儿童阑尾周围脓肿超声引导下经皮脓肿穿刺引流联合抗生素治疗与单用抗生素治疗的疗效对比分析
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Abscess Drainage Combined with Antibiotic Therapy Versus Antibiotic Therapy Alone in Pediatric Periappendiceal Abscess Management
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1561893, PDF,   
作者: 罗鹏程:重庆医科大学附属儿童医院普外创伤外科,国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心,儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室,儿童代谢与炎症性疾病重庆市重点实验室,重庆
关键词: 阑尾周围脓肿儿童超声引导下脓肿穿刺引流抗生素Periappendiceal Abscess Pediatric Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Abscess Drainage Antibiotic Therapy
摘要: 目的:研究分析超声引导下脓肿穿刺引流联合抗生素治疗与单用抗生素治疗在儿童阑尾周围脓肿的疗效及可行性。方法:收集重庆医科大学附属儿童医院2022年12月至2025年4月所有经超声或CT诊断为阑尾周围脓肿的患儿临床病历资料。将所有收集到的病例分为脓肿穿刺引流组和单用抗生素组,使用统计学方法分析各组的指标。结果:本研究共纳入了30例患儿,其中脓肿穿刺引流组15例(50.0%),两组间的入院时CRP (93.43 ± 55.92 vs 57 ± 30.05 mg/L)、入院时脓肿大小(8.1 vs 5.0 cm)、住院天数(12.0 ± 2.80 vs 15.67 ± 3.58天)、WBC恢复正常天数(7.27 ± 3.33 vs 15.67 ± 3.58天)、脓肿减小速率(0.42 vs 0.19 cm/天)的差异均有统计学意义。其中,脓肿穿刺引流组的入院时CRP、入院时脓肿大小、脓肿消除速率均显著高于单用抗生素组,而住院天数及WBC恢复正常天数均显著短于单用抗生素组。结论:超声引导下阑尾周围脓肿穿刺引流联用抗生素治疗组的病例的脓肿减小速率要明显高于单用抗生素组,明显缩短住院时间。超声引导下脓肿穿刺引流联合抗生素是儿童阑尾周围脓肿安全高效的治疗选择,但其临床应用需严格把握适应证,并依托多学科协作优化诊疗流程。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate and compare the efficacy and feasibility of ultrasound-guided percutaneous abscess drainage combined with antibiotic therapy versus antibiotic therapy alone in the management of pediatric periappendiceal abscess. Methods: Clinical data of pediatric patients diagnosed with periappendiceal abscess via ultrasound or CT between December 2022 and April 2025 were retrospectively collected. Cases were categorized into two groups: the percutaneous drainage group (combined with antibiotics) and the antibiotics-only group. Statistical analyses were performed to compare clinical outcomes between the groups. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled, including 15 (50.0%) in the drainage group. Statistically significant differences were observed in the following parameters: baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (93.43 ± 55.92 vs. 57 ± 30.05 mg/L), initial abscess size (8.1 vs. 5.0 cm), hospital stay duration (12.0 ± 2.80 vs. 15.67 ± 3.58 days), time to white blood cell (WBC) count normalization (7.27 ± 3.33 vs. 15.67 ± 3.58 days), and abscess reduction rate (0.42 vs. 0.19 cm/day). The drainage group exhibited significantly higher baseline CRP levels, larger initial abscess size, and faster abscess reduction rate compared to the antibiotics-only group, while demonstrating shorter hospital stays and quicker WBC normalization. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous abscess drainage combined with antibiotics achieves a significantly faster abscess resolution rate and reduces hospitalization duration compared to antibiotic therapy alone in pediatric periappendiceal abscess management. This combined approach represents a safe and effective therapeutic option, though its clinical application requires strict adherence to clinical indications and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize diagnostic and therapeutic protocols.
文章引用:罗鹏程. 儿童阑尾周围脓肿超声引导下经皮脓肿穿刺引流联合抗生素治疗与单用抗生素治疗的疗效对比分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(6): 1599-1603. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1561893

参考文献

[1] Nazarey, P.P., Stylianos, S., Velis, E., Triana, J., Diana-Zerpa, J., Pasaron, R., et al. (2014) Treatment of Suspected Acute Perforated Appendicitis with Antibiotics and Interval Appendectomy. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 49, 447-450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Deelder, J.D., Richir, M.C., Schoorl, T. and Schreurs, W.H. (2014) How to Treat an Appendiceal Inflammatory Mass: Operatively or Nonoperatively? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 18, 641-645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 齐雪琴, 孙万峰. 超声引导下穿刺置管引流联合抗生素治疗阑尾周围脓肿的临床疗效观察[J]. 吉林医学, 2013, 34(3): 503.
[4] 陈旭兰, 李颖, 屈波. 超声引导下经皮腹腔穿刺引流治疗小儿阑尾周围脓肿的临床研究[J]. 安徽医药, 2015, 19(7): 1282-1285.
[5] 王洪奇. 小儿阑尾周围脓肿非手术综合疗法[J]. 实用药物与临床, 2007(3): 167-168.
[6] Kuhelj, D. and Langel, C. (2024) Image-Guided Percutaneous Drainage of Abdominal Abscesses in Pediatric Patients. Children, 11, Article 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Mohammed, O.H., Humidan, A.A.M., Ahmed, A.S., Ahmed, S.S., Ibrahim, R.F., Omer, M.A.E., et al. (2024) Efficacy of Antibiotic Therapy Alone versus Antibiotics with Percutaneous Drainage in Periappendiceal Abscess: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 16, e73979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 胡新荣, 伍许月, 吴琼广, 等. Ⅰ期腹腔镜手术与保守方法治疗阑尾周围脓肿的效果分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2024, 15(14): 87-91.
[9] 蒋香梅, 唐伟. 肠杆菌科对第三代头孢菌素的耐药性分析[J]. 中国卫生产业, 2013, 10(33): 64+66.
[10] Karadag, C., Bayraktar, B., Sancar, M., Kara, O., Pelit, S., Celebi, S., et al. (2014) Ertapenem versus Standard Triple Antibiotic Therapy for the Treatment of Perforated Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Trial. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 24, 410-418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] van den Boom, A.L., de Wijkerslooth, E.M.L. and Wijnhoven, B.P.L. (2020) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Antibiotics for Patients with a Complex Appendicitis. Digestive Surgery, 37, 101-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Zhang, Y., Stringel, G., Bezahler, I. and Maddineni, S. (2020) Nonoperative Management of Periappendiceal Abscess in Children: A Comparison of Antibiotics Alone versus Antibiotics Plus Percutaneous Drainage. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 55, 414-417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 裴勖斌, 张琪, 杨礼, 等. 超声引导下经皮腹腔穿刺在小儿阑尾周围脓肿中的应用价值[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2021, 6(25): 103-105.