刑事专家辅助人制度的问题与完善
Problems and Improvement of the System of Criminal Expert Assistants
摘要: 为了弥补司法鉴定存在的弊端,我国引入了刑事专家辅助人制度,以帮助法官和当事人更好地理解诉讼过程中出现的专业性、技术性问题。这项制度虽然已经设立多年,但因法律规定不完善,导致其在适用过程中出现了诸多问题,严重制约了其功能的发挥。为解决刑事专家辅助人制度在实践中的乱象,需要从刑事专家辅助人的选任方式、管理制度出发,明确刑事专家辅助人的诉讼地位与诉讼立场,规范其参与诉讼的方式与程序,细化其权利、义务与责任,推动刑事专家辅助人制度不断完善,增强其在刑事诉讼中的实际效用,提高审判效率,促进司法公正,为我国法治建设提供理论支撑和实践参考。
Abstract: In order to remedy the shortcomings of judicial expertise, China has introduced the system of criminal expert assistants to help judges and parties better understand the professional and technical problems arising in the course of litigation. Although this system has been established for many years, there are many problems in its application due to the imperfect legal provisions, which seriously restrict its function. In order to solve the disorder of the system of criminal expert assistants in practice, it is necessary to start from the selection and management system of criminal expert assistants, clarify their litigation status and position, standardize their participation in litigation, refine their rights, obligations and responsibilities, promote the continuous improvement of the system of criminal expert assistants, enhance their actual effectiveness in criminal proceedings, improve trial efficiency, promote judicial justice, and provide theoretical support and practical reference for the construction of the rule of law in China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
郭贤钧. 浅析我国刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度现状及对策[J]. 法制博览, 2017(11): 86-88.
|
|
[2]
|
汪建成. 司法鉴定模式与专家证人模式的融合——中国刑事司法鉴定制度改革的方向[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2011, 19(4): 95-115.
|
|
[3]
|
王跃. 专家辅助人制度基本问题研究——以《刑事诉讼法》第192条规定为切入点[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2014, 16(1): 56-63.
|
|
[4]
|
陈瑞华. 论司法鉴定人的出庭作证[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2005(4): 11.
|
|
[5]
|
李宗楠. 刑事诉讼中专家辅助人的诉讼地位研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 延吉: 延边大学, 2021.
|
|
[6]
|
刘水华. 刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度的程序构建[J]. 人民检察, 2013(13): 76-77.
|
|
[7]
|
刘欢. 我国刑事诉讼中专家辅助人制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2019.
|
|
[8]
|
黄敏. 建立我国刑事司法鉴定“专家辅助人制度” [J]. 政治与法律, 2004(1): 136-140.
|
|
[9]
|
徐世君. 刑事专家辅助人制度的实践问题与完善路径研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2018.
|
|
[10]
|
邹明理. 专家辅助人出庭协助质证实务探讨[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2014(1): 6-11.
|