生成式人工智能辅助大学生英语写作效能研究
Efficacy of Generative AI in Assisting College Students with English Writing
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2025.1561083, PDF,   
作者: 刘秀梅, 董 静, 田静莹：中国矿业大学(北京)文法学院，北京
关键词: 生成式人工智能；英语写作；效能研究；Generative AI； English Writing； Efficacy Study
摘要: 本研究旨在探讨生成式人工智能辅助大学生英语写作的整体效能及具体表现。研究采用实验法，共15名大学生志愿者参加为期8周的雅思写作任务2实验。实验中学生完成作文一稿后，ChatGPT4.0为学生提供评改意见，在此基础上，学生完成二稿。通过对比实验前测和后测结果，本研究发现大多数学习者通过AI辅助训练，写作整体得分都有提升；在雅思写作任务2的四个评分维度中，学生在衔接、词汇以及语法三个方面提升最为明显。研究肯定了生成式人工智能辅助大学生英语写作的有效性，提出进一步探索教师与AI协作开展大学生英语写作评改模式的可能性。
Abstract: The current study aims to investigate the overall efficacy and specific impacts of generative AI in assisting college students with English writing. An experimental method was employed, involving 15 volunteer university students who participated in an 8-week IELTS Writing Task 2 experiment. After completing their first drafts, students received feedback and revision suggestions from ChatGPT-4.0, based on which they produced their second drafts. By comparing pre-test and post-test results, the study found that most learners demonstrated improved overall writing scores through AI-assisted training. Among the four IELTS Writing Task 2 assessment criteria, students showed the most significant progress in cohesion and coherence, lexical resource, and grammatical range & accuracy. The findings affirm the effectiveness of generative AI in supporting English writing development and suggest further exploration into collaborative teacher-AI feedback models for university-level writing instruction.
文章引用：刘秀梅, 董静, 田静莹. 生成式人工智能辅助大学生英语写作效能研究[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(6): 934-941. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.1561083

参考文献

[1] 张绒. 生成式人工智能技术对教育领域的影响——关于ChatGPT的专访[J]. 电化教育研究, 2023, 44(2): 5-14.
[2] 陈茉, 吕明臣. ChatGPT环境下的大学英语写作教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2024, 24(1): 161-168.
[3] 胡壮麟. ChatGPT谈外语教学[J].中国外语, 2023, 20(3): 1+12-15.
[4] 郭茜, 冯瑞玲, 华远方. ChatGPT在英语学术论文写作与教学中的应用及潜在问题[J].外语电化教学, 2023(2): 18-23+107.
[5] 徐林林, 胡杰辉, 苏扬. 人工智能辅助学术英语写作的学习者认知及行为研究[J]. 外语界, 2024(3): 51-58.
[6] 魏爽, 李璐遥. 人工智能辅助二语写作反馈研究——以ChatGPT为例[J]. 中国外语, 2023, 20(3): 33-40.
[7] Fyfe, P. (2022) How to Cheat on Your Final Paper: Assigning AI for Student Writing. AI & Society, 38, 1395-1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Kumar, R. (2023) Faculty Members’ Use of Artificial Intelligence to Grade Student Papers: A Case of Implications. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article No. 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Wu, Y. (2023) Integrating Generative AI in Education: How ChatGPT Brings Challenges for Future Learning and Teaching. Journal of Advanced Research in Education, 2, 6-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Barrett, A. and Pack, A. (2023) Not Quite Eye to A.I.: Student and Teacher Perspectives on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Writing Process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article No. 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Dang, A. and Wang, H. (2024) Ethical Use of Generative AI for Writing Practices: Addressing Linguistically Diverse Students in U.S. Universities’ AI Statements. Journal of Second Language Writing, 66, article 101157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I. and Jerković, I. (2023) Better by You, Better Than Me? ChatGPT-3 as Writing Assistance in Students’ Essays.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04536
[13] Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, H., Li, T., Tsai, Y., Gašević, D., et al. (2023). Can Large Language Models Provide Feedback to Students? A Case Study on ChatGPT. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Orem, 10-13 July 2023, 323-325.[CrossRef] 
[14] Jiang, J., Vetter, M.A. and Lucia, B. (2024) Toward a “More-Than-Digital” AI Literacy: Reimagining Agency and Authorship in the Postdigital Era with ChatGPT. Postdigital Science and Education, 6, 922-939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐