基于Vlasov地基和Timoshenko梁耦合模型的盾构掘进诱发既有隧道非线性变形解析解
Analytical Solution of Nonlinear Deformation Induced by Shield Tunneling Based on Vlasov Foundation and Timoshenko Beam Coupling Model in Existing Tunnels
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.146503, PDF,   
作者: 李嘉轩:上海理工大学环境与建筑学院,上海
关键词: 盾构隧道Vlasov地基Timoshenk梁非线性变形Shield Tunnel Vlasov Foundation Timoshenko Beam Nonlinear Deformation
摘要: 在工程实践中,盾构隧道施工诱发既有隧道变形脱空后,将会产生危及其结构安全的严重问题。基于Vlasov地基和Timoshenko梁耦合模型,构建了考虑既有隧道–土体界面脱空影响的盾构穿越既有隧道响应解析解。首先,采用Loganathan和Polous公式计算盾构开挖诱发的土体自由位移场,并将既有隧道看作置于Vlasov双参数地基上的具有恒定截面的Timoshenko梁模型。然后,根据隧道连续条件建立隧道位移控制方程,通过有限差分法求解隧道纵向变形,建立脱空判断条件,带入线弹性解求解考虑脱空发生的解析解。最后,将本文解析解与三组工程实测数据进行对比验证,取得了较好的一致性。此外,考虑地层损失率、地基压缩参数、地基剪切参数等因素进行敏感性分析。结果表明,考虑脱空作用的理论解更为符合实际,不考虑脱空所得隧道位移结果偏小;地基压缩参数和地基剪切参数对既有隧道–土体界面脱空行为具有显著影响;当地基剪切参数越大,既有隧道–土体界面更易脱空,产生更大的脱空范围;地基压缩参数越小,既有隧道沉降越大,既有隧道–土体界面越容易脱空。
Abstract: In engineering practice, shield tunnel construction can induce deformation and cavitation in existing tunnels, which can pose serious problems that threaten their structural safety. Firstly, the Loganathan and Polous formulae are employed to calculate the free soil displacement field induced by shield excavation. The existing tunnel is considered as a Timoshenko beam model with constant cross-section placed on Vlasov two-parameter foundation. Subsequently, the tunnel displacement control equations are established in accordance with the tunnel continuity condition. The longitudinal deformation of the tunnel is then solved by the finite difference method in order to establish the judgement condition of dehollowing. This is subsequently brought into the linear elastic solution in order to solve the analytical solution, taking into account the occurrence of dehollowing. Finally, the analytical solution presented in this paper is compared and verified with three groups of engineering measured data, and a satisfactory level of agreement is achieved. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses is conducted, taking into account the rate of formation loss, foundation compression parameters, foundation shear parameters. The results show that the theoretical solution considering the caving effect is more in line with the reality, while the tunnel displacement result obtained without considering caving is smaller. The compression parameters of the foundation and the shear parameters of the foundation have a significant influence on the voids behavior of the existing tunnel-soil interface. When the shear parameters of the foundation are larger, the existing tunnel-soil interface is more likely to voids, resulting in a larger voids range. The smaller the compression parameters of the foundation are, the greater the settlement of the existing tunnel will be, and the more likely the interface between the existing tunnel and the soil will be to voids.
文章引用:李嘉轩. 基于Vlasov地基和Timoshenko梁耦合模型的盾构掘进诱发既有隧道非线性变形解析解[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(6): 353-369. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.146503

参考文献

[1] 应宏伟, 姚言, 王奎华, 等. 双线平行顶管上跨地铁盾构隧道施工环境影响实测分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2023, 57(12): 1639-1647.
[2] 姜海波, 狄宏规, 周顺华. 旋喷加固淤泥层近距离交叠隧道施工扰动分析[J]. 公路, 2023, 68(1): 407-416.
[3] 邓声君, 何杨, 陈浩林, 等. 复杂环境软土地层盾构隧道推进实时动态仿真及变形预测研究——以苏州地铁S1号线盾构区间为例[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2022, 42(12): 2024-2035.
[4] 黄大维, 石海斌, 徐长节, 等. 盾构施工控制对刀盘扭矩及地表沉降影响试验研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2022, 44(11): 154-160.
[5] 罗维平, 袁大军, 金大龙, 等. 富水砂层盾构开挖面支护压力与地层变形关系离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 345-354.
[6] 魏纲, 赵得乾麟. 类矩形盾构穿越既有隧道引起土体沉降的模型试验研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2023, 20(1): 222-232.
[7] 张佩, 刘泽昊, 齐吉琳, 等. 卵石倾角对砂卵石地层隧道开挖影响的细观力学研究[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(10): 48-60.
[8] 李然, 陈平, 张顶立, 等. 大断面三孔小净距隧道围岩稳定性数值研究及工程实践[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(11): 83-95.
[9] 张治国, 张孟喜, 王卫东. 基坑开挖对临近地铁隧道影响的两阶段分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(7): 2085-2092.
[10] 周泽林, 陈寿根, 张海生, 等. 明挖卸荷对下卧地铁双洞隧道变形影响的计算方法研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2016, 38(9): 109-117.
[11] 宗翔. 基坑开挖卸载引起下卧已建隧道的纵向变形研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(S2): 571-577.
[12] Liang, R., Xia, T., Huang, M. and Lin, C. (2017) Simplified Analytical Method for Evaluating the Effects of Adjacent Excavation on Shield Tunnel Considering the Shearing Effect. Computers and Geotechnics, 81, 167-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 张治国, 黄茂松, 王卫东. 层状地基中隧道开挖对临近既有隧道影响分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(4): 600-608.
[14] 魏纲, 赵城丽. 基坑开挖引起邻近既有地铁隧道位移计算的研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018, 55(1): 124-132.
[15] Lin, C., Zheng, J., Ye, Y., Nadim, F., Liu, Z., Zhao, C., et al. (2024) Analytical Solution for Tunnelling-Induced Response of an Overlying Pipeline Considering Gap Formation. Underground Space, 15, 298-311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 程霖. 地铁隧道开挖引起地下管线变形的理论分析和试验研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.
[17] 杨成永, 董烨, 程霖, 等. 穿越施工中管线与土层共同变形规律分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2020, 37(1): 93-100.
[18] 王霆, 罗富荣, 刘维宁, 等. 地铁车站洞桩法施工引起的地表沉降和邻近柔性接头管道变形研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(2): 155-161.
[19] 付大喜, 杨明辉, 郑彬彬. 浅埋隧道开挖诱发上覆管道管底脱开范围求解及判定[J]. 工程力学, 2025, 42(6): 117-125.
[20] Loganathan, N. and Poulos, H.G. (1998) Analytical Prediction for Tunneling-Induced Ground Movements in Clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124, 846-856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Gan, X., Yu, J., Gong, X. and Zhu, M. (2020) Characteristics and Countermeasures of Tunnel Heave Due to Large-Diameter Shield Tunneling Underneath. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 34, Article 04019081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 金大龙. 盾构隧道群下穿既有地铁运营隧道变形机理及控制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018.
[23] Li, P., Du, S., Wang, Y. and Zhao, H. (2015) Timoshenko Beam Solution for the Response of Existing Tunnels Because of Tunneling Underneath. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 40, 766-784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef