower-middle-income countries, the proportion of exports of communication technology products and mobile network users has a positive effect, while per capita GDP has a negative effect. In China, the proportion of mobile network users and the population density have a positive effect on per capita carbon emissions. Finally, based on the research results, relevant suggestions are put forward for member countries of different income types to formulate differentiated carbon emission reduction policies and to promote the global carbon emission reduction process.
文章引用:李雅楠, 魏力蛟. APEC成员国技术进步与碳排放分类研究与启示[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(6): 233-246. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.146493

参考文献

[1] Gao, P., Wang, Y., Zou, Y., Su, X., Che, X. and Yang, X. (2022) Green Technology Innovation and Carbon Emissions Nexus in China: Does Industrial Structure Upgrading Matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 951172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 吴康, 耿一睿, 郭涛. 城市群绿色技术创新对碳排放的影响——基于人力资本的调节效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(9): 2121-2139.
[3] 孙振清, 刘保留, 李欢欢. 产业结构调整、技术创新与区域碳减排——基于地区面板数据的实证研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2020(3): 101-108.
[4] Ben Lahouel, B., Taleb, L., Ben Zaied, Y. and Managi, S. (2021) Does ICT Change the Relationship between Total Factor Productivity and CO2 Emissions? Evidence Based on a Nonlinear Model. Energy Economics, 101, Article 105406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Bilal, A., Li, X., Zhu, N., Sharma, R. and Jahanger, A. (2021) Green Technology Innovation, Globalization, and CO2 Emissions: Recent Insights from the OBOR Economies. Sustainability, 14, Article 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] You, Z., Li, L. and Waqas, M. (2024) How Do Information and Communication Technology, Human Capital and Renewable Energy Affect CO2 Emission: New Insights from BRI Countries. Heliyon, 10, e26481.
[7] 邵帅, 范美婷, 杨莉莉. 经济结构调整、绿色技术进步与中国低碳转型发展——基于总体技术前沿和空间溢出效应视角的经验考察[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(2): 46-69+4-10.
[8] 李晓钟, 张小红. 互联网、技术进步与中国碳排放强度——基于扩展STIRPAT模型的实证分析[J]. 杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 17(6): 1-8+16.
[9] 胡熠, 靳曙畅. 数字技术助力“双碳”目标实现: 理论机制与实践路径[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(6): 111-118.
[10] Ganda, F. (2019) The Impact of Innovation and Technology Investments on Carbon Emissions in Selected Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 469-483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Li, M.Q. and Wang, Q. (2017) Will Technology Advances Alleviate Climate Change? Dual Effects of Technology Change on Aggregate Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Energy for Sustainable Development, 41, 61-68, [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Du, J.G., Ali, K., Alnori, F., et al. (2022) The Nexus of Financial Development, Technological Innovation, Institutional Quality, and Environmental Quality: Evidence from OECD Economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 58179-58200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 杨亦民, 王梓龙, 邓旭辉. 环境规制、技术创新与碳排放回弹效应——基于中国工业数据的实证检验[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2024(3): 135-144.
[14] 周雪琼. 新质生产力、颠覆性技术创新与碳排放绩效[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2024(11): 1-6.
[15] 李新安, 李慧. 外资引入、技术进步偏向影响了制造业的碳排放吗?——来自我国27个制造行业面板数据模型的实证检验[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(1): 159-170.
[16] 胡灵珊, 熊萍萍. 绿色技术创新如何助推制造业企业低碳转型——基于京津冀地区环境规制的中介效应检验[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(12): 63-70.
[17] 孙丽文, 李翼凡, 任相伟. 产业结构升级、技术创新与碳排放——一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 技术经济, 2020, 39(6): 1-9.
[18] 杜欣. 数字经济促进碳减排的机制与效应——基于绿色技术进步视角的经验考察[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(19): 22-32.
[19] 刘鹏飞, 韩晓琳. 数字技术发展对区域碳排放的影响效应及其作用机制——以长江经济带为例[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(4): 26-35.
[20] 张珺倩, 郑永扣. 数字化转型能减少企业碳排放吗?——来自中国上市公司的证据[J/OL]. 工程管理科技前沿, 1-13.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/34.1013.N.20241128.0948.006.html, 2024-12-25.
[21] 陈晓, 张鑫奥, 王育宝. 数字技术创新赋能城市低碳转型路径机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(23): 41-51.
[22] 易子榆, 魏龙, 王磊. 数字产业技术发展对碳排放强度的影响效应研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2022, 38(4): 22-37.